In the end, it's pretty obvious who mentored Aaron Rodgers on his way to becoming an NFL starting quarterback. Green Bay Packer fans might want to curse the name of Brett Favre these days, but between Rodgers' effort in the loss to Minnesota Oct. 5, and his recent comments about the Packers' offensive line and his own play, it has become abundantly clear that Favre had quite the impact on Rodgers.During that loss to Minnesota, Rodgers couldn't have played more stubbornly. He held the ball too long, took sacks he didn't need to take, forced a throw into a coverage he shouldn't have been throwing into, got hit way too many times, and managed to keep getting up. No matter what they threw at him, he refused to quit or give anything to the Vikings.
Throw in some gray stubble, shorter hair, and a bit stockier body, and you have the epitome of Favre's career in Green Bay.
Frankly, this has to be considered a good thing. Rodgers has played the game with much more control than Favre ever did as a Packer, and that's the one facet of Favre's game that anyone could possibly claim the right to complain about. However, while eschewing Favre's wild style for a more controlled game, Rodgers also appears to have picked up some of Favre's better traits.
Since that game, Green Bay has been largely silent, since the team had a bye week. As they get ready to host Detroit Sunday at Lambeau Field, Rodgers has made two things very clear. For starters, he's not changing the way he plays the game.
"I watched last year's film at Minnesota, and I felt like I had gotten out too early. I passed over a guy in my progression. So I was telling myself all week, be patient, play fast but play under control. They got to me a few times, that's what happened."Also, you're not going to goad him into throwing his offensive linemen to the wolves.
"It really doesn't do any good," Rodgers said Wednesday. "I trust those guys. I love those guys. They take care of me, I take care of them. That's the way it goes. We have a tight-knit relationship. Nothing gets done when you do something like that publicly."In the end, the Packers will benefit from this. Rodgers has shown time and time again that he will continue to be a good teammate, and he won't publicly criticize people, even if their failures mean he ends up flat on his back. He's accountable and willing to improve.
Rodgers reiterated Wednesday that he has confidence in his linemen, adding that everyone on the team wants and needs to play better for the Packers (2-2) to hit the high expectations they carried into the season.
"We're all pros," Rodgers said. "We all hold ourselves to a standard of play, and I'd say myself and those guys included would probably all agree that personally, we haven't played up to our potential at all times. We all want to play better. We're going to play better."
And he seems to have developed some of that good ol' southern stubbornness. He may never admit it, but at least some of that has to have come from the legend he followed.



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-15-2009 @ 3:20PM
vogllaw said...
Farve a role model on not criticizing teammates? Hmmm didn't Javon Walker leave the Packers primarily because he was mad at Farve for calling him out on contract negotiations. Also, didn't Farve publicly blame Sterling Sharpe for holding out on a contract?
Reply
10-15-2009 @ 4:19PM
John said...
Bruce - We are so glad you came back! We thought that because the guy you loved to bash so much was doing so good and the QB you love so much has been such a failure this year, that you were afraid to face us and admit it. But at least half of that is true. You won't admit it. I mean, after all, Rodgers has really followed his mentor's footsteps this year. Green Bay is 5-0, right? Just like Brett's team. And they did so well last year too!
Do us all a favor, and don't mention Aaron Rodgers name in the same sentence as Brett Favre. Aaron rodgers has erned that yet.
Another thing, if you want to write an article, write one and tell us how wrong you were in bashing Favre the past six months!
Reply
10-15-2009 @ 9:37PM
rowdymud said...
Your comments are spot on. The whole sports media has been critical of Brett. They spend all week every week running him down. The should spend it eating crow. I have nothing against this Rogers guy, but so far he hasn't lived up to the hype and accolades bestowed on him. I personally predict he will be simply another forgotten quaterback in 5 yrs. He simply doesn't display the passion that seems the common denomantor for greatness. Brett has passion. He loves the game. Hell 5 year old children can see it. I'm a Stabauch fan; one of the greats hands down. I just wish Brett had gone to Dallas. If he had, Dallas would be 5-0 Why the media can't jump on his wagon behooves me. He is the very epitomy of why I love the game.
10-15-2009 @ 4:28PM
Bruce Ciskie said...
