If quarterback Matthew Stafford is going to be the No. 1 pick at the NFL Draft in April, then Thursday is a critical day. Stafford, who did not take part in passing drills at the league's scouting combine in February, will be the featured attraction at Georgia's pro day in front of a multitude of scouts -- including, of course, representatives from the Lions.While quarterbacks often sit out certain drills at the combine (though it's worth noting that Southern Cal's Mark Sanchez participated), Stafford's decision immediately led to questions about the impact on his draft status. He's still expected to be one of the first guys off the board, but Detroit's opinion on him may be changing. For one thing, since the combine, Detroit reportedly engaged in talks with Denver about Jay Cutler's availability, hinting that the Lions may not see what they want from a QB at the No. 1 pick.
In addition to that, just recently, a Lions beat writer in Detroit speculated that the team would select a left tackle -- either Baylor's Jason Smith or Virginia's Eugene Monroe -- if it held onto the top spot. And Monday, Wake Forest linebacker Aaron Curry visited Detroit, where the coaching staff impressed upon him how successful he could be at a starting middle-backer spot, should he join outside guys Ernie Sims and Julian Peterson in the Lions' linebacking corps.
All of this speaks to the fluidity in the draft's build-up, as teams frequently update their prospect boards, and occasionally sandbag a bit in hopes of coercing a trade. Detroit has certainly not tipped its hand, even when Stafford himself visited Michigan on March 10.
Still, it's not overestimating things to say that Thursday could make or break Stafford's hold on the No. 1 spot. His "tutor," Terry Shea, who was the Rams' quarterbacks coach under current Detroit offensive coordinator Scott Linehan, believes that Stafford will show himself quite worthy of being the first name called in New York.
"I would think he'll knock the lights out," Terry Shea said. "I can't believe there's a better No. 1 pick than Matthew Stafford in this year's draft. ... He's as accurate a passer as you could possibly find with a ball that whistles through the air. It's not like he throws a soft ball. He throws a very catchable ball. But it just whistles. He's just got that pinpoint ability in his throwing skill."Should Detroit bypass Stafford at No. 1, it's possible that the result could cost the former SEC standout several spots in the draft and millions of dollars. The team that once was most likely to take him should Detroit balk, Kansas City, no longer has any need with Matt Cassel on board. After the Chiefs select at No. 3, it's harder to find a franchise needing a quarterback -- you can possibly look at Cleveland at No. 5, Jacksonville at No. 8, San Francisco at No. 10 or Buffalo at No. 11, but Detroit's need for a signal-caller surpasses any of those teams.
Everyone's very interested to see what happens at Georgia on Thursday. The NFL Draft's entire first-round path may hinge on the outcome.



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-19-2009 @ 10:07AM
Skrying said...
Build the offensive line and sign Cutler and you have an instantly good offense. Draft Matt Stafford and you have an instantly ruined first draft pick.
Reply
3-19-2009 @ 1:55PM
lazyindiankid4 said...
Now don't you think that was kind of a ignorant statement? I agree that Cutler would be a better pick for the Lions because he has already proven that he is a successful QB, However, give Stafford a break man. He hasn't proved anything yet. Let him come in the league and then judge the kid.
3-19-2009 @ 8:05PM
Skrying said...
Give him a break? For what? I didn't put him down in any way. It is the most extreme of rarities that a college player comes into the NFL ready for the NFL game. It takes a strong organization and coaching staff to build a top draft pick into a top professional. Stafford could be a great player one day but as of right now he wouldn't fair well. The Lions are not the organization to help a player make the transition in a successful manner. That is exactly why I said a "ruined first draft pick" and not a " poor player."
3-20-2009 @ 3:57PM
lazyindiankid4 said...
My bad man, I think I misinterpreted what you said on your first comment. Yea I agree with everything you just said.