
Training camps are underway, the NFL season is a month off, and to get you ready for 2008, FanHouse previews all 32 teams, "heat index" style. We'll rate each club in 10 categories on a scale of 1 to 10, high score wins
Quarterback: Daunte Culpepper. Josh McCown. Andrew Walter. Aaron Brooks. Kerry Collins. Marques Tuiasosopo. Rick Mirer. Tee Martin. Rob Johnson. What do these guys all have in common? They've all lined up at quarterback and thrown passes for the Oakland Raiders since the start of the 2004 season. Such a list is probably what prompted the Raiders to use the No. 1 overall pick of the 2007 draft on quarterback Jamarcus Russell. After a four-year revolving door of horrifying and nauseating quarterback play (seriously... Rick Mirer?), the Raiders are in desperate need of some stability at the position, and they're hoping the talented Russell is the guy to bring it. He struggled in his brief action in '07, but that's to be expected of a rookie playing for a not-so-good team. Unfortunately, it should be more of the same in 2008. Russell could be very good in time, but it's probably not going to happen this year. Heat Index: 5
Heat Index Rankings
With the summer heat on everyone's mind, we decided to gauge each team's temperature. The higher the number, the hotter your team should be in 2008.
With the summer heat on everyone's mind, we decided to gauge each team's temperature. The higher the number, the hotter your team should be in 2008.
- Indianapolis Colts -- 79
- Dallas Cowboys -- 78
- New England Patriots -- 76
- Green Bay Packers -- 70
- Jacksonville Jaguars -- 70
- New Orleans Saints -- 70
- New York Giants -- 69
- New York Jets -- 68
- Detroit Lions -- 64
- Buffalo Bills -- 63
- Houston Texans -- 63
- Minnesota Vikings -- 62
- Baltimore Ravens -- 60
- Carolina Panthers -- 56
- Denver Broncos -- 56
- Arizona Cardinals -- 53
- Chicago Bears -- 52
- Cincinnati Bengals -- 52
- Oakland Raiders -- 51
- Miami Dolphins -- 45
- Atlanta Falcons -- 44
- Kansas City Chiefs -- 41
Running Back: The bright spot of the offense, and it's probably not even close. Justin Fargas is coming off a strong 2007 season where he rushed for over 1,000 yards, and No. 4 overall pick Darren McFadden should offer excitement and hope that better days might soon be ahead. Oakland is going to need these guys to run until the wheels fall off, and McFadden turning into Adrian Peterson V. 2.0 would certainly help the cause, though it's going to be tough for him to make such a splash running behind a questionable line, and facing what will likely be eight-man fronts every week. Heat Index: 7
Wide Receiver: Now that Drew Carter is out for the year, the Raiders head into the season with only three receivers on the roster to have caught a pass in a real NFL game: Javon Walker, Ronald Curry and Johnnie Lee Higgins... and Higgins has only caught six. Normally, when a player like Carter goes down for the year after having caught only 31 passes the previous year, it might draw an "aw shucks, that's a shame," type of reaction from the team... but in Oakland, I can picture this touching off panic in the front office simply because they are paper thin at the position. They could always sign a Joe Horn who is desperate for a team, but we would advise against such a move, opting instead to go with the young guys. It might be painful in the short-term, but could prove beneficial in the long run. One of two thing happens: (1) Somebody develops into a long-term solution at the position or (2) you find out for certain all of these guys are terrible, and can address the position in the off-season with a real long-term answer, as opposed to a 35-year old, one-year stop gap that won't make a difference in the standings anyway. Heat Index: 4
Offensive Line: After the Raiders' third preseason game, Head Coach Lane Kiffin wasn't thrilled with the play of his offensive line, saying, "It kind of reminded me of who we are." 2004 first-round pick Robert Gallery is on his, I think, third different position along the line, and starting left tackle Kwame Harris was a washout across the bay in San Francisco. With a second-year quarterback that's going to experience his share of growing pains, along with a rookie running back and an inexperienced group of receivers, a bad offensive line is the last thing you want. Heat Index: 4
Defensive Line: The Raiders were miserable against the run last year, giving up nearly five yards per carry (worst in the NFL). They re-signed defensive tackle Tommy Kelley to a gigantic contract and took a flier on former first-round pick William Joseph, who missed all of the 2007 season. Derrick Burgess has been a quality pass-rusher since putting on the silver-and-black three years ago, but has seen his sack totals drop the previous two years, from 16 in '05, to 11 in '06, to 8 in '07. Kalimba Edwards was brought in from Detroit, presumably to help Burgess in getting some pressure on opposing signal callers. Heat Index: 5
