NFL

Creepy Catfight: Al Davis vs. Chris Mortensen -- Somebody's Fibbin'


(photos courtesy of Getty Images)

ESPN's Chris Mortensen seems mild-mannered enough. But apparently, there are only so many times you can accuse a guy of bearing false witness before he snaps. Or maybe that just applies to Al Davis, who appears to take great joy in refuting Raiders-related rumors, no matter how obvious or innocuous they may be.

Yesterday, Gretz pointed out that the Raiders disputed Mortensen's report that Davis was attempting to sell off a portion of the team. Seems harmless enough, right? WRONG.

Raiders executive John Herrera said that "once again, for reasons known only to him, Mortensen has fabricated a story which has no basis in fact." And then he punched an unsuspecting media member in the face to bring home his point. Okay, that didn't really happen, but it might've tempered Mortensen response if it had.

In an e-mail to the AP, Mort offered this:
"The Raiders have lost the privilege with me of running stories past them for comment ... This stems from their history of denials to most stories I have reported -- as well as others in the media -- when those stories have eventually proven to be true. The latest example is I reported that Al Davis planned to interview Giants offensive coordinator Kevin Gilbride and, of course, the story was trashed by a team spokesman."
Fantastic. Seriously, that's brilliant.

To be fair, I suspect Mort was sufficiently work up by the Herrera's comments (although, frankly, I have no idea why; don't the Raiders have a history of doing this?), and he just fired off a response before thinking through how truly ridiculous he sounded. Which explains the follow-up:
"Upon further review, I should not have qualified any potential communication with the Raiders as a 'privilege.' I'd say they have repeatedly diminished and discouraged efforts to reach out for an official comment based on the repeated denials of prior stories ... It also would be an assumption on their part that I have not had any contact with the Raiders while reporting on this story."
Good times. In the scheme of things, this is hardly a big deal. Despite Mort's initial proclamations, the Earth won't fly out of orbit, and I'm pretty sure people quit taking Al Davis seriously back in the '80s.

Not everybody's having a good chuckle over this, though; Silver & Black Illustrated's Michael Wagaman has been covering the Raiders since 1995 and he's quite familiar with the front-office stonewalling. But that doesn't excuse Mort temporarily going off the deep end:
Saying the Raiders have "lost their privilege" of having Mortensen run his stories past them for comment is both childish and, even more to the point, terrible journalism. From day one in this business, I was taught that there are always two sides to every story and, whether you agree with them or not, it is the basic duties of a qualified journalist to print both sides. ...

Even [his follow-up statement] doesn't hold water because Mortensen said in his first statement that the team had lost its privilege to have him run stories past them for comment. Yet in his follow-up, he says it's an assumption on the Raiders part that he didn't have any contact with them while reporting on the story.

Which is it, Chris? Did you have contact with them or were you not seeking them out for comment because they lost that privilege?
I'm guessing that's privileged information. Call it a hunch.

Related Articles

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)