It's Pats-Colts week, with Sunday night's contest in Indianapolis the 10th game between Indy and New England since 2003, the second year of the new alignment that left them in different divisions.With the ascendancy of Twitter, it appears to be Pats-Colts conspiracy week.
Since I don't have 3,123,174 followers, like my friends Peter King, Adam Schefter and Chris Mortensen (@SI_PeterKing, @Adam_Schefter, @mortreport, respectively), I'm reduced to following their answers to fan questions as unofficial Twitter answer men on the NFL. Their responses (especially the ones from Peter) are, at times, to questions implying some sort of conspiracy by the NFL and the networks to make sure the Patriots and Colts play every season.
Peter put that one to rest by noting that there's no conspiracy although he couldn't explain the whole thing in 140 characters.
So let me (@deegle84) try in a more lengthy format.
The NFL's scheduling formula has resulted in Pats-Colts games every year because if the AFC East and AFC South aren't meeting (a once-every-three years thing), the teams that finish in corresponding positions the previous season play each other. Indy and New England, of course, finish first almost every year -- except 2008, when both finished second -- to Tennessee and Miami, respectively. My how things change.
But just to set the record straight, there is one "conspiracy'' involved between the NFL and the networks, who always schedule the Colts-Patriots game for November, "sweeps'' month. Ratings, folks! The networks base their advertising charges on the November rating, which means the best games (or the best quarterbacks) bring the most money.
Are these the best teams?
The midseason records say sort of. Reality says that with Pittsburgh, they're the best in the AFC, which I guess means that line about change is premature.
Top 6 (based on current level of play)
1. New Orleans (8-0): It never hurts to get a scare, as the Saints did from Carolina last week. It doesn't hurt to get a loss either, which probably will happen down the line.
2. Indianapolis (8-0): The Colts got a scare last week, too, from Houston. But if Texans kicker Kris Brown had made his field goal to tie it, the Colts would have won anyway in overtime. Because they always beat the Texans.
3. Minnesota (7-1): I don't like midseason awards but I might make Brett the MVP over Peyton and Drew. Without him, the Vikings might be 5-3 or 4-4.
4. Pittsburgh (6-2): One player can make a difference if he's named Polamalu.
5. New England (6-2): Belichick won't be coach of the year, but the way the Patriots are playing with a very new defense and a lot of injuries on offense suggests that he might deserve consideration.
6. Dallas (6-2): I really hate to do this but Romo's playing well, Wade is coaching well (or reasonably so) and opponents really have to worry about Miles Austin, who's a lot better than both T.O. and Roy Williams.
Bottom 6
Too many teams to fill too few spots at the bottom, but ...
27. Kansas City (1-7): Give Scott Pioli time. Getting rid of Larry Johnson was the right decision -- not only for his disruptive behavior, but because he's hit the 30-year-old running back wall.
28. Washington (2-6): Interesting that DeAngelo Hall put himself into the middle of a fight with Mike Smith. Hall's another waste of big money by Dan Snyder. Maybe it's a tax deduction.
29. Oakland (2-6): Now Al Davis reportedly wants to dump Tom Cable "for cause.'' I still think the NFL should work like European soccer leagues and relegate -- the Raiders would be in the fourth division "for cause'' by now.
30. Tampa Bay (1-7): OK, the Bucs have their win for the season. And maybe their QB -- Josh Freeman was pretty decent against the Packers.
31. St. Louis (1-7): The Rams' future depends on who buys them. A good owner and in a few years ...
32. Cleveland (1-7)" The Browns won't be sold, and Randy Lerner doesn't seem to listen to the wise heads he consults. Maybe the next "consultant'' should be Martin O'Neill, who's done a pretty good job managing Lerner's Aston Villa soccer team.


















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
11-11-2009 @ 7:22PM
anthonysofly420 said...
in the afc yeah nfc saints but they have a weak schedule
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 12:30PM
Mr. Funchess said...
not true the giants had a weak schedule... the saints proved themselves in the face of adversity, the colts too
11-12-2009 @ 3:46PM
bdyftns said...
The Pats and Colts may or maynot be the best two teams in the NFL, but you couldn't ask for a better match-up, Peyton vs Brady.
Of course there's a lot more to the game than just the QB's, but two are the best and it's going to be a great game to watch.
11-11-2009 @ 9:27PM
Bill said...
yes are you out of your mind favre ahead of no 18 no way no day
Reply
11-11-2009 @ 9:50PM
roger said...
the cowboys are for real don't be a hater
Reply
11-13-2009 @ 1:03PM
Daddy said...
