Occasionally FanHouse's resident referee will chime in with thoughts on major topics relating to officiating. We call it The Zebra Report.The most difficult calls for an official are judgment calls. Unfortunately in football that covers pretty much everything. Rarely is there a call as easy as an upper deck home run or a ball going into a hoop. This is simply the nature of officiating football. One call which carries a ton of discretion is roughing the passer, and it has been controversial for years. As Bruce Ciskie said this past week on an email chain,
"(I've seen) defensive players rushing with their arms up to try to block a pass, grazing the QB's helmet with a hand on the way by, and drawing a flag for it. I mean, it's one thing to tell these guys they can't hit the QB, but to tell them they can't try to knock a ball down because they might touch the QB's helmet is just ridiculous."I agree. Let's take a look at some plays from this past week.
Incident One: Panthers take back an interception, but it's called back by Ed Hochuli
The mainstream reporting on this was not surprising. Hochuli became everyone's scapegoat earlier this year, so the next time he makes "another controversial call," we have the big boys all spinning the story. The only problem was that it shouldn't have been controversial. Under the guidelines of the NFL, it is imperative these shots get called as roughing the passer. I can't say I like the overprotection of the QBs, but the league mandates it.
There's another layer I wanted to cover here. Sometimes the officials don't like the rule, but they are bound by the rules. In high school, sometimes we'll just tell a coach, "that's a bad rule, Coach. I'm sorry but my hands are tied." I doubt the NFL officials can do this, but you know damn well they think it from time to time. Hochuli himself has made a correct call before on a bad rule and suffered the undue criticism, so he's used to it.

Julius Peppers argues with Hochuli after being called for roughing the passer
Incident Two: Jags/Texans' game no-calls and roughing calls
This is more like three incidents rolled into one. Texans fans are understandably angry, because they got jobbed by an inconsistent level of discretion utilized by the referee. At three different points you have:
1. Matt Schaub gets leveled at the knees from behind after releasing a pass.
2. David Garrard gets taken down at the knees from the front after releasing a pass.
3. Matt Schaub get his ankles unnecessarily twisted several seconds after releasing a pass.
In my mind, none of these three should have been called. If anything, the last one could have been a personal
foul for unnecessary roughness because there is simply no reason to continue twisting someone's legs when he doesn't even have the ball. The referee Sunday, though, chose to only call the second one. To me, the first one is worse because it was from behind. At least Garrard could have seen the hit coming. On these incidents, though, the NFL really needs to make things clear to the officials on how to properly call things. If you really can't hit a quarterback below the waist at all once a pass is released, why wasn't Tom Brady's injury a roughing the passer call? I don't think it was, but I'm pointing out the inconsistencies ... and this game bore witness to both sides. Neither or both have to get called, as you can't just arbitrarily choose which to flag. (hat tip to Steph for the heads-up)
Incident Three: Pacman nearly beheaded
I can't find a video of this to post, but it's a blatant facemask of Adam "don't call me Pacman" Jones, which came with no call. There are seven officials, and -- as I said last week -- there should always be two sets of eyes on the ball. I have no idea how this should ever get missed. It's not acceptable.
Incident Four: Apparently missed FG counts
MDS covered this, and I can't believe it. There is an official under each upright. How can you possibly be looking straight up at the ball and count something when it's clearly wide? The only answer would be that someone isn't paying close enough attention to doing their job. This was the same crew that missed the above blatant facemask, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
Incident Five: Last week's offsidesSean Payton complained, and he appears to be right. Check out this still picture via PFT. The defender on the left side of the line is clearly across the ball. Last week in response to a commenter about this very play, I said that I hadn't seen the play, but,
"There are two officials lined up directly on the line of scrimmage (the head linesman and the line judge). I really, sincerely doubt that two NFL officials on the line would look the other way if a defensive player was a yard and a half past the ball offsides. Even the referee and umpire would notice that. I'm guessing the guy got off the ball really fast and it looked bad in fast motion on TV."After viewing this picture, I'm compelled to admit that I couldn't have been more wrong. Look at the hashmarks. The ball is spotted on the 36-yard line and the defender is clearly standing with his front foot on the line and his head past it. That's offsides every day of the week. Terrible error by the two side officials. I don't understand how that gets missed, especially by the line judge (he would be at the bottom here).
From the mailbag ... Incident Six: Hold, or no hold?
