When Justin Tuck showed up to watch film of the Arizona Cardinals this week, he was fired up. He knew what he was going to see -- Cardinals QB Kurt Warner sitting behind his line, taking forever to get rid of the ball while a swarm of receivers ran their routes downfield."I was licking my chops," said Tuck, the Giants' defensive end. "But then I went in there and...he's not holding the ball as long as he used to. We're looking at an average of 2.2 seconds, which is a drastic change."
You wouldn't think the Cardinals would have to change much, playing in the weak NFC West and coming off a season in which they represented the NFC in the Super Bowl. But starting with an opening-week loss to the surprisingly game division-rival 49ers, the Cardinals found life as defending conference champs to be tougher than they thought it would be.
"The hardest thing that we have had to deal with is expectations," Arizona coach Ken Whisenhunt said Wednesday. "Not necessarily from outside sources, but from our own guys trying to live up to the reputation of an NFC champion. I think that caused us to press a little bit too much early in the season, play a little too uptight."
That was Whisenhunt's message to his team during their Week 4 bye, when they were 1-2 and coming off a Sunday night thrashing by the Colts on national TV. The Cardinals came out of the bye and beat the Texans in a shootout, then went to Seattle last week and posted their most impressive victory of the season so far. Now, as they ready to face the 5-1 Giants on Sunday night in the Meadowlands, the 3-2 Cardinals look a lot more like the team that left the rest of the NFC in the dust last January.
"After our bye week, we've just been trying to get back to playing the way we played last year in the playoffs," Whisenhunt said. "That is with a little more looseness, a little more excitement."
Excitement is, of course, the Cardinals' specialty. They run as pass-heavy an offense as there is in the league, relying on the arm of the veteran Warner and the downfield skills of receivers Larry Fitzgerald, Anquan Boldin and Steve Breaston. They rank sixth in the league in passing yards per game and dead last in rush yards per game, and they make no apologies for the discrepancy.
"You have to play to your strengths," Warner said. "If we go into a game and we're having trouble running the ball, we feel good about throwing. It puts more pressure on that part of the game, but we feel we're pretty good at it."
The Giants are coming off a game in which the Saints threw all over their banged-up secondary and kept pressure off quarterback Drew Brees with a variety of play-action calls. But when asked if playing New Orleans can get you ready to play Arizona, they all said the Cardinals' offense is unique. And the main reason it seems to be unique, as simple as this sounds, is the quality of the athletes it uses.
"When they get in their rhythm, honestly I think it's just the receivers that they've got," Giants defensive end Mathias Kiwanuka said. "A lot of times, when they throw the ball up there, they're covered. And they just make the great plays on the ball. So when you've got guys you can trust like that with a good quarterback, that makes it tough on a defense."
The Cardinals come into this weekend banged up. Boldin is struggling with an ankle injury and didn't practice Wednesday. Breaston has been fighting a knee injury all season. But don't make the mistake of thinking they're going to show up on your TV on Sunday night and start running the ball into the line with Tim Hightower and Beanie Wells. The Cardinals are what they are -- they throw the ball. And then they throw it some more."It's a different style, no doubt," Giants coach Tom Coughlin said. "All four receivers are involved. The tight end is involved. The backs -- Tim Hightower is their third-leading receiver. They have excellent distribution. The ball is spread around real good."
Oh, and there's that little detail about how much quicker Warner is getting rid of the ball than he did last year. An idea at which Warner laughed.
"It goes year to year," Warner said. "If I'm successful, people say I'm getting the ball out quick. If I'm not successful, people say I'm holding the ball too long. I don't feel that I'm doing anything better. Maybe our scheme, maybe the way our receivers are playing helps me get the ball out quicker. I don't have any evidence to say one way or the other."
What Warner and the Cardinals have is a 3-2 record and a level of confidence that is moving in the right direction -- from where it was after the Colts beat them up in Week 3 and headed back toward where it was when they had a lead on the Steelers in the final minutes of the Super Bowl. Will it get all the way back there? No way to know. But one thing's for certain. If they do get back there, the Cardinals are going to do it by throwing the ball.


















