
In the second quarter of today's game at Indianapolis, Jacksonville Jaguars cornerback Rashean Mathis stepped in front of Colts receiver Marvin Harrison, picked off a Peyton Manning pass and returned it 61 yards for a touchdown.
It was a huge play, the kind of play that can change the course of a game, but there was just one problem with it. Mathis blatantly interfered with Harrison, grabbing his jersey and pulling him back to get into position to intercept Manning's pass. The officials missed it on the field, but Colts coach Tony Dungy was yelling about it on the sideline, and on the TV replays it was obvious: It should have been a penalty.
And that raises an interesting question: Why isn't pass interference reviewable? Yes, I know the arguments against allowing pass interference to be reviewed on replay, but none of them really hold up to much scrutiny, not when you consider just how much a pass interference call (or, in this case, non-call) can change a game. If a TV replay can show indisputable visual evidence that pass interference occurred on a play, why shouldn't Dungy be allowed to throw his red challenge flag?
The answer is that he should. This is a rule that the NFL should change.





















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-21-2008 @ 6:15PM
Wade said...
It shouldn't be reviewable just because if it's reviewed, why not review for holds? A key hold by tackle to spring a runningback is just crucial as a lot of pass interference penalties.
Reply
9-21-2008 @ 7:14PM
V e e said...
Colts always cheating against the Jags... their so whiny when they play 'em... its pitiful.
Reply
9-21-2008 @ 9:40PM
ryan said...
you're retarded! how do the colts cheat?
10-02-2008 @ 9:40AM
Me said...
Seriously? I'll just take this to mean you don't follow the NFL. Jaguars are notorious for post-game complaining and pregame trashtalking when playing the Colts. Why you ask? Just look at their record against Indy.
9-21-2008 @ 7:28PM
Rocco said...
Aren't you the one who doesn't think there should be instant replay?
Reply
9-21-2008 @ 7:23PM
Eric Nentrup said...
Considering that ANOTHER questionable pass interference call on a 4th down is what led to the Jags' game-winning field goal, I'd say that the rule DOES need to be changed.
Reply
9-21-2008 @ 10:18PM
Unknown said...
The NFL officials are paid to call penalties as they see them and enforce the rules of the game. Sometimes a penalty is not called or a wrong penalty is called. This adds a dynamic of the game that has been around forever, some call it "luck." Taking the power of calling penaties or not calling penalties and being able to stand behind that decision away by making these kind of plays reviewable not only undermines the job and descretion of NFL officials but takes a major dynamic of the game away.
Reply
9-22-2008 @ 10:39AM
LongshotX said...
Let's make everything reviewable. Hell why not make the snap reviewable...give me a break.....
Reply