
Sorting the Sunday Pile looks back at the NFL weekend that was. It's also an unofficial Mittens blog.
We witnessed history Sunday afternoon. Jeff Reed's last-second field goal to give the Steelers an 11-10 win over the Chargers was the first time in the universe's existence -- something like 12 million games -- that the final score of an NFL get-together has ended 11-10. Except for the part about the final score being 11-10.
As you've probably seen by now, San Diego had time to run one offensive play after Pittsburgh took the one-point lead. With the ball deep in their territory and only five seconds on the clock, the Chargers dusted off the ol' "lateral and hope." LaDainian Tomlinson caught a short pass from Philip Rivers, tried to lateral it to Chris Chambers -- as it turned out, it was an illegal forward pass -- who then attempted to lateral it to either Marcus McNeill or Rivers. I couldn't tell because Troy Polamalu came out of nowhere, knocked the ball down before scooping it up and rumbling into the end zone as time expired.
That makes the final 17-10, right? Well, according to the rules, yes. But according to Scott Green, the referee, no, no it doesn't.
First, the ruling, as explained by NBC's Cris Collinsworth during halftime of last night's Cowboys-Redskins game:
"The first of those dipsy-doodle things was ruled an illegal forward pass that should not have ended this play. So this should've been a Pittsburgh Steelers touchdown. But despite the fact that point differential is the seventh tiebreaker, this score will not be changed."
To clarify: "dipsy-doodle things" is the technical term for "lateral," and "the fact that point differential is the seventh tiebreaker, this score will not be changed," is another way of saying, in your Norv Turner voice, "ha ha, degenerate gamblers, now YOU know what it feels like to get screwed by the officiating."
And then there's this choice nugget, which is sure to make Mike Pereira, head of NFL officials, very happy: "After the game, referee Scott Green said the officials realized afterward the touchdown should have counted, though it wouldn't have affected the result."
By the way, did I mention that the spread was Steelers -4.5?
Gambling issues aside (and I can say that because I didn't have anything on this game -- apparently, I was the only one), I'm just curious: when does the league step in to overturn blatant missed calls that take points off the board? The sixth tiebreaker? How about the fifth? Or maybe the fourth? It's an idiotic notion, really. Because the there's virtually no chance the Steelers' season will come down to point differential, the NFL, at least to hear Collinsworth tell it, are happily willing to pretend like nothing happened?
Look, I'm not naive enough to believe that this doesn't has everything to do with the spread and absolutely nothing to do with any tie-breaking scenarios. But the bigger issue -- other than Polamalu might be getting screwed out of end-of-year contract bonuses tied to fumble recoveries and touchdowns -- is that Green doesn't know the freaking rules. I mean, it's not like he missed a holding call, or signaled roughing the passer when he meant intentional grounding. Green didn't know that an illegal forward pass doesn't end a play. That's embarrassing as hell.
On the upside, Green won't likely be punished for his incompetence, but there's a great chance Steelers defensive end Brett Keisel will get fined for sacking Philip Rivers "with malice in his heart" or whatever Ray Anderson and his henchmen are calling it this week. Solid.
And I eagerly look forward to Rich Eisen not asking Pereira about all this during Wednesday's "Official Review" segment on "Total Access." Should be not fun.
The Ravens Still Haven't Beaten Anybody
Last April, when the Ravens drafted Joe Flacco with the 18th-overall pick, the plan was to have him spend his rookie season on the sidelines. Baltimore's previous franchise quarterback, 2003 first-rounder Kyle Boller, was to battle Troy Smith for the starting gig.
Didn't work out quite as planned; Boller ended up on injured reserve with a bum shoulder and Smith contracted a virus that knocked him out of commission long enough for head coach John Harbaugh to anoint-by-default Flacco the Ravens quarterback. This story might sound familiar because it was the one i was telling in Week 5, when Flacco was playing less like a fresh-faced, wide-eyed kid from Delaware and more like what I imagine Brian Billick envisioned the Ravens Next Great Quarterback might look like. Ironically, Billick's not around to ruin Flacco.
Yesterday against the Giants, the rookie was fine; he completed enough passes for Baltimore to keep it close, and even rushed for 57 yards. Unfortunately, the Ravens' defense, which is annually among the best in the league, got manhandled. And it started early.
On Brandon Jacobs' very first carry of the afternoon he ripped off a 33-yard gain, and by the time the first quarter had ended he had gone for 70 yards. The Ravens, on average, give up 65 rushing yards a game. But it wasn't just 6-4, 264-pound feature backs that gave Baltimore fits, it was also 5-11, 228-pound, change-of-pace back Derrick Ward and occasional third-down-back Ahmad Bradshaw -- all 5-8, 198 of him -- who ran roughshod over a suddenly aged-looking Ravens bunch. For the day, the Giants racked up 207 rushing yards, which prompted defensive end Trevor Pryce to offer this frank assessment:
"It was a thumping. It's the biggest thumping I've been a part of for a long time ... Even the Indianapolis game didn't feel like this one."
