It's entirely arguable that the way the New York Giants played in Week 17 against the Patriots, despite losing, propelled them into the postseason and eventually to a Super Bowl win.Of course, you could also argue that such a discussion is pointless. Whatever. My main point is that Tom Coughlin typically -- as he wrote in a book -- does not believe in resting players in the final week of the season if there's nothing at stake.
"It is a difficult decision," Coughlin wrote after noting that many NFL coaches bench their stars in similar situations. "It becomes clear that the media and fans care more about a playoff game and therefore don't want our first-teamers to play. But I feel differently."Naturally, then, you would expect to see every single Giant -- including Justin Tuck and Brandon Jacobs, both recently banged up -- playing full games against the Vikings this Sunday. Or perhaps not; it appears, judging by the somewhat hemming nature of a recent statement to the media, that Coughlin might have changed his tune.
"My answer to all of your questions will be that in conjunction with the medical people and with the idea of improving our game, having individuals perform at a higher level than we did in the last game, which is always our theme, we will do the best thing for our football team," Coughlin said."What's best for the Giants" and "Play every game like it's win or go home" are two entirely different statements. And while Coughlin isn't the type of guy to go back on his word, I don't think, he would be doing exactly that if the Giants don't pull out all the stops to beat the Vikings on Sunday.
Of course the most intriguing aspect of that game is that the Bears need a Giants win in order to have a shot at the playoffs ... and considering the broad effect that this game will have on the NFC playoffs as a whole, it'll be interesting to see what Coughlin ultimately decideds to do.
It's also interesting to remember that playing his full team against the Pats last year gave them valuable experience in Phoenix; it would be incredibly ironic if the Giants sat players against the Vikings and then later got booted from the playoffs by Minnesota.



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-24-2008 @ 7:59AM
Martin said...
I think you are grasping at straws here, as there is a big difference in not playing healthy players for fear they will get injured as opposed to not playing injured players so as to give them an additional week to heal.
Reply
12-24-2008 @ 8:56AM
Tony said...
I agree, why risk playing Jacobs against the best run D for a game that means nothing. If Jacobs were to get injured and out for the playoffs he would have a lot "splainin ta do." Rest them Tom.
The Vikes have had 8 INTs, 4 went for TDs in the last 2 years against the Giants. Remember last year Tom, 4 picks, 3 Tds and 5 sacks.....Rest Eli, Jacobs and the rest....HEEHEE
Reply
12-25-2008 @ 5:54AM
K Smith said...
Coughlin was absolutely hammered by the media for playing to win in Week 17 last year vs. the Pats. He started everyone, and although they lost 38 - 35, it planted the seeds for a Super Bowl championship.
If you're afraid that you'll get hurt, you're playing the wrong sport.
Reply
12-25-2008 @ 1:08PM
Shane said...
If you're playing guys that are hurt, then you are stupid!
If guys are banged up and nothing is one the line.
You don't play them.
The medical staff will make it easier for this to be undestood this week.
Reply