After clarifying "The Brady Rule" on Tuesday, the NFL continued its assault on unnecessary roughness by passing four safety proposals at the league's annual owners' meetings. Among the rule changes is a ban on "wedge blocking," as well as regulations on blindside blocking and the hitting of defenseless receivers. There is also some new rules designed to make onside kicks safer.
At some point, you have to ask when the NFL is just going to say the heck with it, and tie flags around the player's wastes and ban tackling all together. I can understand wanting to take action on hits to the head, leading with the helmet, and similar acts of violence. But wedge blocking? Seriously? Is this what it's coming to?
From ESPN's John Clayton:
After watching years of tape, the Competition Committee felt the wedge was causing too many injuries. Starting this fall, no more than two receiver team players may intentionally form a wedge to help the returner. The penalty is 15 yards and will be enforced from the spot of the wedge. It will be called if three or more players line up shoulder to shoulder within two yards of each other to lead the blocking.I wonder what's going to happen when the NFL notices an increase in injuries to kick returners because they no longer have a wedge in front of them, resulting in gunners charging down the field and crashing into them at full speed. Another rule change, no doubt, or perhaps the elimination of kickoffs all together and drives automatically starting at the 20-yard line.
Among the other changes:
The Hines Ward Rule: We'll call it "The Hines Ward Rule" because it came as a result of his devastating block on Cincinnati's Keith Rivers, which knocked him out for the remainder of the season. The league will now be issuing 15-yard penalties for blindside hits to the head or neck using the head, forearm or shoulder. I still think Ward's block on Rivers was a good, clean football hit, and that if he didn't suffer a broken jaw there probably wouldn't be a rule change. It's unfortunate he was injured, but in a contact sport like football, injuries are unavoidable and new rules are not going to change that.
The Onside Kick Rule: Again, from John Clayton: at least four players of the kicking team must be on each side of the kicker. Second, at least three players must be lined up outside each inbounds line, including one who must be outside the yard-line number.
In other words, onside kicks will be nearly impossible to recover.
The Defenseless Receiver Rule: Under the old rule, the NFL only looked to eliminate helmet-to-helmet hits on defenseless receivers. Now, it's going to be tossing flags at shoulder and forearm hits to the head or neck area on a defenseless receiver.
Again, as I said earlier on Tuesday, I'm not looking for a free-for-all on the football field where anything goes, and I can understand the thought process behind the blindside hits and defenseless receiver rules (though, I think they're very misguided pointing to the Hines Ward-Keith Rivers play). However, the special teams rules, along with the over-the-top protection of quarterbacks, is a bit much. Especially when the NFL will turn around and market the very hits it's supposedly banning.



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-24-2009 @ 9:55PM
DAVE HALL said...
are these guys plaing football or tennis? some of the newer rules are ridiculous. these guys make big money let them play for it....
Reply
3-25-2009 @ 9:23AM
Michael said...
Its time for the NFL to recognize the real change must come with the dimensions of the Football field. Players are bigger and faster but the field is still the same. I know they don't want to look like they are copying Canadian Football but stop changing how physical the game is and add a 10th of a second to react by making the field bigger.
Reply
3-25-2009 @ 9:23AM
myra said...
Hines ward and the steelers will have to find a cleaner way to play. the refs will have to find other ways to help them win.
Reply
3-25-2009 @ 10:57AM
psu74dl said...
Myra, That was the dumbest comment I have seen here in a while. Do you even know anything about the game of football? Because if you did you would know that hard hits are part of the game, and once you start taking the hard hitting aspect away, you take away the spirt from the game. The Steelers have not played dirty, they have played within the rules. They are the most respected franchise in the NFL, starting from the Owner to the Waterboys they show nothing but class. So please before you post another stupid comment like the one you just posted, study and become more informed of what you are talking about.
3-25-2009 @ 9:23AM
tonya said...
After further review...why are we watching anyway?...rules for hoodlums usually means prison...always loved football and am almost at my limit with all of the nonsense.......
Reply
3-25-2009 @ 10:16AM
svetahor said...
Football back in the 1950s and 1960s was a blue-collar sport. Richies and women really didn't attend or watch. (Born after those decades? Watch The Greatest Game Ever Played by ESPN to catch up.) It was just good old-fashioned football. I remember the classic hits on Frank Gifford (1960 by Chuck Bednarik) and Y.A. Tittle (1964 Giants vs. Steelers).
However, the NFL has marketed the game to get more to watch. Now, white-collar workers and a lot of women watch or attend the games. The NFL passes rules under the guise of "protecting the players." This is only a half-truth! The other reason is to calm an increasingly squeamish audience. Simply put, the more people who watch, the more tame the game must of necessity become.
I am not disparaging white-collar workers or women. However, their ideas of violence are a lot different than those of the old mill worker who hunted and fished and enjoyed an old bar fight now and then.
Several more decades and American pro football may come to rival international football (soccer) in its tameness!
Reply
3-25-2009 @ 11:10AM
Pimp Daddy said...
I don't know whats becoming of the N.F.L(which stands for Not For Long).Everytime some pretty boy gets hurt they want to change their rules.first they wants to protect the QB,thats what the offensive line is for.Now they wants to ban wedge blocking.Who gonna protect the return guy.The league will now be issuing 15-yard penalties for blindside hits to the head or neck using the head, forearm or shoulder. If you can't use the forearm or shoulder how is you suppose to hit a guy,do you kick him.
Reply
3-25-2009 @ 11:13AM
Trogdor said...
The onside kick rule was adopted by the NCAA a few years back. Do you happen to know the effect it's had on onside recovery rates? From what I've seen, it hasn't really affected things too much, but some actual statistical evidence would be nice.
Reply
3-25-2009 @ 11:32AM
kevin said...
Did anyone else notice that it was the steelers shown more for these cheap hits? I guess "wines harder" will have to actually make clean hits!
Reply
3-31-2009 @ 7:51PM
Dlmc said...
HaHa. Wines Harder...good one Kevin...NOT! Hines is one guy who never "wines". It's the people he hits and their jealous fans who do the all the "whining". Do you EVEN watch football? So I guess now he will have to scream "look out, I am coming to hit you" before he makes a tackle so he doesn't "blind side" someone who is stupid enough to not pay attention to what is going on around him...what a joke!
3-25-2009 @ 12:24PM
Tony said...
At the rate they're going it will be the OWNERS that "KILL THE GOOSE THAT LAYS THE GOLDEN EGG"!!
Reply
3-26-2009 @ 7:39PM
dan said...
this is becoming a joke. are pretty boy quarterbacks gonna get a flag in there favor if there hair and nails get mussed up or they get there uniform dirty?
hey its a tuff game thats why women dont play the game.
if you have the ball your gonna get hit.
you get 10 mil a year. deal with it
Reply