If you pay attention to history at all, you probably know how a blitzkreig works. The idea is that putting pressure on your opponent quicker than he can make decisions, you stay a step ahead and basically force him into paralysis of inaction because he can never make decisions quick enough.Eagles defensive coordinator Jim Johnson clearly knows what blitzkreig is. His Eagles defense stayed a step ahead of the Steelers offense all night. And in the process, he made every Steeler fan realize that the team's worst nightmare before the season began has just been in hibernation for two weeks.
After giving up nine sacks in a disastrous performance against the Eagles, the Steelers offensive line had no excuses, but this wasn't a case of players getting physically beaten as much as it was the Steelers being outsmarted by a defense. Philadelphia blitzed from every angle, but often Steelers offensive lineman were caught blocking air, as a linebacker or defensive back would take a step or two towards the line in a fake blitz before dropping into coverage. And while the Steelers offensive lineman was standing their confused, another blitzer would be running free into the backfield.
On their way to the Super Bowl in 2005, Steelers defensive coordinator Dick LeBeau found ways to take advantage of the Colts blocking scheme. Indianapolis asked its guards to pull outside to pick up blitzing linebackers, but only after first checking inside to make sure there wasn't an inside blitz. That scheme didn't work against the speed of Joey Porter, so LeBeau took advantage of it on the way to an upset victory.
The Steelers just had the same thing done to them. It wasn't something as simple as a poor decision to pull guards to block speed rushers on the outside, but Johnson was able to consistently figure out ways to bring blitzers completely unblocked.
| NUMBER OF RUSHERS | ||
| Rushers | No. of rushes | Sacks |
| 3 | 4 | 1 |
| 4 | 19 | 2 |
| 5 | 6 | 4 |
| 6 | 11 | 2 |
| 7 | 4 | 0 |
Clearly Johnson figured out some weaknesses in the Steelers' blocking scheme, or the decision-making ability of the Steelers' linemen, as the Steelers struggled to block everyone even when there were more blockers than pass rushers. Johnson used plenty of overload blitzes just like the Steelers do, but they had even more success with them than the Steelers have had.
The weakest link the Steelers' pass protection came up the middle. Justin Hartwig found a pair of linebackers lined up over him on a consistent basis in passing situations. He had to quickly figure out who to block, and he wasn't up to the task.
| SACKS ALLOWED | |
| Player | Sacks |
| Justin Hartwig | 3 |
| Willie Colon |
2 |
| Marvel Smith |
1.5 |
| Chris Kemoeatu |
1 |
| Heath Miller | 1 |
| Mewelde Moore |
.5 |
Some may think that the Steelers would have been better off with Byron Leftwich under center, as he moved the team in the final minutes, but he also was facing a somewhat different defense. And don't think of blaming Roethlisberger for not getting rid of the ball quickly enough--Roethlisberger either got rid of the ball or was dodging his first pass rusher less than three seconds after the snap on 31 of his 37 pass plays. Four of Roethlisberger's sacks came on plays where the first rusher was on him in less than two seconds.
As far as the difference defenses the two QBs faced, when Roethlisberger was dropping back, the Eagles rushed five or more on 18 of 37 plays (48.6 percent). Leftwich faced five or more rushers only three times in eight pass plays (37.5 percent). He was sacked once, did complete a 21-yard pass on one seven-man blitz and threw an incomplete pass when blitzed.
I'll have a lot more about the offensive line debacle over the upcoming week, but the Steelers' opponents just got the blueprint for beating the Steelers. The last time the Steelers offensive line was embarrassed like this was just a year ago against the Giants. But this thumping most resembled the midseason shutout loss to the Ravens in 2006. Like this one, the Ravens piled up nine sacks, and like this game, Pittsburgh had no answers for the defensive onslaught.



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-22-2008 @ 6:55AM
giant fan since 57 said...
Leftwich? Are you kidding? By the time he started his windmill throwing motion he'd have been lying on his backside.
Wow! great defense, Eagles. And....they won the game without Westbrook. The rest of the NFC East also won. If this keeps up the only games lost in our division may be the ones we play against ourselves!
Reply
9-22-2008 @ 8:17AM
Thatsabsurd said...
I don't thinks so. Eagles played great football. Hard hitting don't worry about finesse just slam the QB and slam him again. (especially if he is going to keep allowing us to)
Every other team in the NFL would have battled this by changing offensive tactics. Hit the receiver right over the line.
"SNAP" "PASS" 5-8 yards.
