FanHouse's resident referee will chime in weekly with thoughts on major topics relating to officiating. We call it The Zebra Report.We've already discussed roughing calls a few times this year. The calls deemed questionable to the masses, though, continue to appear at an alarming rate. Every time I send the email to our NFL FanHouse group asking for calls they'd like analyzed, I'm bombarded with emails about roughing the passer or unnecessary roughness more than anything else.
We also know the law has been laid down all season by Commissioner Roger Goodell about safety -- to which Troy Polamalu had a few choice words. Coincidentally, the madness helped Troy's team this week. Well, sort of. In a poetic justice-type move, the Steelers ended up turning the ball over a few plays after the drive was extended via a 15 yard penalty on the Giants' Kenny Phillips.
Phillips laid Mewelde Moore out on the play, but he only appeared to take a step and a half or so before hitting Moore with his shoulder pads. The ball had gone in and out of Moore's hands. At full-speed, there's no way you can ask a defender to pull up from that close. He couldn't avoid contact unless he wasn't doing his job as a defensive player.
This was the most glaring example. The Big Lead covered several others where this strict enforcement has affected plays and possibly games -- for the record, I never think officials decide games ... that's a hyperbolic reaction housed by fans.
My problem isn't with my boys in stripes. They are obviously doing what they are told to do. It's their job, and Roger Goodell is their boss. Haven't you ever had to do something at work with which you disagreed? In my opinion -- as an outsider -- I'm placing 100 percent of the blame with the Commissioner here. He's got to ease up on this scrutiny when it comes to hard hits. There's a difference between the Kenny Phillips play and when Anquan Boldin's face was shattered. The officials are great at doing their jobs, so please just let them distinguish between the two.
Our own Stephanie Stradley has an intriguing argument here,
"I think that a lot of the get tough fine structure this year is not to protect the players but rather to have a bargaining chip with the players when they negotiate a collective bargaining arrangement. Oh, you don't like these extremely large arbitrary fines for dancing or for roughness that come out of your non-guaranteed contracts. Okay, we will work with you on that, but you have to give up___________."I hadn't even considered that, but it wouldn't surprise me. It's an intuitive theory. Either way, the roughing penalties need to be dealt with.
Some other issues to discuss this week ...
- Falcons may have been cost the game by a muff call. I'm a back judge in high school, and I can tell you with all certainty that my most difficult calls are when the punt is bouncing around and players are all milling about. No matter where you are positioned, the ball bounces somewhere you don't expect and nearly hits (or does hit) a player. This is where replay is supposed to help. Of course, the Falcons couldn't challenge because they were out of timeouts. A system like the NCAA has where they just booth review the questionable plays would have worked much better here.
I do want to point out how much I despise the language used in the first sentence of the link above.
The officiating crew took away any chance of a Falcons comeback in Sunday's 27-14 loss to Philadelphia.That's bulls**t. Plain and simple. In that very article is says the Eagles scored a touchdown two plays later. Did the officials block for the Eagles to clear a path? Did they suit up as Falcons players and miss tackles? What a farcical way of phrasing an intro. The players have to be accountable as well as the officials.
- Patriots were not penalized all game against the Rams at home. I didn't see the game, and I would never accuse those officials of being biased. They aren't. I do wonder how it's possible for an NFL team to play 60 minutes of football and not be assessed any penalty yardage. That just doesn't seem right, you know? As an official, you should never be caught keeping track or trying to "even up" the penalty count ... but zero on one team for an entire game? That's a clean football team, I guess. You know, the New England Patriots? They never try to get away with anything ...
- Eli Manning only penalized five yard delay of game for trying to call back-to-back timeouts, when Joe Gibbs was hit for 15 last year. I looked all over the place to try and find the rules concerning this, but didn't have any luck. I do, however, often preach about common sense. So we can figure this out together. What were the differences in situation? Well, in one game the team trying to call a second timeout was on defense and in the other that team was on offense.
So I'm going to estimate when the team is on offense you just don't grant the timeout and let the delay of game clock run out. On defense, a "time-out" signal could potentially cause an offensive player to stop ... messing with the rhythm of the offense, and thus, an advantage was gained by the defense. Thus, they put a rule in place to prevent such measures and it's deemed unsportsmanlike conduct.
Again, that's just my best guess. I could easily be wrong, but I think it makes sense.
UPDATE -- I was wrong. Here is our addendum.
- Chris Johnson fumbled last night and it was ruled that he was down. Once again, this is where replay should come in, but Tony Dungy didn't have enough time to decide ... I guess. They had timeouts and challenges available. That play in fast motion looked, to me, like the ball came out after he was on the ground. Once we saw it in slow-motion, however, we knew that it came out earlier. That's what replay is for.
That's all I've got for now ... I'll be back next week. As always, if you want a rule or play reviewed (even if it's a local 8th grade game), you may submit one to our mailbox.



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-28-2008 @ 3:09PM
Brent Trumpower said...