The problem, John, is that I have hardly been "bashing Favre" for the past six months.
Have I defended the Packers? Yes, and the Vikings could go 19-0 and win it all, and I'd still defend the Packers.
But I've hardly been "bashing Brett Favre." That implies that things I've said have not been true.
Then again, if Favre told you the sky was hot pink, you'd probably believe him.
Reply
10-15-2009 @ 4:40PM
John said...
See - you just can't bring yourself to admit it. You've continually said that Aaron Rodgers is a better quarterback than Brett Farve. Yeah, he has REALLY proved that! 8-12 as a starter! Go Aaron!
10-15-2009 @ 8:59PM
radmandragon said...
LOL re. "hot pink." Don't know that I'd give Favre too much credit for his influence, but he was a pretty solid role model in the area of toughness. FWIW, I'll take Rodgers over Favre at this stage. It's a long season...we'll see how well Favre holds up. I love watching the guy play, but I remain a Packer fan and Rodgers has the potential to be an amazing QB (he doesn't exactly suck now).
10-15-2009 @ 10:19PM
rowdymud said...
You sir, are an incredible idot. When you can't defend your position, you hurl slurrs at the person holding you accountable for your predictions & unteneable position. You are obviously in a the wrong profession when you can't understand greatnees. Politics &/or selling used cars come to mind as a more suitable profession. What personal insults will you throw my way I wonder. You sir & Mr Rogers, I predict, will be looking for another line of work in the not so distant furtue. Guys, Rogers is probably a good man and a good athelete, but to play quaterback in the NFL, you have to be a tough son-of-gun. No one knows his mettle at this time. There are 20 flops per solid player at his position. To have the aducity to compare Rogers to Farve is incredible premature stupidity.
Reply
10-16-2009 @ 8:16AM
Brody said...
rowdymud says: "You sir, are an incredible idot."
That pretty much says it all. And we're supposed to take you seriously rowdy? Tool.
Whenever Favre is on a team and anything good happens, you attribute it all to Favre. You're the same Favre-worshipping idiots that claimed the Jets hot start was due entirely to Favre. Looks like they've started off well this year too. You're acting like Favre has proven something by having a great year with the Vikings - look at what's around him. You don't think Rodgers would be 5-0 with that team, too? Hell, Gus Frerotte was able to take that team to the playoffs last year.
10-16-2009 @ 8:05AM
rjones said...
The reason Rodgers hangs on to the ball too long is because he doesn't want to throw into tight coverage and maybe having the pass intercepted.
He is so afraid of throwing a pick, not because it will hurt the team, but because he might be compaired to Favre.
That is why, with that mentality, he will never become a premier quarterback or Hall of Famer.
The best quarterbacks of all time were not afraid to take risks to make the big plays. Playing it safe only guarantees you a career of mediocrity.
Reply
10-16-2009 @ 9:58AM
John said...
You are absolutely right. If you go way back to when Rodgers was drafted, you have to ask why he slid down the draft so far if he was such a good QB. After all, QB's and RB's are premium during the draft. What did the other team scouts see that Ted Thompson didn't? I've never followed Rodgers' college years, but has he always been indecisive? Is he only good when he has the time and protection to be good? And did TT draft him simply because he was available. If so, what did he give up in that decision? Who could he have gotten instead?
10-16-2009 @ 5:11PM
Michael Gilland said...
I don't know what games you're watching but it sure is'nt Packer games. When A-RON has protection he makes plays. NUFF SAID! PS. I still think Bret is a good player but when he is on the other side of the line he is the enemy. That's just the way it is.
Reply
10-21-2009 @ 2:41PM
DAN said...
the GB dose not win games , there 22 author factors in to play there , i realy like brett and i am a big fan but if i had to take a GB right now i would go with Rogers , and that was stupid to say Rogers went 6 and 10 the geen bay packers went 6 an 10 , in almost every loss Roger got us the lead in the 4th and our D could not hold one of them for us .so get you head off of bretts nob you clown
Reply
10-21-2009 @ 2:43PM
DAN said...
you have to ask yourself wy tom brady slid so far in the draft ????? that dosen't meen sh@t
Reply