OK, quick quiz. You're an NFL head coach. Your team has to win its final five games to have any chance of a playoff spot. Trailing by six, you're facing a fourth and 19 at your own 10 with 2:06 to go. You have two timeouts left, and you're facing a team with a running back who has already rushed for 100 yards on the day.Do you:
a) Call for a Hail Mary play where you send everyone deep, heave up the ball and hope that you get either a lucky long catch or a pass interference penalty.
b) Send a couple of guys deep, but run a short comeback route with one receiver, have LaDainian Tomlinson trail behind them on a hook and ladder, hoping the trick play surprises the defense.
c) Go max protect, send two guys into the pattern and hope that with forever to throw the ball, someone gets open.
d) Punt, and hope that you'll get three quick stops, using your two remaining timeouts to get the ball back with one minute to go. You'll then drive the 80-90 yards you need with no timeouts and get the game-winning touchdown as the final gun sounds.If you've got a brain, you'd chose a or b, maybe even c or anything but d. If you're Norv Turner, you chose d, then scratch your head at how poorly it worked out. The punt ran the clock down to the two-minute warning, then the Falcons got a first down on two running plays, which allowed them to run out the clock.
If the Chargers' front office is thinking things through, it's pretty clear that this "offensive genius" (seriously, his strength is supposed to be his feel for calling an offense) has given Chargers fans plenty of reasons to miss Marty Schottenheimer. Schottenheimer may have turned to jello come playoff time, but hey, the Chargers aren't even going to make the playoffs under Turner.
There's no real rational explanation I can figure out for why the Chargers head coach believed that punting would be doing anything other than kicking away the team's last chance at a playoff spot. Admittedly the Chargers offense was pathetic all day to the tune of 201 yards--but that was going to still be the case even if the Chargers did figure out a way to stop the Falcons and get the ball back, the only difference would be the utter lack of time to drive the field. But by punting with 2:06 to play, Turner was somehow thinking that the chances of getting a fluke play on fourth and 19 was less likely than stopping the Falcons and then driving the length of the field (the Falcons got the ball after the punt at the Chargers 42).
But the more likely answer is that Turner hadn't really thought through the probabilities. With Warren Sapp saying the Raiders didn't practice the two-minute offense when Turner was the coach, that seems more likely. Coaches who call their own plays are especially susceptible to this, because they don't have enough time to be thinking through the clock management while also figuring out what play to call. Given five minutes to think it through, even Turner would have probably figured out the right answer, but he only had 45 seconds to decide, and he got it wrong.



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-30-2008 @ 10:40PM
Nate A. said...
Norv Turner is an offensive guru. He was responsible for the Cowboys of the '90's winning Super Bowls. However, he is a terrible choice for a head coach. His ineffectiveness in that role has been on display for years. He is not head coach material. The Chargers organization made a tremendous mistake handing their team off to this guy.
Reply
11-30-2008 @ 10:51PM
Cheri said...
Turner is a complete idiot. There is a web site
Fire Norv Turner aka FIRENORV.COM
However Spanos the Charger's President is even a bigger idiot.
Some history, my parents were Raider fans, I am a Denver Broncos fan and my fiance is a Charger fan and I am coming to his defense today. San Diego's NFL-best 14-2 season was wrecked in a playoff loss to New England last season, Spanos cited the exodus of both coordinators and other assistants in firing Schottenheimer, who had a year left on his contract.
Spano explained "Our fans deserve to know what changed for me over the last month," Spanos said in the statement. "When I decided to move ahead with Marty Schottenheimer in mid-January, I did so with the expectation that the core of his fine coaching staff would remain intact. Unfortunately, that did not prove to be the case, and the process of dealing with these coaching changes convinced me that we simply could not move forward with such dysfunction between our head coach and general manager. In short, this entire process over the last month convinced me beyond any doubt that I had to act to change this untenable situation and create an environment where everyone at Charger Park would be pulling in the same direction and working at a championship level."
Good Judgement there Spano.....Sorry Charger fans they just extended his (Norv Turner's) contract to 2009.