Where do the Ravens go from here? According to the schedule they'll host the Eagles. More generally, though, Sunday's browbeating served as a sobering reminder: Baltimore is obviously much improved from a year ago and Harbaugh deserves some credit for the quick turnaround. But the media going into full-on hype mode after the 6-3 start might've been a tad premature.
For starters, the Ravens had a ridiculously easy first half schedule beating the Bengals, Browns (twice), Dolphins, Raiders and Texans, and losing to the Steelers, Titans and Colts before running into the Giants. And there are still three NFC East teams left to play, not to mention a rematch with Pittsburgh.
This isn't to take away from what Baltimore has accomplished through 11 weeks, just to point out that while records are swell, who you beat to amass said record is sort of important, too. And through two and a half months, the Ravens haven't beaten anybody.
Tony Romo's Nine Fingers > Brad Johnson's Ten

Remember three weeks ago, when the Redskins were 6-2 and Ron Jaworski announced that his midseason MVP was Jason Campbell? Washington has dropped two straight, Campbell has looked pedestrian in both losses, and I'm guessing Jaws would prefer we never speak of this again.
Part of the problem is that the Skins' offensive line can't pass block. Or, more specifically, they can't pass block for more than 1.3 seconds. That, together with Campbell's sometimes suspect decision making and head coach Jim Zorn's inability to find a rhythm as a play-caller adds up to a lot of ugly offense. Clinton Portis, a legitimate MVP candidate, at less than 100 percent doesn't help, obviously, but we're at the point in the season when every team is missing at least one key player.
Six wins against four losses is the black-and-white proof that, as Bill Parcells likes to say, you are what your record says you are. But perspective is a funny thing; the Cowboys are also 6-4 and they couldn't be happier. Much of that has to do with putting Brad Johnson back in moth balls, getting Tony Romo on the field and finding some semblance of an offense.
After the Giants, who now lead the NFC East by three games, the division is wide open. (Well, except for the Eagles; they're done.) Which is to say that the Redskins and Cowboys are still in the wild-card conversation, although both teams will have to play mostly mistake-free football for the next six weeks.
By the way, does Wade Phillips strike anybody else as someone who should be sitting on a porch swing cracking pecans for his grand kids instead of pretend coaching a tackle football game? Just me? Okey doke, then...
Muffed Punts
Leftovers from Sunday's action...
... Jack Del Rio is definitely blaming the Jaguars' most recent loss on Mike Peterson. And I love the irony of the officials penalizing Titans wideout Brandon Jones for his "cuffed and stuffed" touchdown celebration. Fitting.... The Vikings Jared Allen was fined $50,000 for repeatedly trying to maim Matt Schaub a few weeks ago. Yesterday, Allen's teammate, Ray Edwards, leveled Bucs quarterback Jeff Garcia approximately two minutes after the play was over. Given the NFL's tough but arbitrary stance against such behavior, I fully expect Edwards to be executed in the town center ... or the league to do nothing. Definitely one or the other.
... Um, Rod, when somebody asks you if you've failed, I'm pretty sure it's rhetorical.
.... So much for Chad Javon Ocho Cinco's prediction that the Bengals would win eight games this season. But, hey, at least they didn't lose Sunday, either. Of course, the only thing more improbable than Mr. Ocho Cinco's visions of an 8-0 finish is that Donovan McNabb thought "tie games" were like unicorns and sea monkeys. Nope, Donovan, they actually exist.
... Clearly, the slogans worked for Mike Singletary and the 49ers. As for the Rams, consider this: they've been outscored 75-3 in the first halves combined of their last two games. As Herrera notes: "I don't think 'atrocious' accurately describes that."
.... The Raiders haven't scored an offensive touchdown in 13 quarters. It's a good thing Tom Cable's now calling the plays.
Post-Game Debaclings
Quotes that Emmitt Smith might like...
"Am I embarrassed? Definitely."
- linebacker Terrell Suggs, after Ravens defense allowed 207 rushing yards against the Giants
"You can't have an offense that doesn't score points."
- Raiders running back Justin Fargas after his offense didn't score a point for the 13th consecutive quarter
"Have we failed? Yes. Have I failed? Yes. Am I going to give up? No way. Am I discouraged? No way. I'm not."
- Lions head coach Rod Marinelli making his "have I failed" speech for the 11th week in a row.