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-22-2009 @ 12:47PM
Nate Young said...
Before i start, i'll let you know i am moderately biased towards the cardinals (i am a resident of arizona). The nfc west has been labeled one of the worse divisions in football yet in four years two teams seattle and arizona have represented the NFC in the superbowl.
There is no such thing as an "easy" divison game in the entire NFL and i do not understand why sports casters and writings seem to not grasp this concept. It's most likely due to there lack of playing competitive sports even through high school or college when you face your rival school or someone in your conferance ( standford beating USC when they were 30+ pt underdogs comes to mind) the game is alot tougher.
Annoiting the Giants as one of the best NFL teams is understandable since they are two years off a super bowl victory is understandable but at the same time they SHOULD OF loss to the Dallas Cowboys in the Cowboys home season opener. They barely scrapped a win and the big part if it is that Tony Romo has yet to win one, thats right one, big game in his entire career. (you should attribute that loss to tony romo and not the entire cowboys roster)
There other opponents are the fodder of the league and when they faced an excellent team they got blown out. Arizona is by far the least respected team in the NFL. No one gives them credit for anything they do it is always about the ineptness of the other team.
The NFC East is often hailed as the best division in football yet the redskins are abyssmal, philidelphia lost to oakland, and the Cowboys had to have a career day from austin miles and take the game in overtime to beat the chiefs. ( it seems the chiefs play there best football against the NFC east?).
The giants have played, the bucs, chiefs, raiders, cowboys, redskins, and the saints. They beat the 1 win chiefs by 11 points, and the absolutely ABYSSMAL redskins by 6 points. Sure they blew out oakland and tampa bay, but tampa is 30 million under the salary cap and seems more like a college team... and well oakland is just oakland behind j-russ they don't have much of a passing game.
All in all the giants are the most overrated team in the league and there showing against new orleans proved this.
Reply
10-22-2009 @ 6:06PM
john galt said...
just being an nfc west divisional champ is the definition of overrated. seatle was guaranteed 6 wins a season until recently. only the steelers until this year had an easier divisonal road.
second of all, the saints played the lions, eagles, jets and the bills. lions/ bills nuff said. the saints managed just 10 offensive points against an overrated jets d and needed to pick on a rookie qb for points. the eagles, while talented lost to raiders. some brutal stretch for the mighty saints. they played a great game against a banged up team and theyre def. for real. but i think the whole world knows that that game's ridiculous score was a fluke.
lastly, when was the last time more one team out of the NFC west made it to the playoffs? i mean ever? exactly. between the eagles and giants alone you have 5 times in the last 10 years. so yeah, the NFC west is an afterthought for legitmate reasons. The cardinals have a great offense and not much else. be happy with the magic carpet ride and enjoy warner to boldin/fitzgerald until the leinart era begins.
Reply
10-22-2009 @ 6:12PM
john galt said...
oh and as for the cowboy game, did you watch it? I dont know why the giants "shouldve lost that game", when they drove down the field to kick a game winning field goal under two minutes. dope.
Reply
10-22-2009 @ 6:20PM
Timothy said...
Yes, Seattle and Arizona did represent in the superbowl in the past four years. A fact they should both be proud of! (An as a Steelers fan I say, thanks for two more super bowl rings! )
Reply
10-25-2009 @ 1:05PM
Geezer said...
Why thank them? You should be thanking the refs for completely rigging both games for you, especially the Seattle one that is still controversial today.
Face it, without the refs being on your side, you would have lost at least 24-3 to Seattle. But the refs were in the tank for Pittsburgh and not only took away a rightful Seattle touchdown on a bogus offensive pass-interference call, but also gave Roethlisberger a free touchdown despite never breaking the goal-line plane. Not to mention the blown "delay of game" no-call at the end of the fourth quarter and the phantom holding call.
Then, you only won last year because the refs had to scramble to protect your team, the "Chosen Ones", who were busy choking it up to less-marketable Arizona. Santonio's game-winning catch was amazing, but do you honestly think they would ever call that in bounds on any other team? It was so close that the refs would probably take the safe route and call it out-of-bounds for anybody else.