
This is how it works in Oakland: Al Davis makes all the decisions. Most of them are short-term. You know the slogan -- "Just Win, Baby!" It's a great rhetoric, just like "The Greatness of the Raiders Will Continue In Its Future (sic)," is a hollow promise and grammatically challenged, all at the same time.
And while so many of these headline-grabbing transactions send the Black Hole crowd into delirium, recent history proves they are like putting a new spark plug into a blown engine.
At first glance, the Raiders' latest blockbuster deal, acquiring five-time Pro Bowl defensive end/tackle Richard Seymour from the New England Patriots for Oakland's first-round pick in 2011, looks like Davis just made his team competitive in a sad-sack AFC West.
That's the knee-jerk reaction. Then, slowly, reality sets in, and you realize that -- like those front-row concert tickets you scored on Craigslist that turned out to be counterfeit -- most triumphant Raiders swaps this decade have blown up like an exploding cigar.
What looks good today:
-- Seymour is 29, coming off a season in which he matched his career-high with eight sacks. He was a vital cog in all three of the Patriots' Super Bowl championship teams since landing in New England as the sixth overall pick in the 2001 NFL draft.
-- The AFC West is a wasteland, with the exception of the San Diego Chargers (yes, even in the wake of the latest Shawne Merriman fiasco). There are rookie head coaches and chaos reigning in Kansas City and Denver, and a newbie coach in the Raiders' Tom Cable, who is being investigated by the Napa, Calif. police after allegedly attacking and breaking the jaw of assistant coach Randy Hanson during a coaches' meeting in early August.
-- The Raiders defense was 31st in the NFL during the preseason and last against the run, allowing a staggering 192.0 rushing yards per outing while the team finished 1-3. Seymour is great off the edge and a talented run stuffer.
-- With an extension to the collective bargaining agreement between the owners and the players, a lockout is entirely possible in 2011. The Raiders may have just surrendered a first-round pick for a season that could see limited or no NFL action.
The reality of what just happened:
-- Seymour is entering the final year of a contract that will pay him $3.685 million. There is no indication that the Raiders made this deal with a a new contract provision attached. That means Seymour, in all likelihood, will walk away in 2010. Even though the NFL is bracing for no salary cap next season, the Raiders' days of throwing bags of money at players are dwindling, only because the owner is cash-poor.
-- Since reaching the Super Bowl in 2002, the Raiders have, in ascending order, picked 31st (CB Nnamdi Asomugha in '03); second (OT Robert Gallery in '04); 23rd (CB Fabian Washington in '05); seventh (S Michael Huff in '06); first (QB JaMarcus Russell in '07); fourth (RB Darren McFadden in '08); and seventh (WR Darrius Heyward-Bey in '09).
It's a fair bet that Bill Belichick just landed a top 10 draft pick for a player he loves but likely would not have re-signed. Why? Belichick has a knack for cutting the cord on players he thinks may be in decline, and he loves to reload through the draft. Whose instincts do you trust here, Belichick's or Davis'?
-- Seymour turns 30 in a month. He is still an elite player -- in the Patriots' 3-4 defensive scheme that is loaded with talent and character. There are indications from NFL scouts that his speed is waning and his big playmaking days may be behind him
. How will Seymour fit on a 4-3 defense that will have 34-year-old Greg Ellis on the other side? Will he still play end? Will he move inside? -- Seymour just left the NFL's most efficient football operation and lands, without warning, into the lap of the NFL's most dysfunctional. How will this sit with him? Already, multiple NFL sources are saying Seymour is telling people around the league he is reluctant to report to Oakland.
There are some notable high-character guys with the Raiders -- Asomugha is the best cover cornerback in the NFL and is a team-first player, as is All Pro punter Shane Lechler -- but the franchise's lack of leadership and oversight shows on game days when penalties run amuck and opponents run wild.
Already, Ellis, the former Cowboys linebacker who signed a three-year free agent deal with Oakland, has lashed out at his teammates' lack of discipline and commitment.