Reply
11-30-2008 @ 11:01PM
bob c said...
Lets see now Marty got fired for losing a single playoff game with what season record? Now Norv Turner can,t even have a winninng season and the front office thinks he,s wonderful. Norv might be a good offensive cord. but like good old Wade Phillips head coach he isn,t. The Chargers front office wins the BONE HEAD of the century award hands down.
Reply
11-30-2008 @ 11:49PM
tom h said...
the chargers need to dump the gm smith & turner. the gm made a poor decision to fire marty schottenheimer. the knock against marty was that he couldn't win the big one. don't forget he does not play football only coaches. the players need to step up, unfortunately, you cannot fire the team but these guys make some big money so they should start earning it in a better way.
Reply
11-30-2008 @ 11:56PM
Spoonman said...
Well, there is reasoning behind it poor decisions. His defense has played awful since he became the coach (which is, his fault). Turning the ball over on the 10 would guarantee the lose. And the offense played so bad they would need 1 play in the 4th that was about 10% of their overall play the rest of the 58 minutes of the game.
Why are we looking at one play? Turner has been awful with this team. Firing Marty never made sense, and signing Turner didn't either. Had the team actually been competent on either offense or defense (short of one Finneran assisted pick 6), who would you give the ball to? Your inept defense or inept offense? One would lead the Falcons to a certain touchdown, while the other leads to a most probable shot of the Falcons killing the clock for the win.
I don't know the correct answer; I also don't know the correct answer of the best way to get out of the hole I have dug myself into. I think the question would be: What did you do wrong to get into this whole? As opposed to: What did you do wrong to not get out of this whole.
Plus the Falcons are the real deal. Chargers will need more than 200 yards of offense to win a game (unless they play the Raiders). Give it up to the Falcons, who outplayed the Chargers on every part of the ball, even though the Chargers got some favorable calls and nice turnovers (those are not mutually exclusive). No question, the Chargers had every opportunity to put up a fight. They did not, Falcons played the better game, and this one call did not cost the Chargers the game (even though Turner is an idiot).
Reply
12-01-2008 @ 12:18AM
Matrix said...
Like Warren Sapp said, Norv doesn't have 2 minute offense in his scheme. So What do you expect?
Reply
12-01-2008 @ 8:41AM
Cal said...
Norv has been head coach of few teams already and those teams were all losers under him as head coach. So now, the chargers will for sure be one of the teams added to the list of loser because Norv Turner is the head coach.
Reply
12-01-2008 @ 11:24AM
steelers4life said...
norv is probably a good person but as a coach im sorry to say he SUCKS,to bad i really like the guy but he can screw up a good wet dream
Reply
12-01-2008 @ 4:26PM
SJ of SD said...
Well, I have to add to what is obvious to everyone except the chargers decision makers. This guy has more job security then police, fire and physicians who will ALWAYS be in demand and needed! Not sure just because Norv is buddies with the guy in charge makes a damn bit of difference, business is business and that means WINNING, not lossing which it seems is the only thing Norv is good at, his history speaking for itself.
Someone that has no real success in the past is not the right person to champion a team that was doing much better before he got his hands on them. I wish I could have seen Norv's resume and what was in it that made the GM say, "Oh yeah, we gotta have this guy", "He is the only one to bring the Chargers to the playoff's and do better then MARTY did!"
I am a female who has follwed football and baseball for years and I have to say I speak for many of loyal San Diego fans, we are tired of MEDIOCORE sports!!! The players being the blame for the lack of cash and integrity from the one's making the deals is just wrong. The fans support the players when we see the people in charge are doing what is best for the team, what if anything has Norv done in the best interest of the team, please tell me!
Stop our San Diego team/teams from circling the drain due to pin head know nothings! It seems they wouldn't know a good decision if it fell out of the sky, landed on their faces and started to wiggle!
We are hurting not having Merriman and L.T is off his game but not totally, it starts from the TOP and the head coach has to GO and they have to get a guy that SHOULD BE ON TOP based on performance, winning performance!
Reply