"I didn't know that ... I've never been part of a tie. I never even knew it was in the rule book. I was looking forward to getting the opportunity to get out there and try to drive to win the game. But unfortunately with the rules, we settled with a tie."
- Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb, learning something new





















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
11-17-2008 @ 10:53AM
bob kolar said...
The unbelievable incompetence of the head official in the steelers-chargers game has to be dealt with.Any businessman who made a blunder that resulted in multi-millions of dollars being affected would immediately be fired.point spreads exist for one reason alone:betting.This official must be held accountable and these flag-happy officials should not have the power to totally change what happens on the field.
Reply
11-17-2008 @ 12:37PM
Sly said...
The NFL doesn't set the point spread nor do they endorse gambling. The players don't care whether they lose by 1 or 7.
11-17-2008 @ 8:21PM
Dan Burt said...
The NFL is unwatchable on TV cuz of the refs. Too many calls that don't purtain away from the ball that can be handled without holding up the game. These refs are power hungry men who feel they need to make calls to justify their jobs. Bull. It,s unwatchable. I'm giving up.
11-17-2008 @ 12:36PM
Tracy said...
I was at the Steelers game and the officiating was dispicable! Maybe the team and players say no comment but the fans can comment. IT WAS SICKENING TO WATCH! IT HONESTLY FELT AS THOUGH THE GAME WAS BEING FIXED BY THE REFS! IS VEGAS RUNNING FOOTBALL NOW!???? We had 13 calls on us and each call resulted in plays being redone, us losing touchdowns, us losing yardage after great runs or just blantantly losing a chance..the other team..had..are you kidding me? TWO? I would love for Dan Rooney to go over that game slow motion looking at all the refs did and see ..gee how many did they MISS on the chargers end..ALOT! The refs should have been kicked out for
intolerable behavior!!
Reply
11-17-2008 @ 12:36PM
Tom Daley said...
The Steelers-Chargers game had some of the absolute worst officiating ever. Ref Scott Green and his crew all ought to be relegated back to Pee-Wee football games. They don't even know the dang rules. The "illegal forward pass" / lateral / fumble / Pittsburgh TD / let's take that TD away just for the hell of it / then say oops we shouldn't have, is just one of three major errors made by this crew in this game. The first one was the "pass interference" call against the Steelers which put the Chargers inside the 5 allowing them to get their ONLY TD. No way was it interference when the defender was set in his position and was run over by the receiver, but more importantly the ball was well overthrown and UNCATCHABLE! The second one was the "fair catch interference" call which gave the Chargers an additional 15 yds to start a drive which led to their ONLY FG. The Steelers player was not even within 2 yds of the Chargers player when he caught the "fair catch", so how can it be interference? And, oh by the way, the Chargers player was then tackled because HE STARTED TO RUN WITH THE BALL!!! Of course the NFL, for political correctness reasons, won't do a thing about this blatantly poor officiating that's been going on all season, e.g. Denver handed a win amongst many other bad, bad calls. What the heck are the officials in the replay booth doing, playing Madden '09 or what? There has to be someone who can overrule the officials on an egreriously bad call involving a score that could affect the outcome or have playoff implications.
Reply
11-17-2008 @ 12:37PM
Frank S said...
Someone might shoot his sorry ass ..... Millions of dollars bet on this game $$$
Reply
11-17-2008 @ 1:09PM
John said...
It is so easy to sit here watching the game on TV or in the stands and think we see it all. The game today is going so fast that we all see and wonder about "blown calls". Try being a ref and amonst all those 300# bodies running around. Maybe a couple refs up in a box would help. But we sure would not like that. As far as the gamblers, tough s*@^. Like they say, ITS A GAMBLE
Reply
11-17-2008 @ 1:41PM
bob kolar said...
the refs admitted they blew it so what you wrote has nothing to do withanything , and as far as it's a gamble, when you win and they take it from you it's not a gamble, it's thievery.and a note to sly,you can't possibly be that naive.
11-17-2008 @ 1:40PM
JJack said...
The officiating for the Steelers/Chargers game was so obviously influenced by a desire to effect the outcome. The replay booths are full of gamblers, too. Vegas bought the officials who guaranteed that the Steelers wouldn't cover the spread. The "illegal forward pass" was just one of many glaring errors aimed at handcuffing the Steelers. How about that ridiculous early pass interference call in the end zone? I could see where the game was headed from the very beginning and I'm not a fan of either team. Just like to see the rules applied fairly to both sides. Vegas got too greedy and too bold last night. Hopefully, something good will result. Nah..........I didn't think so.
Reply
11-17-2008 @ 1:41PM
John said...
