Texans cornerback Dunta Robinson is the last franchise-tagged player to neither agree on a long-term deal nor sign his tender. Wednesday was the deadline for franchise players to sign long-term deals with their teams. This could get ugly.So far, both Robinson and the Texans have failed to comment on the deadline passing. Negotiations had been mostly quiet, but the last time Robinson spoke about his contract, he said if a long-term deal couldn't be reached, he wasn't going to be around until sometime during the season.
For every game missed, Robinson would lose $585,705.
At around the same time as Robinson's comments, Gary Kubiak said that the cornerback told him that he "could count on him."
That the Texans and Robinson could not work out a deal isn't surprising. Assigning a value for Robinson is difficult given a 2007 ACL/hamstring injury, and his own assessment that he wasn't playing at 100 percent last year.
Originally, both Houston and Robinson spoke of their desire to get a long-term deal done -- the problem has been value. Leaked information suggested that Robinson was offered "Chris Gamble-type money" in the range of $23 million guaranteed, but that this offer was refused.
Things got ugly in February when Robinson was franchised. He claimed that GM Rick Smith lied to him about franchise tagging him and felt "betrayed." Smith explained that he didn't want to franchise tag him but that it was always a possibility if the sides couldn't agree on terms.
Statistically, Robinson was the worst CB for the Texans last year, though they did go 7-4 when he was in the lineup. Given the inexperienced secondary, Robinson may still be a player that they will want to have on the field. Robinson just needs to sign his franchise tender, like the other tagged players who hope to get a better contract in the future. Sitting out the offseason isn't preparing him to impress for his next contract.
His agent, Jason Chayut on the other hand, may disagree because in the past he has called the franchise tag "exploitation." Put me first in line to receive almost $10 million dollars of exploitation.


















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-16-2009 @ 5:46PM
James Martin said...
I agree with the Texans placing the franchise tag on him. I would have a hard time signing him to a long term deal till I see how his leg holds up for an entire season. I also heard that he did not sign his tender because he wanted a "Haynsworth" guarantee that he would not be franchised next year. I'm not sure I would make that deal either. If you franchise him next year because a deal could not be made, you could still get something in trade for him.
Reply
7-17-2009 @ 11:00AM
ScottytheMenace said...
Millionaires and billionaires like this punk Jason Chayut need to stop claiming exploitation when the contracts they negotiate are in the millions. Dunta is not struggling to feed his family against an oppressor. Most people in this country don't earn in their lifetime what Dunta earns in a single year. I don't begrudge anybody trying to maximize their contract, but if Dunta doesn't publically distance himself from that statement I will lose a lot of respect for him. As you say. PLEASE exploit me with $10 million. I beg you, EXPLOIT me.
Reply