NFL

Chicago Media Still Showing Classy Side Concerning Rex Grossman

If you decided to visit the Chicago Tribune home page Thursday morning, you found the main story online is a countdown to when the Bears will "finally" cut Rex Grossman from the team. No, not just the sports page; the main page. It's more of a story than your latest Blagojevich news, two Illinois soldiers being killed in Afghanistan, and a discussion of President Obama's health-care plan. Grossman was apparently more newsworthy.

Attached to the "Countdown to Rex-ile" -- where it discusses fans "rehearsing" their "toasts" -- you'll find a story by David Haugh where he discusses how unfair Grossman's treatment has been in Chicago. Gee, I wonder where these fans are getting it?

Many fans are smart, but the masses were continually fed vitriol about this polarizing quarterback in the newspapers they read daily on the CT Subway for the past three years. Is it any wonder they began to harbor ill-will towards him the next time he had a remotely bad game?

You can trace Grossman's demise back to the Bears' 2006 campaign. He led the team to a 13-3 record in the regular season, yet throughout the entire second half of the season the Chicago media was crying for a new quarterback. Whether it was the newspapers, talk radio, television, or the internet: He can't lead this team to a Super Bowl, they shouted. Well, he did. Last I checked, it's the only Super Bowl in which the Bears have participated since the 1985 shufflin' crew.

Early the next season, it was evident Grossman could no longer lead the team. His confidence was shattered. It's easy to point to the big dollars pro athletes make and say something ignorant like, I wouldn't care what people thought if I made that much money. Doing such a thing is dismissing the fact that they are human beings. If you really want to put yourself in Grossman's shoes, ask yourself what you'd be thinking after 2006. You hold a 17-6 regular season record and took the team to the Super Bowl in your only full season as a starter. You know what I'd be thinking? What the #$%& do you people want?

If the masses want to dismiss the job Grossman did in 2006, they'll claim the Bears won in spite of him. It's true the defense and special teams -- namely Devin Hester -- were spectacular. To do so, you'd be overlooking the fact that Grossman still threw for over 3,000 yards and 23 touchdown passes in the regular season, including a long one to Bernard Berrian to jump-start the season-opener in Green Bay. You'd also be overlooking his 282 yard, one touchdown performance against the Seahawks -- which included a clutch pass to Rashied Davis to set up the game-winning overtime field goal -- in the playoffs. You'd also be overlooking his game-breaking touchdown pass to Berrian in the NFC Championship game -- one the Bears won with ease.

At this point, I'm not even discussing the Bears need for him. A parting of ways was needed for both sides. He could have never succeeded in Chicago moving forward. Unlike many Bears fans, I'll be rooting for Grossman to succeed elsewhere -- unless he's playing against the Bears. He deserved better than this.

I understand Grossman had many downs, but he had plenty of ups as well. At some point everyone just needs to turn the page and leave him alone. This countdown is more than just a bit amateurish. He's a human being, and the Tribune is a professional news outlet.

The bottom line is he was the first quarterback since Jim McMahon to lead a team to the Super Bowl. As beloved as McMahon was, Grossman was equally as bemoaned. You could justify it a bit easier if he was a bad guy, but he's not. I guess it's fitting he gets a classless dismissal day from the media. Why would February 26, 2009 be any different than any other day Grossman spent in Chicago?

Related Articles

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)