Ha Ha Ha Ha you gotta be kidding me Romo could throw a dirty towel in a hamper two feet away. Not true but he is an awfull leader on the feild.
11-11-2009 @ 9:52PM
garycarter1956 said...
The colts also have a weak schedule maybe weaker than the Saints. But remember that when this schedule was made that all the teams the Saints played except for Detroit had finished with a better record than the Saints. If the Saints had not gotten Gregg Williams and darren Sharper, I am sure it would have been same old same old. But thats not the case and they arfe Improved so much that they are the best in the league at this point
Reply
11-11-2009 @ 10:48PM
I see you Padin said...
Why Pittsburgh so high? They barely beat Denver, who got killed by Baltimore. Pittsburgh has zero quality wins and one of the worst QBs ever to play the game.
Reply
11-11-2009 @ 11:26PM
bsteel said...
ben is a winner,oh i see u didnt watch that denver game,cause it was a blow out to everyone else.and please dont say the ravens they are still crying about any lost.when it all say and done pittsburgh is going to repeat.and who is your team the cowgirl,because dallas aint nothing wit T.O and without T.O,
11-12-2009 @ 9:36AM
Steve said...
Padin,
Did Ben forget to call you after sex too? Is that why you seem to have an uncontrollable hate "obsession" for him?...or is your name Andrea McNutty?
11-13-2009 @ 10:56PM
brownpride57 said...
reply to isee you padin;why are you whinning about the champs being so high as far as im concerned the champs should be no. 1 in the rankings they are the defending champions until some one comes along and knocks them off which is a long time away,also you dont claim your team in your comments who is your team? the cowturds always start off great only to peeter out at the end of the season just like always they will keystone cops at the end ,bunch of sissies
11-11-2009 @ 11:37PM
ken72864 said...
Why do you state "the best teams at the current level of play"? What you really mean is that you can't stand it that the Saints are the best team in football period. The Cowboys win a couple of games and the headlines are about Romo! If they were undefeated at this point they would occupy all the sports columns.
As for the Saints easy schedule. Giants 2008 NFC East champions, Miami 2008 AFC East champions, Atlanta 2008 NFC South champions!!! Who is left to beat????
Reply
11-11-2009 @ 11:44PM
anthonysofly420 said...
uh the patriots lets see the saints beat them they barley beat carolina
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 12:42AM
Tennis4Tara said...
Just wait for the Chargers to really get going. I see only one or two losses remaining on the schedule.
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 2:43AM
Big Rog said...
cowboys are playing well but i still dont know if theyre for real....well see if romo chokes or finally prevails
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 3:13AM
Chris B. said...
Common sense, the Saints have the easiest schedule in the NFL. The Steelers had a slow start but showing dominance once again. The Patriots really hasnt played anyone real yet. The Colt is winning without a full roster, does that tell you something? The Giants cant find the endzone for nothing. The AFC is waaaay powerful than the NFC, Hands Down.
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 6:09AM
wwkenwayne said...
Who would you want at your back in Iran!
Tom Terrific! Manning! or Big Ben, nuff said!
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 8:30AM
bobbren1 said...
The Saints are amazing and I am not a Saints fan. They have not exactly had close games and when they are down come back quickly.
The Colts have one of the easiest schedules and the teams they play that are any good are at home in their dome....funny how that works.
I am not saying they are not good but Manning is no MVP...The Media makes the COLTS sound useless.
Neither the Saints or Colts have the tuff schedule the Pats of 07 had.
Minnesota...Once a huge Brett fan but can't stand to look at his cry baby face any more. Is someone going to have to pay a fine for his injured groin he is talking about now? Not saying the team isn't doing well. AP is the best.
Big Ben does not deserve the hype but the Steeler Team is pretty darn good one can't argue that.
Not sure where they will go but they can't be ignored. Brady is a three time SB champion even if the media never admits it. All I hear is how him and Manning have a combined four SB....must be trying to make Manning sound better like they always do.
Dallas....we will see.
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 8:39AM
bobbren1 said...
Chris B....The Colts don't have less injured players then the Pat's or any other team have it is just the Media likes to make excuses for Manning.
How can you say Saints or Pats have only played easy teams? Look at what you are saying...the Colts biggest game was against the Texans.
Reply
11-12-2009 @ 8:48AM
df1tomkat said...
What a bunch of CROCK!!! Pittsburgh doesn't even lead their own division!
Reply