
It's July, the slowest month of the year for the NFL, and it's driving you nuts. You need a fix. A hit. Anything NFL to pull you through the dog days. FanHouse is here to help with an in-depth look at each division that should have you plenty prepared for training camp. We're calling it the Summer Scramble. Today we look at some burning questions in the NFC North and offer a ridiculously early prediction for how the teams in the Black-and-Blue Division will finish.
How good can Percy Harvin be (assuming he can stay on the field)?
Good enough to revive Brett Favre's career and make the Vikings a Super Bowl contender. Minnesota already has the offensive foundation in the form of Adrian Peterson and the league's best running game. It has a strong offensive line. Assuming the Vikes are smart and creative enough to take full advantage of it, the addition of Harvin's athleticism and big-play potential to the running and passing attack (heck, he could play QB in whatever wildcat-type scheme they come up with) should have a major impact on everybody else on the field.
Harvin (above) comes with baggage -- plenty of questions about his health and how much he cares about being great. That's why he was still there when the Vikings were picking at No. 22. But the Vikings decided he was enough of a talent to be worth the risk. It's a worthwhile gamble for a team that has plenty of pieces already in place and is looking for something that can elevate them to an elite level. The Vikings come with questions on defense (especially once these two clowns finally do get suspended), but so does every other team in this division. Minnesota already has one weapon (Peterson) that none of the others can match. Harvin has the talent to be another.
Can Ryan Grant carry the load for the Packers in the backfield?
What are we to believe about Ryan Grant? Is he the eight-touchdown, 5.1-yards-per-carry fantasy team maker of 2007? Is he the four-fumble, 3.9-yards-per-carry disappointment of 2008? And if he's something in between, is that good enough to support a Packer passing game that looks to be the best in the division? It certainly doesn't bode well that Grant's production suffered when he was given a full season's worth of feature back duty. It's possible that improved stability in the interior of the offensive line will help. It's possible that Grant learned some things from his difficult 2008 season and will be an improved back for it. It's possible that Brandon Jackson could see an increased role and take some of the load off of Grant. But it's also possible that none of those things happen, that Grant has the same problems he had last year, and the pressure all falls on Aaron Rodgers and the passing game. Which might not be a disaster, but it's certainly not the ideal.
Do the Bears offer Jay Cutler enough supporting pieces?
It doesn't look that way, no. There's a chance that Devin Hester could develop into a top receiver with Cutler throwing to him, and he's likely to lean hard on Greg Olsen, but there's no way that the Bears' WR corps can approximate what Cutler was working with in Denver. In addition, while Matt Forte fills his workhorse role well, the Bears lack the kind of game-breaking rusher that would distract opposing defenses from the threat Cutler's arm poses. It's also worth noting that Cutler was playing behind a strong offensive line and against some rotten AFC West defenses when he was in Denver, and he still threw more interceptions (18) than anybody in the league except that Favre guy. Things are going to have to go very well around Cutler in Chicago if he's to have the kind of impact the Bears expected when they got him, and there seems to be a lot that could go wrong.
Can the Lions be this year's Dolphins?
Well, that's the hope, isn't it? A team that went 0-16 last year has to look for inspiration to a team that went 1-15 in 2007 and won its division a year later. This is the NFL, and anything can happen, but while the Lions will be improved (don't they have to be?), it's hard to imagine them repeating Miami's miracle turnaround. They feature one of the league's true superstar talents in WR Calvin Johnson. They have a solid running game. They're going to be better on defense, at least in the backfield and in the linebacking corps. Brandon Pettigrew could prove to be an inspired draft pick -- a highly skilled tight end who should be a benefit to whichever quarterback they use. The new coaching staff brings a fresh voice and perspective where those are desperately needed. And assuming he does win the QB job, Matthew Stafford is a talent about which to be excited. But to go from 0-16 to contention, the Lions would need to answer some of the glaring issues on their offensive line. And it's going to take more than one active winter to turn that defense from what it was last year into anything decent. Detroit is bouncing back from rock bottom, but they're a long way from the top.
RIDICULOUSLY EARLY PREDICTED ORDER OF FINISH
1. Vikings (11-5): Favre liked handing the ball off to Thomas Jones last year. He's going to love handing it off to Peterson.
2. Packers (8-8): Cutler has the hype, Stafford the money, Favre the resume. But the Packers have the best QB in the division.
3. Bears (7-9): If it's any consolation to Cutler and Bears fans, things are going to be much worse in Denver.
4. Lions (5-11): That's a five-game improvement, people! That's huge!
Tomorrow: AFC North Position Battles to Watch
Friday: AFC North Burning Questions and Prediction
Tuesday, July 21: NFC South Position Battles to Watch
Wednesday, July 22: NFC South Burning Questions and Prediction


















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-15-2009 @ 10:49AM
John said...