"Guys, you can't stay out all night," Ellis fumed after the Raiders surrendered 536 net yards (232 rushing) in a 45-7 exhibition loss to the Saints. "Can't expect to come in here and just turn it on. This isn't high school or college football. This is the best of the best in the NFL. So you've got to do those small things that you maybe didn't have to do in college."
In a perfect world, Seymour comes to Oakland and helps change the culture. Then again, Asomugha and others before him have tried. And failed. Ellis, as you can see, already appears to have raised a white flag.
The Raiders, crippled by Davis' autocratic decision-making and barren personnel department, appear too far gone to expect one outstanding player addition to restart a clunker of a franchise, even in a turnaround era where worst-to-first has become less startling.
Good luck, Richard. Here's a bit of advice as you make the move to Oakland -- rent. Don't buy.


















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
9-06-2009 @ 4:29PM
BatmanSr said...
Al Davis has always been stupid...except when he hired Madden to coach, years ago. Madden was an asst.coach at San Diego State,under Don Coryel way back in 1950's. Madden worked for Davis for about 10yrs, and we "Charger" fans hated him :)
Reply
9-06-2009 @ 9:13PM
ivo610 said...
Always been stupid? How so? He went from an assistant for USC to an NFL owner. Yeah he clearly has always been "stupid". overall you will not find another NFL owner with as much pure football knowledge as Al Davis. Sure he has gone off the deep end the past decade but if you look at his body of work, it speaks for itself. And this is coming from a Packer fan.
9-06-2009 @ 5:06PM
mkscorpion3283 said...
Blah, blah, blah. Oakland sucks, the Raiders are a joke, yeah, yeah, we've heard it before. You so-called "sports media" will never give the Raiders credit for anything. When from a football standpoint, this was a good move.
Reply
9-06-2009 @ 5:54PM
George said...
How on Earth could this be considered a good move? They get Seymour for 1 year in exchange for a probable top 10 draft pick. But then again, we've seen how Al Davis uses his draft picks. Maybe this was a good move after all.
Reply
9-06-2009 @ 6:26PM
David said...
Fools, this was a great decision.
Reply
9-07-2009 @ 3:31AM
aareyes6 said...
Raiders have nothing coming to them as long as Al Davis has the reigns. When he becomes simply an owner and hires a GM and a coach and sits back and watches, then just maybe, maybe, they'll do something.
9-06-2009 @ 6:57PM
Fran said...
The most stupid thoughts and unfounded reasoning I have read from a so called media writer. And I hate the Raiders!!!!!!
Reply
9-06-2009 @ 8:45PM
janandrick84 said...
Let's see if they can sign him then judge the deal in a year. He sure has to help this year.
Reply
9-06-2009 @ 8:55PM
aben444 said...
Hi Nancy,
It's your buddy from NYC....you said it yourself
"-- The Raiders defense was 31st in the NFL during the preseason and last against the run, allowing a staggering 192.0 rushing yards per outing while the team finished 1-3. Seymour is great off the edge and a talented run stuffer."
I don't care about next years draft, a top 10 pick that nobody wants to pay.....can't even trade that pick because it would cost a team millions which you said it yourself the raiders don't have.
the raiders have been unwatchable on defense the last few years...we have some hope now that the younger players on the raiders can stepup.
regards,
Angelo
Reply
9-07-2009 @ 11:48AM
majorhardon420 said...
YOU GUYS ARE RIGHT THIS MAKES SENSE RICHARD MAY HAVE 200 TACKLES ...BUT ITS A LITTLE CALLOUS OF BELLYCHEAT HES STILL A GREAT PLAYER,AND THIS FROM A MIGHTY STEELER ROY TITUSVILLE PA
9-06-2009 @ 9:35PM
Clarence said...
the raiders aint ntn..its all about The TRI-STATE..NY GIANTS BOII!....YEUUUUU!!!
Reply
9-06-2009 @ 9:43PM
tyrekyoung said...