When the defense sends all their line men and linebackers/safety leaving the corner and watching the game take advantage of the middle with TE's and The SLot guy.
Ben was still trying to make plays. Take advantage of the weakness snap crackle pop. Hit those targets where the linebackers should be. That would have stopped Phily from rushing so many.
Two people lost this game
Ben Rothlisberger and Bruce Arians.
Reply
9-23-2008 @ 1:38PM
carol said...
what game did you watch !!!!! They were out played period.
9-22-2008 @ 9:10AM
JJ said...
Good job o-line.....after bragging all week how you were going to keep big Ben safe, you give up 9 sacks. You are the laughing stock of the NFL , and dont look now, but the schedule even gets tougher!
Reply
9-22-2008 @ 9:12AM
Phil. said...
Not since 1965 in Philly, boys.........not even in your lifetime!
Reply
9-22-2008 @ 10:30AM
marc said...
clearly, this was as much poor coaching as poor play. the lack of adjustments on the o-line, the inability to adjust play calling for quicker routes, the debacle at the end of the game. i'll give tomlin a small pass on this as it is only his second year as head coach. but, he does have veteran assistants on the staff and i'm not very impressed. how many times does your franchise player have to get drilled before you start throwing quick slants, screen passes, and swing passes to the running backs?
looking at this team, the talent level is average across the board if not better. therefore, 9 out of 10 times this team gets destroyed (which they were) you can chalk it up to poor coaching and game planning. i'd like to see tomlin come out and take responsibility for the loss. say they blew the game plan and failed to adjust during the game.
Reply
9-22-2008 @ 12:26PM
Randy said...
Marc...
Although I agree with you that adjustments should have been made but were not...I don't think that quick slants, swing passes, or screens would have been the answer. Other than quick slants, swing passes and screens take time to develop and also require an established running game and obviously, the Steelers had none of the above going for them. Quick slants may have worked, but again, slants are optimal when you have a running game. This keeps the linebackers in check so that their not jumping hot routes like slants, quick outs, or tight end dumps. Personally, I think the Steelers abadoned the run game completely. I think it was stubborness on the part of Bruce Arians who probably witnessed the Eagles - Cowboys game last week and thought the Steelers could do the same thing. Guess what, Bruce? The Steelers are not the Cowboys. Also, if you insist on having your QB in harms way all game long at least give him a chance...Roll him out away from the blitz and keep it simple. 5 wide sets and multiple routes just played right into Philly's hand. Simply put, they got out coached and beat up. This game was more than just a loss...this was an exposure. The Steelers had better correct their o-line issues now...otherwise, Steelers are in for a long season.
9-23-2008 @ 9:04AM
marc said...
randy,
i guess we'll have to respectfully disagree. i do agree that an establish running game will help the quick slants more. however, screens and swing passes are often used when the defense is overly aggressive with its blitzes. i also agree they need to get ben out of the pocket on designed rollouts more.
the main problem i see, is that the steelers offense is not flexible enough to make in-game adjustments. whether it's personnel or coaching is up for debate. i believe they have the personnel to run various types of offensive packages. but, in my opinion, the coaches have not prepared them for that.
it was obvious there was confusion in that offense and the only thing that mean to me is that they were not prepared. that is the coaches job.
however, you are right. the o-line needs to be better or this season will be over soon.
Reply
9-22-2008 @ 8:46PM
Thatsabsurd said...
Marc Randy well said and that's exactly why Pittsburgh will be a washed up team as the season progress. They really didn't do much to improve their coaching weakness from last year and teams with good coaches are going to exploit this.
But hey the writers on here don't know any better-- they'll keep blaming the offensive line.
Reply
9-23-2008 @ 6:56PM
bdc said...
Are you freaking kidding me. It was like playing against your little neices and nephews on Turkey Day. Phili KILLED us. I agree- we just could not adjust. You must find a way not to get your QB Killed it was an embarrasing display. I would hand the ball off three straight times and punt the Damn ball every time-I do not care- but they won't stand there and T-off on my franchise QB.
This is nothing new by the way- we can not run against good teams and get our ass handed to us by quality D's. It has been like that going on three years.
Check Down- every other team does it and NE wins Championships doing it-Check the hell down- we look like idots when we even try.
Reply
9-24-2008 @ 7:27AM
Thatsabsurd said...
A must read for the "Blame it all on the Offensive Line" prodigies.
Read "Steeler Fury" week 3 QB
Reply