My "RIDICULOUSLY EARLY PREDICTED ORDER OF FINISH" is a bit different. I think it will be more like this:
Vikings - 13-3 (Will go 6-0 in division)
Bears - 9-7
Packers - 6-10 (Rodgers will miss several games with a injury)
Lions - 6-10
Obviously, if the vikings don't go 6-0 in the division and if Rodgers can make it through all 16 games, my number will be off.
Lions
Reply
7-15-2009 @ 11:03AM
John said...
In case you are wondering who the Vikings will lose to, I think they will lose two out of three between Pittsburgh, Arizona, and Carolina. They also will rest their starters during the final game with the Giants and lose, but maintain home field advantage.
Reply
7-15-2009 @ 12:37PM
Tony said...
The Bears 7-9? They missed winning the division last year by the skin of their teeth! They had Kyle Orton at QB. If they had finished against Atlanta,Tampa or Carolina they would have won it out right. Coaching,not players cost them those games! Jay Cutler is a huge up grade at QB and hopefully Lovie Smith will be more involved making defensive calls,this team should go at LEAST 10-6!
Reply
7-15-2009 @ 1:16PM
brianpb6300 said...
That is funny--everyone will be down on the entire division this year. The NFC North will be more competitive than people think. The Vikings are a one man show in A.P. everyone thinks Favre is the savior--he hasn't even signed yet.
The Bears with Cutler are stronger and the receivers will be just fine. The defense will be the key for the Bears this season since the offense maybe more balanced than it has been in recent memory.
The Packers will be a good football team this year. With Rogers as the starter and a good supporting cast--as much as I hate to say it the Packers have a solid offense. The defense is tough but not division winning.
The Lions will bounce back and have a 5 win season they have a lot of rebuilding to do and have a good nucleus of young players and vets.
NFC Division Prediction:
Bears 11-5 - the Bears have the offense to go with the defense now. Plus the Bears have the best Special Teams in the division.
Vikings 10-6(WC) - with or w/o Favre the Vikings are not as good as advertised.
Packers 7-9 - They will have another late season collapse.
Lions 5-11 - An improvement with a young team and a new coaching staff.
Reply
7-15-2009 @ 2:48PM
John said...
The only way the Bears can go 11-5 is to beat the Vikings twice. I don't think that will happen.
7-15-2009 @ 2:49PM
nc0gnet0 said...
Vikings.....11-5-9/7 good team on paper but with the suspensions looming, Favre controversy, and still somewhat one dimensional running attack, I think they are getting to much credit. Sure, alot of things could go right, but alot could go wrong as well.
Bears 9-7 to 8-8 Devin who? Bears will win most of the low scoring games but have difficulty putting points on the board.
Packers 9-7 to 7-9 Packers will look like world beaters one week and terrible the next. The ghost of Favre and Grants inconsistancy will give Rodgers fits.
Lions 6-10 to 4-12 Still 2-3 players away from being a contender in this division. They will however be suprisingly competitive and have an easy schedule.
Reply
7-15-2009 @ 5:45PM
Swandog said...
I doubt that Chicago will be worse this season. They've upgraded at QB, and their only downgrade is at safety, which I think they'll be able to cover. Certainly Orton to Cutler is a bigger gain than Brown to Steltz is a downgrade. And they didn't particularly play over their head last year, and the schedule should be easier, so I see more wins for the Bears.
The question in my mind is then whether Minnesota can be as good or better than last year. It wouldn't surprise me if they were, but I could see them slipping too. But I would expect those two fighting for the division, with the Packers being a contender but falling short.
Reply
7-15-2009 @ 5:56PM
thecla923 said...
This is oddly reminiscent of last season when everyone predicted the Bears to have a losing season. They then miss the playoffs by a game, vastly improve their offensive line and quarterback, and plug up some other holes and they're supposed to get worse, with an easier schedule?
Okay.
Reply
7-15-2009 @ 10:25PM
nathanfrigerio said...
Go Bears
Reply
7-15-2009 @ 11:41PM
DKoz said...
Whoa..whoa...Bears 7-9, Pack 7-9 and the Purple with the worst QB situation in the Division at 11-5. In general the three teams mentioned above have a decent chance at better records in 2009 due to the fact we play the AFC North and the NFC West. The AFC North has two good teams and two lousy teams in OHIO! Cincy and Cleveland will be lucky to go 2-6, 3-5 against our division. Do I really have to get into the NFC West incompetency! Their division was won with a 9-7 record!! You have two pro bowl caliber QB's in Chicago and GB. With Greenbay's offensive weapons and Chicago's D and special teams they both have a shot at 10 to 11 wins! The Vikequeens will be lucky to make the wildcard! Pulease!!!