Thank You Raiders for making the patriots a dynasty for the next few years to come. the raiders will most likely finish the season 3-13 and guarantee themselves a top 3 pick in the draft. there has not been a better team or orgniazatin at drafting players on defense and picking up offensive players than the patriots. and with manning looking like he is on the decline and the inconsitency of the bengals, browns, chargers and etc, i don't see no other team except the steelers challenging them. well at least my team finally got rid of GERM Edwards
Reply
9-07-2009 @ 11:58AM
majorhardon420 said...
YOU ARE RIGHT THE MIGHTY STEELERS WILL CHALLENGE BELICHEAT AND THE PATSIES..LETS SEE TOMS TOUGHNESS THIS YEAR WHEN HE MEETS DEBO AND THE WRECKING CREW ALSO BIG BEN IS MUCH YOUNGER THAN BRADY,AND OBVIOUSLY MUCH TOUGHER,HES A BIG MAN, TOMMYS KINDA FRAGILE LOL,BENS 6.5 265 CONSERVATIVELYSO ILL TAKE PITTSBURGH...THE PATRIOTS WILL MISS THAT GUY WHEN A YOUNGSTER GOES DOWN THAT THEY WERE DEPENDING ON
9-06-2009 @ 10:35PM
hazmathauler said...
To all you RAIDER haters all i have to say is 21,29,12,15,11,9,20,80,2,81,89!!!!
Reply
9-06-2009 @ 11:24PM
nevadamoxie said...
The Raiders will never, never, ever have a good team until lamebrain Davis retires. His personal vendettas against so many players over the years have cost the Raiders dearly. Ask Marcus Allen for example. If he lives much longer look for the Raiders to go bankrupt. That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it.
Reply
9-06-2009 @ 11:28PM
BIG BAD BEAST said...
SORRY TRADE, THE RAIDERS GAVE UP ON BURRGESS 2 WEEKS AGO AND SHIPPED HIM TO THE PATS FOR BASICALLY NOTHING, NOW THE RAIDERS GET A 29 YEAR OLD FOR THE REMAINDER IF HIS CONTRACT (1) YEAR, THIS YEAR. THAT PICK IS GOING TO BE A TOP 5 PICK. PATS JUST ROBBED THE CRAP OUT OF RAIDERS AND SEYMORE WILL BE BACK IN NE FOR THE 2010 SEASON.
Reply
9-06-2009 @ 11:39PM
wdfisher57 said...
I think Al Davis has seen better days, but his career and in fact Raider history is as good as anybody in the leagues. The Raiders owned the 70s in my opinion, even with Pittsburg winning all those Super Bowls. The immaculate reception was a game changing fluke, and probably the most outstanding situational ad lib in NFL history. Only the old Vikings were beaten out on more unluckier plays, the immortalized hail mary by Roger Staubach long ago. The Bills get an honorable mention for being just as unlucky too. But that does not diminish Raider history or greatness in my opinion, and I am an old Oiler /AFC fan. I hated Pittsburg, yet felt they were a very good team. This also goes for the Raiders and even the Cowboys, something which I hate to admit and will deny having ever said so. Recently its been the Patriots. Its all cyclical anyway. One day the Raiders will be great again, all those high draft picks will even out eventually. Go Texans.
Reply
9-07-2009 @ 7:27AM
taros68 said...
Wow what a great move,I mean at least AL did not give them next years 1st choice also,this was a bad move but at least its only 1 pick
Reply
9-07-2009 @ 8:01AM
tyrekyoung said...
Just heard a rumor that the pats are going to use the pick and try to acquire Brandon Marshall OMG. That would definately make the pats the favorite to win it all for the next three years. WHY? WHY? WHY? YOU SUCK RAIDERS!!!!!
Reply
9-07-2009 @ 10:12AM
John Lyons said...
Nancy, Why is the focus of being the bad guy always on the Raiders and Al Davis. Why not right a column on the cheating SOB Bill Bellichick. Al Davis will be remembered as as a straight forward football man that has contributed much to the game. Bill Bellichick might be remembered, but no likely. Nancy, what do you really know about the "Greatness of the Raiders?" You were probably in diapers when they were ruling the league year in, year out. Stop with you pathetic bashing of one of footballs greatest team and distinguished owners. The Raiders on on the upturn and many other teams are on the down turn. Get off, and stay off.
Reply