Linebackers: Strong group with some impressive young talent, led by Kirk Morrison and Thomas Howard. Morrison has registered at least 115 tackles in each of his three seasons, while he and Howard teamed up to intercept 10 passes and defend 21 in '07. No linebacker intercepted more passes than Howard (6), while only Keith Bulluck registered more than Morrison (4). Brought in former safety Adam Archuletta for a tryout at linebacker, much to the chagrin of Matt Snyder. Heat Index: 7
Secondary: The Raiders have invested a ton in their secondary over the years with mixed results. Going back to the 2002 draft, the Raiders have used six day one picks (rounds one through three) on defensive backs, and this off-season sent a second-round pick to Atlanta for Deangelo Hall. Not a big fan of Hall. He gets hyped up a lot as a "shutdown corner" but my lasting image of Hall will always be that game during the 2006 season where Hines Ward outran him in a straight sprint to the end zone, while Ward was wearing one shoe. Spent much of training camp arguing with the Raiders on whether or not his hand was broken. Nnamdi Asomugha is still the best corner on the team. Heat Index: 6
Special Teams: The Raiders used their 2000 first-round pick on kicker Sebastian Janikowski (we're all still laughing about that) and he's never been anything more than a mediocre kicker. His accuracy in the field goal game is roughly 76% for his career, and barely 70% over the previous three years. The Raiders had the second-best NET punting average in the NFL last year. Heat Index: 5
Coaching: I suppose at this point I should say something about the coaching staff, but I'm not exactly sure who the coach is. Don't get me wrong, I know in theory it's Lane Kiffin. He's listed in the media guide as Head Coach. He gets to stand on the sidelines and wear the officially licensed NFL merchandise. He's the one that stands in front of the press after each game and answers questions about why the team lost. He gets to wear that nifty headset. But is this really his team? It sure doesn't seem that way. On Sunday he talked about how he had "no idea" who was on the teams radar to replace Drew Carter, and he's openly criticized
Intangibles: The Raiders went to the Super Bowl in 2002 and haven't won more than five games in a season since. On the plus side, outside of San Diego the AFC West isn't exactly a powerhouse division now that the Chiefs are down and Denver is coming off a 7-9 season. Heat Index: 5
Total Heat Index: 51 It's a mixed bag in Oakland. There's hope for the future on offense with Russell and McFadden, and there's a lot of talent on defense with the linebackers and secondary. The coaching situation is cloudy at best, while the organization as a whole seems as dysfunctional as ever. There will be a lot bumps and bruises, with some flashes of brilliance and perhaps, if everything breaks absolutely perfect... seven wins on the season.



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-27-2008 @ 2:39PM
Dave said...
Tee Martin? WoW! I knew he played for the Steelers and all but who would have guessed the Raiders too! WOW! Thats a small shocker (then again look at that list since Rich Gannon left)!!!
-Dave
http://www.eSellOut.com
NFL Tickets at a price anyone can afford.
Reply
8-27-2008 @ 4:30PM
Rebel2124 said...
It would be nice to see Davis allowed his coahing staff to pick out some of the groceries since they're doing all the cooking. Oh and hey, not fire them when he doesn't like how the meal tastes.
Reply
8-27-2008 @ 9:50PM
Robert said...
I suspect that Kiffin is actually a pretty good coach, but will we ever know? Once again, Al will refuse to let his head coach implement changes--the system must always be Al's. And, once again, Al will hold his head coach/scapegoat employee responsible for the result.
Reply
8-28-2008 @ 9:20AM
Albert said...
As soon as Al Davis dies we will be O.K.
Reply
9-07-2008 @ 6:45PM
Kevin said...
Thats exactly what its going to take Albert. "Unfortunately" the team will be dead until that happens.....
8-28-2008 @ 3:17AM
reikilight said...
The Raiders will compete this year and if Russell can be a better than average QB they will be in the playoffs this year. Their running game will score while controlling the clock and the defense is improved over last year in almost every phase and they were in almost every game last year. Your ratings will suck eggs Gretz. San Deigo will lose twice to Oakland! Your ratings are week and deserves a 2 on the heat index Adam.
Reply
8-30-2008 @ 9:37AM
GREGG said...
HEY RAIDER FANS......
I THINK THE NFL CAN SCHEDULE A PERSEASON GAME AT THE L.A. COLISEUM IN 2009 ( OAK-vs-SD )
WHAT DO YOU THINK FANS ??
COME ON NFL "JUST DO IT "
Reply
8-30-2008 @ 11:43AM
raiderrobert said...