Do you have any thoughts on the penalty called on [Stephon] Heyer during the recent Redskins/Cardinals game? I'm a Redskins fan so I want to make sure I'm not biased in thinking it wasn't an earned penalty.Thank you for the submission, Mike. I have been unable to track down any video of this particular play, so I'll just go over some basic guidelines for holding calls.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Mike
- Point of attack matters. If it's a running play, the "point of attack" is where the ball is headed. If you are only mildly holding and the offensive player isn't even close to the point of attack, it's likely to be ignored.
- Jersey can get grabbed, but the hands must be inside the shoulders. If a hand or an arm finds its way to the outside of the shoulders, you are at risk for a holding call.
- If the defender is trying to separate when the ball passes you, he better be able to ... meaning if I am trying to back away from you and turn around, and can't, this is obvious holding. The offensive player must know when to release his man.
- Turning a defender with only arms will get a call almost every time. If you turn a defender a way he doesn't want to be turned, you better have stronger legs and be driving him that way. If his body gets turned as a result of hands-only, you're probably gonna get nailed.
That's all we've got for this week. Feel free to submit questions to the mailbox and I'll post them and answer as best I can. Like I said last week, I don't get to see all the games, so video helps.


















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-30-2008 @ 3:04PM
Nathan said...
Wow you are buying that missed FG bullshit? If the Cowbabies didn't think it went in why didn't they challenge it?
P.S. has anyone looked at this from more than one angle? An angle that doesn't give you zero depth perception? Thought not. Hey maybe T.O. actually caught all of those 18 passes and the refs just screwed it up saying the ball was on the ground.
Reply
10-01-2008 @ 8:24AM
highonhendrix said...
That kick clearly bounced off the inside edge of the upright. Even on the crappy NFL.com video that the link on this very page led to showed it plainly. Sounds to me like either wishful thinking or sour grapes on the part of some misguided adolescent Dallass fans.
9-30-2008 @ 3:24PM
Rebecca said...
I can't believe the missed FG stuff either. I was at the game, sitting behind the goal post in question. The kick went in, the ref made the right call. grow up
Reply
9-30-2008 @ 4:40PM
Panther Fan said...
If you think that was a roughing the passer on Julius Peppers, You are an idiot! He hit with his shoulder first just as the ball came out. Hochuli is getting senile. He needs to quit!
Reply
9-30-2008 @ 5:26PM
Matt Snyder said...
You are angry at Roger Goodell, not Hochuli or me. Direct shots to the head are pretty much off-limits when it comes to the QB ... just like the top picture of Ricky Manning "roughing" Joey Harrington last year ... or the situation Bruce is discussing in his block quote above.
Like I said, you might think it's a bad rule, but the officials are bound by the rules.
9-30-2008 @ 5:20PM
wedspyder said...
Looking at that video, I was able to pause it at a point where the football appears to be directly over the crossbar - i have no way of knowing whether the football was still short of the goalposts, but i think if a football goes over the goalpost, it counts as good, right?
Reply
9-30-2008 @ 5:39PM
Matt Snyder said...
I should have included this in the body:
"The kicked ball shall pass between the vertical uprights or the inside of the uprights extended and above the crossbar of the opponent's goal."
If what you saw is actually what happened, the field goal should have been ruled no good. I'm guessing -- judging from how quickly the officials were signaling -- the one under that upright gave up on it too quickly before the ball started to hook.
You see, the officials look at each other and say whether or not it's good, so they can signal simultaneously (we say "yes" or "no" in HS).
If I had to guess, I'd say the ball appeared to be headed inside the upright, and -- a little too early -- the official under said upright said "Good" or "yes" to the other one while the ball soared over the goal-post.
9-30-2008 @ 7:30PM
steve said...
stop hating on ed hochuli, everything he does this year and probably next year will be scrutinized to the nth degree. give the guy a break....but if he every screws up a call against the niners hang him
I just started a site and would love to get some feedback from you,
whenever you have time. It's a new pick'em site where you'll be able
to sell your picks and enter contests for a chance to win prizes all
for free. Also you can get the best nfl picks for free
http://cheehee.com/users/new
thanks
Reply
10-06-2008 @ 11:32AM
Mike H said...
I'm sure most people would like officals to just let em play football unless there is a blatant infraction. It's obvious from game to game, that some refs are always over officiating. You know when you see a certain officiating crew walking on the field what you are going to get. Good refs like Red Cashen are few, but most of them seem to try hard.
Reply