Every week, NFL FanHouse hits the lowlights from Sunday's action, looking at those players who did the most to move their head coaches that much closer to returning to the Bed and Breakfast business.You're a long-snapper. You only have one job, and it's an important one. It's also a job borne out of repetition and mindlessness -- you crouch, you grab the ball, you fire it backwards. Over and over and over again. After so many reps, muscle memory kicks in and you don't have to think about it. You shouldn't think about it, either, because thinking instead of just feeling it through gets you in trouble.
But Chicago Bear long snapper Patrick Mannelly wants to be a thinker. He wants to call shots. He wants to be seen and heard. (You need a pretty high degree of self-importance to create a website called Longsnapper.com, dedicated to establishing yourself as an authority on the subject.) This, as you might have guessed, hasn't turned out well so far in the 2009 season.
It was Mannelly's decision to go with a direct snap to Garrett Wolfe on a 4th-and-11 fake punt in Sunday night's game against the Packers, with the Bears up 12-10. The Bears could have punted, given the Packers about 40 yards to get into field goal range, and relied on a defense that had thus far stymied Aaron Rodgers even without the presence of Brian Urlacher to protect the lead
But a light bulb went off in Mannelly's head. He saw something he thought the Bears could exploit. So he instead snapped straight to the oblivious Wolfe, who caught the ball, wondered what the hell was happening, and got four yards before the Packers tackled him. Though they picked up 15 yards of offense on the ensuing drive, the Packers didn't have to do anything -- Mannelly's botch put them already in field goal range. His hunch was a bust.
The Bears eventually challenged the punt, claiming the Packers had 12 men on the field (they didn't). If this was the reasoning behind Mannelly's decision -- a fire drill audible to catch the Packers sleeping and pick up five free yards -- it was misguided, five yards would have only made it 4th-and-6. More likely, he thought he could exploit the Packers' playcall with some strategery, figuring Wolfe would have a gap to the first down. Think again.
The Packers' go-ahead field goal wasn't the end-all of the contest; the Bears answered right back before the Packers eventually won on Greg Jennings' touchdown catch. Who knows if Chicago would have won if they had punted, but Mannelly's decision made it a lot easier on the Packers to keep pace.
You can certainly look at Jay Cutler's four interceptions as the coach-killing performance of the game (and it certainly doesn't reflect well on Lovie Smith that his new toy was such a disaster in his first game), but the Bears were still in position to win the game after three of Cutler's picks. And then Mannelly happened.
For Smith, whose team has been .500 over the last two seasons and is facing monstrous expectations, coughing up division games in front of the nation because of a rogue long snapper is not the way to further your job security.


















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-15-2009 @ 2:42PM
VeRonda said...
A disaster he might have been, but it wasn't all Cutler. I can imagine Lovie is probably pounding his bald head on his desk. But, from that pounding I hope he sees that the blame goes beyond Cutler... he wasn't the only one abandoning his routes.
Reply
9-15-2009 @ 2:50PM
melpremium said...
Re Mannelly, he's been great for a long time. How about Mickey, the Mope AKA Lovie Smith,when the Packers are leading 10-2. Bears score making it 10-8. Does Lovie go for 2? Of course not. Someone should have told Lovie that the 1-Point conversion made the score 10-9. If the Bears went for 2 AND MISSED, a field goal still would have won it. Lovie is the worst game coach in the NFL, second to none. Mannelly made a mistake...Lovie is a walking mistake.
Reply
9-15-2009 @ 4:10PM
th said...
...& if they miss the two point conversion & the Packers score another TD then the Bears are down by nine & it's a two score lead....
It was too early for a two point attempt.
Though basically I agree....
...about Lovie the dummy...
Reply
9-16-2009 @ 8:23AM
Brody said...
Mannelly made a smart decision based on the facts that he thought he had. It just turns out he blew it by not noticing that Matthews was already off the field.
It wasn't about the 5 yards the penalty would net. It was about the free play. If the Pack had 12 men on the field, then Mannelly could snap the ball to Wolfe - if he picked up the first, awesome. If he didn't, no big deal - they'd challenge that there were 12 men on the field and then punt anyway. That's what you call a "Win-Win" situation.
The problem is...there weren't 12 men on the field. If Mannelly had snapped the ball 2 seconds sooner, his plan would have worked. I don't imagine this is something he came up with on his own. It's probably a strategy that his coaches have taught him - "If you think there's 12, snap to the up man and take the free play."
Reply
9-21-2009 @ 11:19PM
ConfortiElectric said...
Mannelly who?? thats right the guy has received no press for almost 11 years he is the perfect long snapper BUT that was a pretty funny play go bears!! seabirds are dead meat on sunday!
Reply