
Lately, journalists have criticized bloggers for being overly emotional and non-factual (Bill Conlin) and for "wrecklessness" (Steven A. Smith's spelling, not mine). Ultimately, I believe that neither bloggers or journalists have a monopoly on truth and responsibility. We are all just humans, with our own biases and blindspots and emotions and often deadlines, and that you judge the quality of writing not based on what someone's profession is, but rather on the content of what they are saying.
On a recent PTI, Tony Kornheiser and Mike Wilbon asked the question who deserves a bigger apology: Chargers head coach Norv Turner or Texans defensive end Mario Williams? And they came down on the side of Williams, noting that people called him a bust before he even had put on an NFL jersey:
Ultimately, I don't know what type of career Mario Williams will ultimately have. But what I do know is that our society is subject to group think and hype. And that the mainstream media as a whole did Mario Williams and the fans a disservice when they didn't even provide even basic information about him when he was drafted.
Certainly more people probably heard the criticism of the 2006 draft pick because he wasn't Reggie Bush or Vince Young, than will ever hear media types apologizing for calling him an instant bust.
Personally, I find that some of the most irresponsible reporting of the 2006 draft came from the Houston Chronicle. Most national media sources rely on local media to get a feel for local teams. Houston is a one newspaper town, and that newspaper's staff was very angry that neither Vince Young or Reggie Bush were chosen by the Texans.

It's fine for a columnist to dislike a draft pick. Columnists form opinions, that's what they do. What is irresponsible is for an entire newspaper not to provide even basic information about that pick so that fans can learn about a player they aren't familiar with and decide for themselves.
The Chronicle didn't provide any history of Williams' college career, or talk with the players and coaches from his team and I am pretty certain that none of the columnists watched him play an entire game. Basically, all they discussed his physical size and freakish athletic ability, so most fans were left with the impression that he was just a combine wonder, even though he had a great college career coming out as a true junior and was likely going to be picked #2 by the Saints.
If you want to know more about how incomplete and unfair the Chronicle reporting was on this issue, and would like to read the types of information that fans might have wanted to know about Mario Williams at the time, I suggest checking out this blog post I wrote after the draft entitled "The ultimate Mario Williams compendium." (My byline is no longer on the piece, but I wrote it. The pompous title was meant as a minor joke).
In November 2007, after Gary Kubiak kept praising Mario Williams performances, Chronicle columnist Richard Justice suggested that Williams "is doing a great impersonation of a sixth rounder." This absurd opinion is no surprise given that after Williams' third game in the NFL, Justice invited his blog readers to come up with derogatory nicknames for the rookie.
Richard Justice finally sorta-kinda-not really apologized this week--in a blog post and in two small paragraphs at the end of a column. Justice even admitted that he was wrong in stating that Williams couldn' t play in an email exchange with the blogger from the Texans-focused DGDB&D site who writes particularly nasty things about Justice (link vulgarity warning).
Jerome Solomon of the Houston Chronicle recently discussed this roller coaster view of Mario Williams and Texans by "the media" (though the description of the Mario Williams talk as "he's a bust-he's a Pro Bowler" really fits the other Chronicle columnists more than the media in general).
The local media wasn't alone in providing an incomplete picture of Williams as he came into the league and wanting to call him an immediate bust. ESPN had a cover story on Williams right after the draft that spent more time updating readers of what notorious draft busts of history were doing than it did talking about Williams' background.

As this is a sports blog, it is worth stating that Mario Williams, now that he is healthy this season and understanding the game better, is having a really good 2007. It's clear that he is still learning, but with 9 1/2 sacks so far and being solid against the run, you can see how teams are game planning for him.
But as to the bigger issue of trying to find reality through the hype, I don't want to bash Richard Justice or the media in general. If you write enough words, you are likely going to write a few you wish you could take back.
I just think that the 2006 draft is a cautionary tale about how excessive hype can lead to people seeing what they want to see, ignoring what doesn't fit their thesis, and overhyping or dogpiling people depending on what the popular point of view is at that particular moment based on limited information.
We as readers and viewers of news, sports or otherwise, from any source have to use our own judgment to figure out if we are getting the complete story, or just something silly to generate page views. (Or to tell tales on myself, this silly link).
I like reading my newspapers and watching my ESPN SportsCenter and listening to my sports talk radio, so consider my minor media review of the 2006 draft as not just criticism for the sake of criticism. I think it can serve as an object lesson and plea for the mainstream media and for bloggers to keep looking for truth among all the hype, and for all of us to be critical viewers, readers and listeners.


