Regarding the 2nd timeout rule... Joe Gibbs called the second timeout to ice the kicker, which was granted by the official. It was then called an "unsportsmanlike" penalty for calling consecutive timeouts with the intent to ice the kicker, thus the 15 yard penalty. In Manning's case, they just do not grant the timeout, thus recieving a 5 yard penalty. I am a huge Redskins fan and was actually at that game against the Bills last year and my first thought was, "why did the official call a timeout if one wasn't allowed?" Just as the officials had done with Manning. Just another gray area in officiating that needs looked at in my opinion. In that situation, I blame the officials for granting a timeout that wasnt allowed, they could have just said (like they did to the Giants) you cant call another one! They would have been better off just pushing over an O-Lineman and taking a 5 yard penalty along with the extra time to "ice the kicker".
Reply
10-28-2008 @ 3:11PM
Brent Trumpower said...
but then again, Joe Gibbs should have known the rule and not gave the officials a chance to screw it up.
also just wanted to mention this...
PORTIS FOR MVP!!!
Reply
10-28-2008 @ 3:39PM
Royi said...
@"That's bulls**t. Plain and simple. In that very article is says the Eagles scored a touchdown two plays later. Did the officials block for the Eagles to clear a path"
Come on. Like the Falcons really had a chance either way with 2:33 on the clock, down by 6, and the officials giving Philly the ball in Falcons territory. The falcons should have had the ball on their 40 with over 2 minutes left to attempt a touchdown. Without any timeouts, they had no hope of stopping Philly. The game was stolen by the officiating (not their fault, aside from missing the first call, rules are rules).
Reply
10-28-2008 @ 4:32PM
Nathan said...
Did any officials signal that a Colt player had recovered the Chris Johnson fumble? If not would it have been given to the Colts (I mean, the ball fell under a large pile of mostly Colt players, but that doesn't mean that they actually got it?)
Also, I wonder if the increase emphasis on safety is a way of making the NFL look like the good guy and the NFLPA look like the bad guy when it comes to protecting the long term health effects of football on retired players. That way the players will have to flip the bill for all that medical coverage when the CBA is renegotiated. That's what I think at least.
Also, more importantly, Poooe-tis! Portis for MVP baby.
Reply
10-28-2008 @ 4:41PM
redskinsfan said...
Anybody dumb enough to think officials dont effect the outcome of games, hasnt been watching football. Dumb ass.
Reply
10-28-2008 @ 4:47PM
Thatsabsurd said...
Anyone dumb enough to think Goodell has the league in his best interests is stupppppppppppeeeeed. Goodell is in bed with the mob (Owners) and is destroying this league.
Idiot goodelll go- away!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
10-29-2008 @ 1:47AM
ostell griggs said...
he only pick on players. he did nothing to that new england coach and owner. he should never have been chosen to run the league. i believe he's in bed with the onwers also. pac man should be playing right now!!
Reply
10-29-2008 @ 7:46AM
G Hale said...
Your a back judge in high school? Your usually the wipe who decides the games. You run around all night doing nothing and you say to yourself hey I am being graded I better call something. You know exactly what I am talking about. High School back judges have made more calls in the 2nd half that have an outcome on a given game than anybody. Most officials don't do a good job because they have big brother watching and they are afraid to screw up. High School back judge...why would you say that outloud. Man your dumb.
Reply
10-29-2008 @ 8:36AM
JOHN said...
NFL, part time officials, this year are showing their stripes really mean they are Zebra's. So far this year with the blown calls they have proven beyone a shadow of a doubt that the game has gone far beyone their ability to make good decisions and good calls! Instant replay is a joke because it can't be used to prove on the spot that an officials made a bad call in the first place so it could be righted on the field and not in a worthless Email to the inept NFL office on Monday morning! The way the NFL is calling games this year both the players and officials should wear skirts and call it flag football!
Reply
10-29-2008 @ 10:27AM
Mike F said...
Why do people continue to say that the hit on Mewelde Moore couldn't be helped? Did no one else actually watch the replay besides me? The ball had ALREADY HIT THE GROUND and bounced back up almost four feet in the air before he got hit. Phillips could have at *least* pulled back rather than tucking his shoulder and driving through the player -- not to mention coming within mere millimeters of making a helmet-to-helmet hit. Come on, "Ref", you should be able to see that.
And while we're at it, why does Nate Washington get penalized AND fined a few weeks ago for for taunting after merely showing the opposing team the ball he just caught, but Brandon Jacobs doesn't get so much as a dirty look from the official standing right next to him FOR TAUNTING AN INJURED STEELER AS HE'S BEING HELPED OFF THE FIELD? (Ike Taylor)
Why not analyze things that actually happened rather than making excuses? I certainly don't think all the rules are fair, but if you're going to penalize one team for breaking a rule, you have to penalize every team when they do it. Plain and simple.
Reply
10-30-2008 @ 2:08AM
Dave Pierce said...
People will always hate on the NFL...its a fact of life.
Hey, Dave Pierce here, please contact me about doing a piece on my site http://www.SteelersTrade.com ~ it has been featured on KDKA and is a neat and unique Steelers website.
Reply