LONDON – If you hated the thought of Toyota entering NASCAR or some Belgian company buying Anheuser-Busch, you won't like what Roger Goodell said Friday.London is calling, and the NFL is listening.
It's thinking of putting a franchise here. Forget what you may have heard about warm beer and pickles on pizza, London would be a great spot for an NFL team.
A few candidates come immediately to mind. Buffalo, St. Louis, even Oakland unless Al Davis demands his old job back as the warden at the Tower of London.
But one franchise is at the top of the relocation list -- Jacksonville.
According to latest NFL attendance figures, the Jaguars couldn't do much worse if they moved to Phnom Penh. Meanwhile, Wembley Stadium will be rollicking with 90,000 fans for Sunday's game between the Patriots and Bucs.
The Brits have gone ga-ga over real football at the old soccer pitch. That's all of three games in three seasons now.
"If we brought more than one game here," Goodell said, "and it continues to have the same kind of enthusiasm and growth of interest, I think that's about as good an indicator you can get that it could successfully support a franchise."
I can't guarantee the NFL will thrive in London but I do know King Henry's wives had a better chance of survival than the league does in Jacksonville.
The Jaguars lost 17,000 season-ticket holders in the off-season. They're averaging 43,874 fans this year in a stadium that can hold 77,000.
"We know we can't be a viable NFL city if we sell only 46,000 seats in a 66,000-seat stadium (game-day capacity)," Jaguars owner Wayne Weaver told the Orlando Sentinel in September.
He was floating the idea of playing games in Orlando. A few days later he started openly campaigning for the Jaguars to draft hometown icon Tim Tebow.
Never mind that Tebow could be ranked the 13th-best quarterback on Coach Jack Del Rio's draft board. Weaver is so desperate to revive this mummy he'd start hometown boys Lynyrd Skynyrd on the offensive line.
As a hometown Jacksonville boy, I wish it hadn't come to this, but it's time to face reality. Pro football is a lost cause and the Jaguars should call Mayflower.
Forget moving to L.A., which misses the NFL about as badly as Kate misses Jon. Every American sports league knows the future is global, and London is the best place to plant the first flag.
Sure, the NFL currently ranks somewhere between croquet and flossing in popularity among English sports fans. And NFL Europe died of apathy two years ago. It was an NFL retrenchment, not a withdrawal.
"The reason NFL Europe failed is because British fans were knowledgeable enough to realize it was second-rate football," said Paul Stewart, who runs a Bucs' fan site.
That's why soccer fans are far more likely to pay to see Manchester United than the San Jose Earthquakes. But unlike the MLS, British fans wouldn't be asked to support an entire league. They'd have Manchester United every week, or whatever the Jacksonville equivalent of Man U would be.
If you can't quite picture that, imagine if a city had London's track record and potential. Three overflow crowds have shown up for three trial games. There are 13 million people to draw from, scores of Euro Fortune 500 companies to sell skyboxes to and a two-year-old stadium at the ready.
And not to denigrate the North Florida Agricultural Fair, but London gives the NFL a tad more cosmopolitan cachet.
"It would be nice if we could hang around a little longer and go see the Tower of London and all that," Bill Belichick said.
When was the last time anyone said they wanted to hang out a little longer in Jacksonville ?
But I am not here to bash my hometown. I am here to dispel any xenophobic notions you may have for London.
It's too far.
London is a six-hour flight from the East coast, which is not much worse than going to Seattle.
The weather is blah.
You prefer Cleveland ?
Players wouldn't want to live there.
If they can adjust to Green Bay, they can manage in London.
The people have funny accents.
You ever been to Jacksonville?
The average Brit doesn't even know who Tim Tebow is.
Exactly.
If the Jaguars moved here, they wouldn't need a savior. It would be good to lose the teal and get Union Jack colors. Then change the nickname to something more fitting, like London Fog or Bridges or Blitzes or Cavities.
The Jaguars already have Maurice Jones-Drew, whose very British name should roll right off BBC tongues. And imagine how many "Jack the Ripper" headlines Fleet Street would crank out after Del Rio 's first meltdown.
Granted, at first the idea of an NFL team in London is, as they say around here, a bit queer. But with all due respect to Tebow, the city would be the No. 1 pick in a global draft.
The NFL sees all that potential. If Weaver can't, he should ask himself a simple question.
What would the Jaguars have to lose?
Certainly not a lot of fans.



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-23-2009 @ 4:09PM
WWLeake said...
