
Brandon Lang, whose life as a professional sports handicapper was depicted in the 2005 movie Two For The Money, offers picks that he says can turn a profit over the long-term for his clients. His full picks are available exclusively at his web site, www.BrandonLangExperts.com, and he's also offered us three picks for free here at FanHouse.
N.Y. Jets (-1.5) vs. Patriots
Don't know about you, but I'm convinced that if you sifted through the desk of Jets coach Eric Mangini, you'd find a contract with the devil. Think about it: Two months ago, he was the coach of a team coming off a 4-12 season facing the Tums-inducing dilemma of whether to choose the limp-noodle-armed Chad Pennington or the scrambled-brains Kellen Clemens as his starting quarterback.
Then Brett Favre fell smack onto Mangini's oversized lap, and as Favre was leading his Jets to a season-opening road win against Pennington and the Dolphins in Week 1, word comes down that Mangini's arch-enemy – Patriots coach Bill Belichick – lost his meal ticket, QB Tom Brady, to a season-ending knee injury just six days before Belichick was bringing the Patriots to the Meadowlands!
So to review: The Jets have gone from the Pennington/Clemens conundrum to one of the greatest quarterbacks in NFL history, while New England has gone from one of the greatest quarterbacks in NFL history to Matt Cassell, making his first start anywhere since high school. Uh, yeah, I feel quite confident in predicting that you're going to see a changing of the guard in the AFC East take place in this game, and I don't think it's going to be close (I mean, did you watch how the Patriots barely got by the pathetic Chiefs at home last week?). I gave you the Jets as a free pick in this space last week and I'm riding them again.
Vikings (+2) vs. Colts
What? You're taking Tavaris Jackson over Peyton Manning? That's like taking Jessica Lange over Jessica Alba! Have you been partying all week with Charlie Sheen, Amy Winehouse or both?
Hey, I can see how you would think that I was under the influence of a controlled substance or four, but I assure you this pick was made of sound mind and body. Look, this isn't about which team has the edge at quarterback; this is about which team has the advantage in the trenches, and that team, without question, is the Vikings. Minnesota has one of the best offensive and defensive lines in the game, certainly much better than the Bears, and we saw how Chicago beat the snot out of the Colts in Indianapolis on Sunday night. Heck, Bears rookie running back Matt Forte, in his first NFL game, ran over Indy for 123 yards.
Well, this week, the Colts' chore is to slow down Adrian Peterson; good luck with that. They'd have a better chance of slowing down Sarah Palin Fever! At the same time, Minnesota's ferocious defensive front four figures to, like Chicago, exploit the loss of Colts Pro Bowl center Jeff Saturday and set up camp in the Indianapolis backfield all day. I went against the Vikings on Monday night to cap a 4-0 week one sweep with premium plays, but I'm jumping on Minnesota's bandwagon for this one as Indy goes down.
Chargers (-1.5) at Broncos
This just in: The NFL has invalidated the Broncos' 41-14 victory over the Raiders on Monday night after determining that it didn't come against a real NFL team. My goodness, Al Davis must be rolling over in his grave. (Wait, what's that? He's not in a grave? Well, his team sure is trying to drive him into one!)
Anyway, in case you couldn't tell, I blame Oakland more than I credit Denver for the result of that game, which is why I'm not ready to anoint the Broncos as a playoff contender as so many media types out there are doing. At the same time, I'm not about to slap the overrated tag on the Chargers after their heartbreaking, final-play 26-24 home loss to the Panthers last week.
For one thing, I think the Panthers – whom I had last Sunday as a premium release on my website – are going to be a serious threat to win the NFC now that they have their starting quarterback healthy. If nothing else, I definitely believe Carolina is more talented and a lot deeper than Denver.
Finally, the Chargers have treated the Broncos like a punching bag the last two years, going 4-0 straight-up and against the spread, including holding Denver to two field goals in two meetings in 2007, winning those contests by a combined score of 64-6. You think the Broncos have closed the gap that much? Based on one win over the Raiders? Much like O.J.'s latest alibis, I ain't buying it. San Diego bounces back with a comfortable win.



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-12-2008 @ 4:01PM
alan said...
