If you're a Steelers fan, you're probably wishing that the Steelers would run the ball more. If you're a Steelers fan who is happy with Pittsburgh's run-pass mix, I want to meet you, because you're part of a rare breed.It's part of the Steelers identity: Pittsburgh wins by running the ball and playing tough defense, and any other approach is left to less physical and less worthy teams. We want Jerome Bettis bowling over Brian Urlacher in the snow for the game-winning touchdown, with an occasional trick play thrown in there just to keep defenses honest.
But there have (obviously) been no Bettis bowling games, and very few long Willie Parker runs this year. The Steelers have even gotten rid of the trick plays. So it's not surprise that offensive coordinator Bruce Arians is considered the axis of evil in Pittsburgh. This year's Steelers have thrown the ball more than they've run, they've struggled to run the ball at all. Oh and Ben Roethlisberger has gotten sacked way too often.
Now this isn't a defense of Arians, but if you want to criticize the Steelers offensive coordinator, criticize him for the Steelers lack of offensive production this year, not because he hasn't run the ball enough. Right now, Arians is thought of as the heretic who calls way too many passes. But the last year previous offensive coordinator Ken Whisenhunt was in Pittsburgh, he called runs on only 45.05 percent of the Steelers' offensive snaps. This year, Arians has called runs on 45.32 percent of Pittsburgh's offensive plays.
| TOUGH RUNNING | |||
| Category | Att | Yards | Avg |
| Wins | 328 | 1255 | 3.83 |
| Losses | 93 | 260 | 2.80 |
| Playoff Teams | 176 | 544 | 3.09 |
| Bad Defenses | 105 | 476 | 4.53 |
| Avg Defenses | 135 | 514 | 3.81 |
| Good Defenses | 192 | 576 | 3.00 |
| Crappy defined as a defense that allowed 4.5 yards per carry or worse. Average defense are teams that allowed 4.0-4.5 yards per carry, while good defenses allowed 3.9 yards per carry or less | |||
But even in 2005, the Steelers got pass happy when it counted. In the first half of their four playoff games, Pittsburgh ran the ball on only 40.6 percent of their snaps--although they did run the ball much more in the second half of those games as they took the air out of the ball.
So while everyone may complain about the Steelers' tendency to air the ball out, it's not particularly out of character. That 45-55 run-pass ratio for 2008 is low by Pittsburgh standards, but it's only the third lowest run percentage since 2000, behind 2006 and 2003 (when the Steelers offensive line fell apart).
What is different is how bad the Steelers are when they do try to run the ball. Pittsburgh's average of 3.7 yards per carry is 29th in the league this year. It's the only the fourth time in the past 20 years that the Steelers have rushed for less than 4.0 yards per carry. So where the previous Steelers have used defense's fear of their running attack to catch them off guard, this year the Steelers don't have the running game for opponents to worry about.
The Steelers' rushing troubles are actually worse than what I've explained. In their seven games against playoff teams, Pittsburgh rushed for 544 yards on 176 carries, an average of only 3.1 yards per carry. The Steelers did rush for 124 yards against the Chargers (with a 4.4 average per carry), but that's the only time the Steelers have rushed for 100 yards or more against a playoff team. It's safe to say that if you average 3.1 yards per carry, you're not going to win by calling for more running plays.
So Arians has done what had to be done, with a $100 million quarterback, three good wide receivers and a quality tight end, he has turned the offense over to Ben Roethlisberger and hoped for the best.
It's worked at times--like when Roethlisberger threw for 309 yards and no interceptions against the Chargers or when he threw for 308 yards, three touchdowns and one interception against the Jaguars. It's also failed terribly when he threw four interceptions against the Giants or three interceptions against the Colts (although one came on a final Hail Mary). And overall, it's resulted in one of the worst Steelers' offenses in recent memory.
