NFL

Not Even Lions Want Michael Vick

The Falcons are trying to trade Michael Vick. Can't say I blame them. The club probably isn't expecting any legit offers -- and, in all likelihood, they'll end up releasing him -- but it doesn't hurt to ask. Vick, the 2001 first-overall pick, is currently in federal prison on a multiple puppy murder conviction, but could be a free man in time for the 2009 season.

But like the other 30 teams, not even the Lions are interested in Vick's services. And this is the same outfit that won exactly zero times last season. Part of the reason, certainly, is because Vick doesn't solve the team's current quarterback situation.

At this point in the proceedings, he's more Devin Hester than Steve Young or Donovan McNabb. Some combination of Jon Kitna, Daunte Culpepper and Matthew Stafford are better options than Vick, which should become a familiar refrain form other organizations this offseason. Either way, disaster averted.

What about Stafford, though? Conventional wisdom has Detroit using the No. 1 pick on the Georgia quarterback, and some people even think that he should immediately be installed as the starter. Like, for example, CBSSports.com's Pete Prisco:
[Stafford] can do for the Lions what Matt Ryan did for the Atlanta Falcons. OK, so the Lions won't make the playoffs next year. But he can get them moving in that direction.

Stafford is the real deal. The only player who I can see pushing him out of that top spot is USC quarterback Mark Sanchez. The Lions need a franchise passer.
Pete Carroll disagrees with you about Mark Sanchez, Pete, and he's obviously an unbiased observer. As for Stafford, here's the thing: unlike the Falcons, a team that went 8-8 in 2006 before Bobby Petrino willed the team to three victories a year later, the Lions have won 30 times since 2001. There hasn't been the slightest sign that the organization was turning things around during that eight-year period.

Matt Ryan obviously came into a tough situation, but nothing like what Stafford could face in a few months. That's not to say the Lions shouldn't take him if they think he's in the club's best long-term interests, just that nobody should expect Stafford to do for the Lions what Ryan did for the Falcons. Not as a rookie, anyway.

Related Articles

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)