While I would be ecstatic with a Jets win over the Patriots, let us not confuse the Brady-less Pats with most other teams who have lost their franchise QB. This is still a veteran team that is coached by Bill Belichick who has almost always come up with an answer to whatever problems have arisen.
I am sure that Brett Favre is not going to be initimidated by any team and despite his age can still do the job but I would be willing to bet that Matt Cassell will be prepared to execute whatever game plan that the coaches think he is capable of handling!
Reply
9-13-2008 @ 9:51AM
joe digiammo said...
Brandon, you' re deluded;moreover, it's amazing how much vitriol you so called "experts" have for the Patriot's...face it, you guys can cry and whine and throw as much gas on the fire as you want about the Pat's...3 Super Bowls in 7 years...3! Belichik at this point is coaching for love of the game and legacy( and don't give me the cheating crap;NFL coaches have been cheating in various forms sincet he league's inception). Also, for those who want to point to his record without Brady...here's the bottom-line: 1.) he' the one who draftedBrady in the 7th round; and gave him the job over the man who at the time was the highest paid player in the NFL! 2.) he and Pioli were the ones at the forefront of establishing their middle class system of personnel Ie Bruschi,Harrison, Vrabel (back-up in Pitts.)...drafting Asante Samuel...3.) he's the one who took a rookie QB and borderline playoff team to the Super Bowl putting forth what was the quote "best game plan he ever laid out" shocking the {"greatest show on turf")....poor rest of the sports world;you salavating hyennas can't even wait long enough for Belichik and his infamous band of cheaters to loose a couple games!? Instead of hedging yourselves, you're spouting your onslought of verbal diarreaha, only setting yourselves uptobe pantsed,once again, by who probably the greatest coach of all-time. As far as this week Brandon, there's a couple other aspectsof the game you may be forgetting"1.) Brave Farvge knows 3 plays, and the last time he played the Pat's he looked like Tony Tubb's wobbling around the ring after taking a 1-2-3 from Mike Tyson 2.) there's 2 other aspects to the game :special teams and defense?? 3.) this is the J-E-T"s we're talking about!? Perhaps the most hapless team since the D-Ray's of the early 90's to 2007...inreal...this capicious act of hatred makes General Custer's line "we'vegotem'now boys...!" seem logical...Pat's 28-14...P.S. 7 titles this decade;come-on down or up! Fall's great;real estate is cheap; and, fianlly, our teams are #1! Suck on that America
9-12-2008 @ 5:42PM
Lucas Scheibe said...
Brandon Lang sucks with his picks. honestly if you want to win bet against what he picks.
Reply
9-15-2008 @ 1:11PM
sports fan said...
Joe, you have a real anger management problem. Don't give yourself a stroke. I look forward to your posts. BTW Where are you from?
Reply
9-15-2008 @ 6:59PM
NoLimitz80 said...
Just wanted to post a follow up. Told ya! All losers!
Reply
9-23-2008 @ 10:44PM
sniper said...
I've been betting for some time now and heard about brandonlang.com and paid money for a week's worth of picks and have found Brandon Lang's picks completely off-base and unreliable - to have North Carolina as your biggest play so far in the college football season seems utterly ridiculous! There were many other games that made so much more sense, examples: Miami, my top play, over A&M; Alabama vs. Arkansas. The reasoning behind your picks is what I’ve failed to understand. For instance saying NC is going to continue its high-powered offense when they've played nobody coming into that game and Va Tech having a long history of a great defense. Moving on to the NFL, taking New England we all now know was absolutely the wrong play because teams getting double digit points are 16-2 against the spread. So for that to be your 20 Dime Play NFL Game of the Week doesn’t make any sense.
There is plenty of money to be out there made like the over in the Bronco game as well as Oakland getting 9 1/2 at home, Philly minus the 3 against Pittsburg being 2-0 whereas Philly was 1-1 and had to have the game. And finally, Monday night the rational behind taking the Jets due to San Diego's weak defense was absurd because the Bronco's defense has been thrashing everybody's defense and furthermore San Diego had to have this game because they are 0-2 and want to prove a point. I am 14-2 on the year maybe you should be paying me for my picks! One more thing, my pick of the year so far was Denver over Oakland and for you to take the other side makes me really wonder how you are still in business. If you really want to be on the right side against the spread for FREE, I’ll post my picks each week.
Reply