| THROUGH THE YEARS |
|||||
| This year's Steelers' offense ranks among the worst of the past 20 years, as judged by average yards per play. |
|||||
| Year | Avg. Run |
Avg Pass |
Avg. Play |
Run Pct. | |
| 2006 | 4.2 | 7.7 | 5.5 | 45.05% | |
| *2001 | 4.8 | 7.3 | 5.5 | 54.46% | |
| *2002 | 4.1 | 7.3 | 5.4 | 46.67% | |
| *2005 | 4.0 | 8.2 | 5.4 | 57.19% | |
| *1995 | 3.7 | 6.9 | 5.2 | 44.50% | |
| *1997 | 4.3 | 6.9 | 5.2 | 54.06% | |
| *2007 | 4.2 | 7.7 | 5.2 | 51.10% | |
| *1996 | 4.4 | 6.6 | 5.1 | 52.40% | |
| *2004 | 4.0 | 8.3 | 5.1 | 61.07% | |
| 1990 | 4.1 | 7.1 | 5.0 | 50.84% | |
| *1992 | 4.2 | 7.1 | 5.0 | 52.38% | |
| 1991 | 4.1 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 43.06% | |
| *1994 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 4.9 | 52.10% | |
| *1993 | 4.1 | 6.7 | 4.9 | 45.51% | |
| *2008 | 3.7 | 7.1 | 4.9 | 45.32% | |
| 2003 | 3.3 | 6.7 | 4.7 | 43.73% | |
| 2000 | 4.3 | 6.2 | 4.7 | 52.23% | |
| 1999 | 4.0 | 5.8 | 4.6 | 46.39% | |
| 1998 | 4.2 | 5.7 | 4.5 | 48.32% | |
| *1989 | 3.6 | 6.6 | 4.2 | 52.36% | |
| *Made Playoffs | |||||
Maybe a healthier Willie Parker or a newfound focus on the fullback will suddenly fix the running game, but it's probably a safer bet to count on more of the same and try to figure out how to win anyway.
Against playoff teams, Pittsburgh has had some success when it spreads out and airs the ball out. Against playoff teams, Pittsburgh's scoring drives have come when they run the ball 42.6 percent of the time, even less than
So as the Steelers begin their playoff run, they are struck with an awful lot of difficult decisions. Pittsburgh has maybe its best defense since the Steel Curtain, and we've all been told that defense wins championships. But to go with that, the Steelers have an offense that is not well suited to mesh with a dominant defense.
The 2000 Ravens are an example of how a defense (and special teams) can carry a poor offense to a title. The Ravens averaged only 4.7 yards per offensive play that year, but they did run the ball well with Jamal Lewis (1,364 yards and a 4.4 yards per carry). Baltimore basically asked its offense to not turn the ball over, burn some clock and take advantage of advantageous field position that an outstanding defense would give them. It didn't always work that way--quarterback Trent Dilfer threw an interception in all but one of his regular season starts. But when the playoffs rolled around, Dilfer threw only one interception in four postseason games.
The Steelers don't have a solid running game to burn the clock. And Ben Roethlisberger been prone to interceptions in addition to sacks. But we know that Roethlisberger can protect the ball--he threw one interception in a five-game stretch this season. But if he doesn't protect the ball this postseason, Pittsburgh will not be making his third trip to the Super Bowl since the 1970s.
If he can run a mistake-free offense, maybe they can. And if they do, it may be because the running game pulled off an amazing resurgence, but it's just as likely that the Steelers will pass their way there--because they have little choice.




















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-08-2009 @ 9:57AM
Craig said...
Beautifully put my friend. Maybe Dick Hoak can suit up for a game.
Reply
1-08-2009 @ 11:05AM
NFL FAN said...
With all the bad pass blocking and sacks the Steelers have taken......you would thing their offensive coordinator would be smart enough to change play calling. Looks like he is trying to get Ben killed out there. It is very painfull to watch that offense struggle. When will Tomlin take control of a bad situation???
Reply
1-08-2009 @ 1:13PM
BG said...
Perhaps it is not the play calling but rather WHEN the play is called. Count the number of times Ben hikes the ball when the clock is between one second and zero. WAAAAY too many times. Often over 50% of the time. Against Baltimore recently Ben tried to throw an out to Holmes near the goal line but was severely rushed into throwing it into the ground essentially. On the replay you can see at least THREE Baltimore players moving forward BEFORE the snap......which occured as the play clock hit zero. Talk about giving away your snap count!
Arizona was bragging about how helpful it was that Ryan didn't vary his snap count last game. The Steelers have been doing it all year. And they wonder aloud why the no huddle seems to work so well against them in the second half of their first game and again later against other teams. DuuuHHHH How about a little variation in when the ball is snapped. Even the best offensive line will have little chance when the defense has a step and is nearing top speed before they can even move.
1-08-2009 @ 11:59AM
drobviousso said...
Most of the people I watch the games with now are bitching that
1)We are too predictable
2)We are running too often
First down can be a passing down too. We've had way to many 3&longs after two dumb runs up the gut.