Reply
7-16-2009 @ 12:15AM
lm109as said...
The Vikings also have an easy schedule this year, so they will be better. The Bears defense cost them a chance to make the playoffs last year (remember the Houston game?). The Vikings are getting E.J. Henderson back, so they will actually upgrade their defense. Cutler had all his yards against a very weak AFC West, and I'm sorry, but the Bears receivers are not even close to being as good as Denvers. The Vikings will win at least 10 games and the Bears will struggle to be over .500. The Packers will be there at the end and could surprise. Records: Vikings 11-5/10-6 Packers 10-6/9-7 Bears 9-7/8-8 Lions 7-9/6-10
Reply
7-17-2009 @ 3:07AM
gino said...
denvers WR two are three years ago who knew any of these guys denver did not have a running game they passed the ball most of the time. look at there numbers after cutler became the starter some one here said the 6th best in history in yards. THE QB made the WR better why can,nt he do it for the bears
7-16-2009 @ 9:59AM
DKoz said...
Nice try.Im109as...you should have made this post before you go into the "spiked" purple kool-aid. Nice job rolling out the #1 and #2 cliches used by the media and opposition fans why Cutler will not improve the Bears. #1. No one to throw to. #2. Last years stats are an abberation due to the weak AFC west. #1. Two points to consider here; Brandon Marshall had the 6th greatest increase in recieving in NFL HISTORY the year Cutler took over for Jake Plummer. The Bears have several candidates primed for break out years. Bears actually passed for more yards than the Vikes last year...who is Favre going to throw to?? #2.Yeah Cutler passed for 4500 yards last year but he also passed for 3500 yds. the year before when he played the NFC North. I know you hope he is not legit. As I stated earlier the Vikes have the worst QB situtation in the North. QB's in the NFL is the same as pitchers in MLB. You seldom win without good performances from that position.
Reply
7-17-2009 @ 2:54AM
gino said...
what team in the north got better this off season? gb is changing its D to a 34 and dont have the right personal. lions are the lions the vikings dont have QB as of now two of there starting d line will face some time off for suspensions and only won the divison by two game. the bears got three new O line men, a new OLB the best D line coach in the game and a top 10 QB. this team where 9-7 last year.after all they did in the off season you can,nt see them win one or two more games this year?
Reply
7-21-2009 @ 4:06PM
Woody said...
Damn, all you guys trashing the Bears sound like you've been watching too much ESPN. You are repeating exactly what they are saying. ESPN is horrible. Don't you know that? Does anything ever happen that they predict? Not hardly. Especially, who they say will win championships!
I want to know why the Philadelphia Eagles get picked to do so well every year? Why? They're not that good. If Philly was smart. They'd get rid of McNabb. He's a world class choker! Bears will be better this year. Minnesota is way over hyped. They'll do decent this year. I hope Farve comes back and embarrasses himself and Childress gets fired. I mean.. come on. You really think they'll go to the Super Bowl if they get Farve? Please, he's only going to tarnish his legacy even more if he comes back. It's all bitterness and ego he's riding with now. He's washed up. On good hit on him and he's crippled for life. This whole act is in Desperation of the Vikings. They have two horrible quarterbacks that if they brought in damn near anyone. They'd be better then what they haven now. What have they been thinking. Let's build this great team and then say. "Oh wow. we never thought about getting a good quarterback here. " Whops... Let's just get Grandpa Farve in here. Then we'll win it all! LOL
Reply
7-22-2009 @ 6:15PM
BornReady said...
Here is a simple question.
How many other teams out there would take Favre as their starting QB? The Jets had one of the worst QB situations out there and let him go so what does that say about the consensus? The Vikings were the only ones pitiful enough to take him.
How many teams would take Cutler for their QB? The Denver Post counted at least 10 teams who contacted the Broncos as you can see from this link taken straight from a Vikings website: http://thevikingage.com/2009/03/20/more-than-ten-teams-interested-in-cutler/
So why is it that the Vikings succeed and improve by getting a 39yr old quarterback who won't even commit to the team until August that wasn't wanted by any other team in the league?
Why is it that a 26yr old 3-time Pro Bowl quarterback (that 1/3 of the league openly wanted) reunited with WR Earl Bennett who has the most receptions in school history is considered a downgrade? Neglecting the fact that the Bears add a HOF tackle and the Vikes lose a HOF center and your assessment looks fairly weak.
Reply