Gregg dont you know a preseason game in your own division will never happen??
L A is desperate for NFL football and does deserve a team there but you can blame the NFL and the other owners for that.
VIVA RAIDERS!!!!!!
Reply
9-04-2008 @ 1:21PM
Lane's Dog said...
Adam,
You display your ignorance as much as your arrogance. Bet you didn't see even one Raider pre-season game. This stupid article is based on old hackneyed stories off ESPN and the east coast sportwriters line where they copy everything someone else said without knowing anything. Just like you did.
Reply
9-04-2008 @ 1:33PM
Adam Gretz said...
I don't think it's ignorant to assume a team with a second-year quarterback with almost no NFL experience, a bad offensive line and non-existent receiver corp is going to struggle to score points and win games. Or were your referring to the remarks about Al Davis being out of touch with reality?
Reply
9-04-2008 @ 2:05PM
jeremy said...
The secondary is highly under-rated in this article as Hall will provide the perfect complement to one of the best CB’s in the game, Nnamdi Asomugha. Gibril Wilson’s signing allows Huff to move back to his natural FS position to utilize his speed to make plays. ESPN and many other media outlets have now placed the Oakland secondary as top 3.
As for Sea Bass, if you take away his FG’s missed which are longer than 50 yards or longer than what a standard K kicks in any season, his numbers are drastically higher. Lechler is one of the top punters in the game w/o a doubt.
The running game will again be top 10 (they were top 6 last year), but you are definitely right about the passing game. It needs work and doesn’t deserve a high ranking until it proves otherwise.
If you are going to write something about any team, make sure you know what you are talking about and don’t just use stats to back your reasoning. Anyone can use stats to make something look better/worse than it actually is.
Reply
9-04-2008 @ 2:37PM
Adam Gretz said...
in my opinion (key emphasis on the words "my opinion") Deangelo Hall isn't a perfect complement to anybody. He's just not that good (in my opinion). Sorry, I'm just not that high on Deangelo Hall and Gibril Wilson.
As for Janikowski... when you take a kicker with the No. 17 overall pick in the draft he better be able to consistently make kicks from all over the field and from any range, otherwise, it's not worth it. So, I refuse to give him a pass for missing 50-yarders. The NFL is loaded with kickers that can consistently hit 40-yard field goals and miss from beyond 50. They grow on trees.
I said nothing negative about the Raiders' running game, and I agree, it's going to be good, but it's going to face a stiff test every single week because teams know the Raiders are going to have to run, and run a lot.
Obviously, I've riled up the Raiders nation. There's some promising young talent with Russel, McFadden, Howard, Morrison, Asomugha... but there's just too many holes at important positions (offensive line, wide receiver) and question marks (how quickly does Russel develop with little help out wide and in front of him? ).
Reply
9-06-2008 @ 4:33AM
Kevin said...
The running game is was sixth best in the league last year. That means either the backs were six best or the blocking of the O-line was sixth best. Either way the RB's got much better.
The Recievers got better as well. I would take Walker over Porter. Curry is solid. Lelie is better than Mike Williams and Tim Dwight.
Also, how could you be down on Gibril Wilson? He has the most tackles of any Saftey in the last five years. He is a great tackler, were Stu was just horrible which resulted in many of the yards the D gave up. The D-line will be much better also.
Ward has made many CB;'s look bad over his career. He is one of the best WR's in the league, or has been at least. I gotta admit that Hall is a gambler, but also a two time pro-bowler. He is at least a solid CB.
In your opinion, I guess Champ is way over rated since he got lit up by Jerry Porter for 3 TD's at home in one game. Everybody has an off day. Clearly you had one the day you wrote this article.
However, I totally agree with you about the passing aspect of the O-line. The tackles are completly horrible.
Also, I will go out on a limb and say that you dislike the Raiders....
Reply
9-05-2008 @ 9:55AM
Adam Gretz said...
I don't dislike the Raiders, I dislike the way they're run. I just think (again, my opinion) they spent a lot of money this off-season on guys that just aren't very good, or, guys that won't live up to their contracts (Walker, Javon).
For your sake, I hope I'm wrong.
Reply
9-08-2008 @ 2:26AM
Kevin said...
I hear you Adam. i'm not trying to argue with you, just clear up a few things.
However, who cares how much money was spent, unless your the one paying their contracts. The contracts are back end loaded and voidable after a couple years anyways. The question is did the new players upgrade the positions.
The answer is yes.
This is a better team than the team that had the lead in most games in the fourth quarter last year.
I would say 6 - 11 wins is the correct prediction, especially taking into account the schedule strength, or lack there of.
Reply