What a waste of money. The NFL should at least cover the major cities in North America before it moves to Europe. Also I remember the last London game in which players running were one to two square foot divots in the field. It was an awful game that was poorly attended. So the bright people in Comish's office are going to move there. Must be a bunch of bored Harvard grads working for the Comish. Bad move and the old fans are not going to be happy about this.
Reply
10-23-2009 @ 5:22PM
Peter said...
Then it wouldn't be the NATIONAL football league anymore...
Reply
10-23-2009 @ 6:07PM
soulcitysigma1914 said...
i'm not quite as quick to dismiss this issue as you are: "London is a six-hour flight from the East coast, which is not much worse than going to Seattle."
And I think there's a big difference between going from East Coast time to a later time in London as opposed to an earlier one in Seattle. And imagine if/when non-EST teams like those in New Orleans, Texas, Chicago, Minnesota, etc. have to go to London to play. Wow! I feel sorry for those guys and the time lag they'll feel.
And the guys who are based on London too. They never play a team that's relatively close. Yeah Carolina may have to go visit the Seahawks or the Raiders every now and then, but they get a lot of East Coast games. The London team is going to play 8 games against teams that are REALLY far away every year. Sure, perhaps they are at a serious advantage maybe in those other 8 games when they host, but to be honest, I think that that unprecedented travel wear and tear will exhaust them to the point where even in their home game weeks, travel fatigue will linger.
I don't think the NFL is being player oriented at the moment. I was floored when Goodell said he'd consider playing 18-game seasons. That is tooo much stress on the player's body. Imagine if Larry Johnson of a few years ago had to play 18 games instead of 16; he'd probably be all out of steam and retired by now.
If people don't want to pay full price for 4 preseason games where the stars don't play, here's an idea: make those preseason games half price! I seriously doubt it would cause the NFL to go bankrupt.
Reply
10-23-2009 @ 9:59PM
briock said...
This is a stupid article. They are not going to put a franchise in London. Besides, there are plenty of other cities in the states... Los Angeles, Oklahoma City, Omaha, Honolulu, Hattiesburg, etc.
Reply
10-24-2009 @ 12:04AM
Glenn20 said...
Why not go to Canada instead? There are some big cities there that would support an NFL team -- and it wouldn't really add any travel difficulties since the time zones are the same as ours. Plus, Canadians already understand American football a lot better than Europeans. Yes, I know there is a Canadian league, but so what? The NFL would blow them away. All I can figure is the NFL must have some type of secret non-compete agreement with the CFL.
Reply
10-24-2009 @ 1:33AM
Lakergregg said...
This guy's article was as ridiculous as the last one from Terence Moore but at least he didn't see the "calm eyes" of London.
Wow, Mariotti is really starting to get some stiff competition for crappiest sports writer.
Who Knew!?
Reply
10-24-2009 @ 9:46AM
yasmeengowani said...
i hate this guy. I am a huge Jaguars fan and yeah, i do want to hang out a little longer in jacksonville.
Reply
10-24-2009 @ 4:08PM
fxdwidegld said...
First David, if you were from Jacksonville, glad you're gone. Do us a favor and stay gone. Second, the Jags have plenty of fans here. You want to know why tickets sells are bad ... look at the economy here in the Jacksonville area and Florida. People can't afford the price of a ticket when paying the rent and putting food on the table will not happen if they do. Fact is It's a small market in a bad economy. That is why the Jags aren't filling the stadium, not because they don't have fans here!
Reply
10-24-2009 @ 4:16PM
reikilight said...
It is funny how these internet sports writers try to make a story. It would be a waste of money to send a real football team to London in my opinion ... why cater to a foreign market and spend extra money and travel time so Goodell can spread the NFL dynasty to another continent when there are still lots of big populated areas in this country that are a state or two away from an NFL team. It would make more sense to expand to Canada or Mexico or South America before catering to the snobby English! Isn't it interesting that a team can be mismanaged and the press immediately want to off their team. Lame article ... rivaling Nancy Gay's BS spin. The Fanhouse group is getting as bad as the National Enquirer!
Reply
10-25-2009 @ 1:45AM
hrczar55 said...
Stop this BS now! I refuse to watch a football game played outside the USA, unless it involves teams from other countries. Global grabbing has destroyed hockey, is about to tank the NBA, has lost baseball beyond belief...... the NFL down the tubes. Stop this nonsense.
Reply
10-26-2009 @ 11:26PM
donamic1 said...
KEEP the NFL in USA. Semper Phi
Reply