Bob, I apprciate your thoughts and views. I guess what I am trying to say is that its a GAME. So fast and no one is able to keep up with all of it. There are things that happen down field which could effect the outcome. But are never seen. As far as the gambling. Will we reach a point were the coach has to call the bookies before he makes a choice on a field goal or if he wants to just take a knee and get the game over. The refs. made a mistake. But in the light of all thats wrong in this nation, it is very small. By the way, I am a Browns fan but was for the Steelers last night. I knew a Bob Kolar back in Ohio, Might you be him?.
Reply
11-17-2008 @ 3:07PM
bob kolar said...
john, thanks for your mature reply, and because i was so impressed with it i will be taking the browns and the points tonight.so if i lose my money tonight i won't have to blame the refs.i can blame you.so have a nice day, i'm going to the track.(never been to ohio.)
11-17-2008 @ 1:46PM
BD said...
Referees are human but it seems the last two seasons have brought about a situation where too many calls are controversial and too many appear to favor one team over the other. I've seen the exact same action occur multiple times during a game and not called the same everytime. Although it would draw the games out, fair is fair and every questionable call should be scrutinized by the actual evidence which is instant replay. Even if you had to take one minute off each quarter to cover the time needed for reviews - there would be no more games decided by mistakes. More camera angles would also help. It has gotten out of hand.
Reply
11-17-2008 @ 3:07PM
Tom said...
The officiating is just not as good as it needs to be. Period. Millions of $$'s are paid to players and coaches, and the league uses part time officials to determine their fate?? Doesn;t make sense. I was at the Giants-Ravens game yesterday, and there were some very curious calls. Intentional grounding when the receiver was within 4 yards of the ball?? A conference to determine if Jacobs had scored a touchdown, when he clearly had gone at least 2 yards into the endzone?? A review of an "interception" which clearly hit the ground, (I could see if from my seats in the UPPER DECK!) Just a poor job. It won;t be long before a horrible call, or another misinterpretation fo the rules will cost a team a playoff spot, or worse, a playoff game. The league needs to do something, and do it quick.
Reply
11-17-2008 @ 4:30PM
Hubert said...
Hey folks Refs are human.... So far this season I think we can all see they bet or have family/friends who bet on football.
The first game SD lost? I think we all know that game was fixed.
I don't bet...don't really have a favorite team. So I just sit back and watch in amazment at the calls. Holding? What's the old saying? They could call offensive holding on 90% of the plays, but this would slow the game down. The same for college football.
For those who bet...Have fun.. you got the money to lose.
Reply
11-17-2008 @ 9:34PM
Ken said...
All refs are 'on the take' ...every pro sport...especially football & basketball (Only cuz baseball and hockey are tougher to fix).
I know I'm gonna be classified as another SD whinner but if you look at a couple of their games, you'll see the fix. Case 1: sd vs den @ denver +2, 2nd play chargers challenge a call and all of a sudden the review machine is busted, play stands. final score 39-38. Case 2 : same game, cutler fumbles, they call it an incomp pass. Case #3: More recent..Both myself, buddies, pitt fans counted 3x where the play clock was :00 and pitt made crucial conversions that led to pts. Case 4: the TD at the end , would've had pitt win by 7 (by rule they have to convt. xtra pt).
***
Im sick of pro sports, we spend soooo much of our hard earned $ for what? crooked refs, thugs, and greedy owners! I think about boycotting pro sports altogether in 09.
***
Reply
11-17-2008 @ 11:05PM
DAN said...
I heard that the bookies in Vegas made $63 million on the blown non-touchdown call. I'm thinking of starting a class action lawsuit on behalf of all those who legally betted on the game. The refs have already admitted that they blew the call. I'll file the suit against the refs and the NFL who employs them. Interested? Check out my website at havewesuedsomebodyyet.com.
Reply
11-18-2008 @ 12:21PM
bob kolar said...
as a guy who uses his computer to legally bet on games,(off shore), i appreciate your passion.
but it's a no-win situation.even tho it was a total rip-off and i lost more than a few bucks on it i won it back by taking the browns monday night
and the refs were very conservative.maybe they
learned something from this.anyway, like we say at the track when we lose a tough one,turn the page.
11-18-2008 @ 9:40AM
Eddie Haeffer said...
So can you tell me why they have the seventh tie breaker in the rules if it means nothing while they play during the regular season?
Reply
11-18-2008 @ 12:22PM
elaine whitley said...
I think the officials should be fined for their bad calls. They need to be held accountable just like the players are. I also think they should be dismissed when they consistently make bad calls.
Reply
11-18-2008 @ 12:22PM
ray said...
this has been going on for years, just not not as blatant, the refs. decide the outcome, in most games!
Reply