Reply
1-08-2009 @ 12:22PM
Bobby said...
Who edits these posts?? You make great points but some of them have words in them that don't fit!
Reply
1-08-2009 @ 12:45PM
Toni Fitch said...
You forgot to mention that the reason the Steelers' offensive line is so offensive is because the orginization has failed to make any improvements in that area. Even with Alan Faneca, they still gave up well over 40 sacks the in his last two years. After losiing Faneca to free agency, they failed to draft an offensive lineman that even suited up this year (Tony Hills).
Reply
1-09-2009 @ 5:01PM
DAVID said...
The Steelers are who we thought they were! Or something like that!, just asx Denny Green.
Reply
1-08-2009 @ 2:50PM
ultimatefootballnetwork said...
Wow. Not one mention of Mewelde Moore.
When is someone...anyone....going to figure out that the Steelers run game has been good-to-very-good with Mewelde Moore in the backfield.
Another year goes by and no one can figure out how good Moore is.
Reply
1-08-2009 @ 8:46PM
turkey man said...
You are exactly right!!!!!!!!
1-08-2009 @ 8:46PM
RAEANNE said...
Way too many missed opportunities inside the 10, preferably ALL the times we failed to score by running the ball up the middle on the 1-yard line! Let Ben call more plays!!!
Reply
1-08-2009 @ 9:13PM
Kyle said...
The offensive line has barely been able to hold it together this season, but they've making (limited) progress with the (lack of) talent they have. They've been trying to get the ball out of Ben's hand quicker, which is not his style. But he has been adjusting to it. The key against SD is gonna be protection, protection, protection. PLEASE no repeat of 3 more yards!
Reply
1-08-2009 @ 9:13PM
Thatsabsurd said...
Bruce Arians "baby" is the two Tight end set and neither TE can block on a run play much better than my little sister.
We are not making it in the run game because Bruce Arians is a bumbling idiot.
Reply
1-08-2009 @ 10:15PM
NFL Rules said...
How to fix it:
1) More play-action inside the 10-yard line.
2) More of Moore inside, less of Parker outside.
3) Vary the snap count.
4) More short pass routes.
5) More passes on first down.
Reply
1-09-2009 @ 11:01AM
Darryl Taylor said...
..Play action seems to give a team "options"..and put the defense on their heels....running into a crowd gives you 1 option...p.s.....what ever happend to that goal and 1 play where they just dive over the line....like sweetness used to do?...you don't have to land on the ground,just break the goal line....jump on the pile a have another player push you....seems easy...
Reply
1-09-2009 @ 7:51PM
t said...
So do statistics tell you how often Ben held onto the ball for 4-5+ seconds, allowing pretty much *any* defense to get to him? And do the stats explain how this "terrible" run game equated to a 12-win season, a #2 seed in the playoffs and yet another 3000+ yard year for Ben?
Statistics are impressive to a lot of folks becuase *most* people would never have the patience to sift thru all the numbers. More importantly- statistics are completely unable to tell the whole story of anything. Numbers can be interpreted in virtually any way, and to support any given position.
The facts are that Ben has won a lot more than he has lost in the post-season, and has had some big games in the playoffs. Especially against other QB's deemed "hotter" or just better than him. He even has the biggest tackle in the history of the QB position (see playoffs vs. Indy '05).
I'm not delusional. I think Ben has a bad habit of letting the play clock run down; he tends to hold the ball too long looking for "homerun" deep throws; he fails to scramble for easy first-downs too often this year; he doesn't look (to me) like he understands the defenses like Tom Brady, Peyton Manning or even Phillip Rivers; he doesn't take short passes unless it's late in a game, on a game-winning drive. He's too cocky. He gets over-excited early in big games, often leading to picks. He gets "hurt" too often. He likes attention maybe a little too much for my preferences.
So- he isn't perfect in my eyes, by any means.
But Roethlisberger DOES play winning football, plays through injuries, takes hard hits, thrives under adversity, has a world-class arm, breaks tackles/sacks, escapes same, throws accurate passes generally, and has won more pro football games than ANY other QB through his first 5 years. Including a SuperBowl.
Despite the media, and America's, love for the underdog the Steelers have a good team, a great defense, and a very good QB. A Pittsburgh win will require good footbal by the Steelers. Nothing is easy in the post-season. If SD wins, it will be because they earn it. I, for one, hope they don't, but anything is possible.
Just not *likely*.
Reply