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
12-12-2007 @ 10:47PM
The Hazean said...
Fantastic story. As glad as I was that my Saints were able to get Reggie Bush, Mario Williams clearly was a great choice by the Texans.
Reply
12-12-2007 @ 10:47PM
1Texan said...
You're too nice, but that was a great article.
As others have said, we need reporters writing for the Chronicle who are Texan fans first, and then let the others there write for the teams that they are filling our local paper with stories of. It's pathetic the Chronicle tolerates that trash on a daily basis. No wonder there are so many fans for other teams here, since our reporters cultivate that with constant reinforcement. But great job on your part!
Reply
12-12-2007 @ 10:48PM
Moonshine Mike said...
I think a lot of this discussion/anti-hype for Williams is that most journalists - like the average fan - likes offensive and flash. QBs, RBs, and WRs are flashy. These folks put fans in the stands, but they don't always add up the W's.
Remember when Orlando Pace was selected first by the Cardinals, and everyone thought Vermeil was crazy ("a Left Tackle! who cares?!"). Now, it's becoming more well known that the left side of the line is crucial for developing an offense. I'm thinking that the Defensive End is one of those positions which can be a lock down pick.
Reply
12-13-2007 @ 7:56AM
tyler said...
well said Steph.
Thinking back to my emotions at the time, I was furious at the pick. I wanted Reggie. Why? I think I,like most Texan fans, wanted a savior. We needed hope coming off of 2-14 season. Many fans, myself included, were convinced that Reggie (or Vince) could save our beloved, yet infant franchise. I think the Chronicle staff recognized that, and they took advantage of it. I'm sure they sold quite a few newspapers. What they should have done is give a fair and accurate assesment of the pick. If for no other reason than out of respect for Mr. McNair, who is just about the best Owner a city could hope for. After the initial shock, I calmed down (it took about two weeks!) and did my own research on Mario. I decided he was our guy and that I was going to support him and give him a fair chance. I can only imagine how much pressure he was under last year given all of the circumstances. Has Mario ever complained that he didn't get any respect? No. He's handled everything, the criticism and the success, with nothing but class. Like with anything in life, if you are successful then you silence your critics. One good year doesn't make Mario an All Pro, but he's heading in the right direction. Perhaps Mario will make his first Pro Bowl appearance this year? Here's hoping it's the first of many.
Reply
12-13-2007 @ 7:56AM
zack.marker said...
When the Saints were 0-4 (or so) someone here at the Fanhouse made an allusion to Reggie Bush being one of the biggest busts in the last 20 years. Of course the whole Saints team was struggling, Deuce, Brees, Colston - nobody was having the same type of season as last year.
I think it's too early to judge anybody from that draft class, Mario, Vince, Reggie - and the rest. However, it does look like Mario could end up with a stellar career.
Reply
12-13-2007 @ 7:56AM
zack.marker said...
Wow, that was a horrible comment, the two paragraphs weren't connected at all.
My point was basically that, when the Saints started turning it around, so did Bush. He's definitely had his ups and downs, from his first year to this, and from game to game. We just don't have a big enough sample to work with.
Is Vince Young still a winner who gets it done regardless of stats now that the Titans are struggling, or is he still a young player that has a lot to learn about playing in the NFL?
The media loves to make blanket statements and bold pronouncements, because they're not accountable for anything. They can just say something else the next day, kind of like our president. That's why we have the Daily Show (pre-strike) and blogs - to call out the bullshitters.
Reply
12-13-2007 @ 7:57AM
Steve said...
Reggie Bush and Vince Young WILL prove to be busts in terms of top draft picks. Mario Williams is on his way to becoming a ferocious Defensive Tackle and a highly sought free agent when he gets fed up in the land of losers - Houston. Stay strong Mario (and look North my friend, Green Bay can use another pass rusher to compliment Kampman and replace KGB in the future..
Reply
12-13-2007 @ 12:47PM
Tripledoublepg07 said...
The 2006 draft class was one of the best of all time. with names like Matt Leinart, Reggie Bush and VY, no one talked about Mario Williams despite the fact that he would still likely go #2. So far, the big three above has still received most of the hype, despite the fact that they have yet to produce consistently and be the kind of player that you can build a franchise on. Mario Williams, however has produced. Remember, Williams is an athletic freak, and will be a Pro Bowler for many seasons
Reply
12-13-2007 @ 12:47PM
Craig said...
Having attended most home college games Mario Williams played for at NC State, I knew exactly how clueless mainstream media has been as far as Mario's true capabilities. He was dominant and more than just athletically gifted. He sacked, tackled for losses, blocked field goals and punts, intercepted passes, and changed games.
I was surpised at exactly how definitive (and ignorant) evaulations of Mario were - like Bill Simmons, who said it was the worst draft pick ever, worse than Sam Bowie over Micheal Jordan. Well Bill, enjoy eating your crow. Sportswriters have short term memories and will surely forget exactly how harsh they were on Mario, and how well he has handled it.
For anyone who is curious, Lawrence Taylor had 0 sacks his first year out of college. Would they call him a bust if he this has been his first year?
Reply
12-13-2007 @ 1:35PM
Gary said...
One aspect of Mario Williams' development that shouldn't be overlooked is the coaching changes made from his rookie season to this season. From various reports by the Texans, Houston Chronicle, etc. new (to the Texans) coaches Frank Bush and Jethro Franklin should be given some credit in the success Mario has had this year. It appears that Kubiak will hold his coaching staff more accountable than Dom Capers - who was perhaps too loyal to his staff - and will make changes if they're not getting the results he expects.
Reply
12-13-2007 @ 2:59PM
Coudab06 said...
Whats the point of giving history on his college career when the guy that played the other defensive end spot had better numbers coming into the draft, im not saying mario is trash but he wasnt a number one overall pick thats for sure...
Reply
12-13-2007 @ 4:11PM
Craig said...
The point, Coudab06, is that he's not just "athletically gifted" or a "project", like many sportwriters wrote him off as. He is also very talented. As far you being "sure" he wasn't the number one pick, did you got to sportswriting school with that definitive assessment? Who would you have picked, Vince "I never met an interception I didn't like" Young? Reggie "Please don't hit me, it hurts" Bush? Heck, if anybody is playing better from that draft that Mario is right now, it would have to be Cromartie for San Diego, and he was the 19th pick!
Bottom line is Houston took a gutsy pick, and right now it's paying off. Vince and Reggie aren't.
Reply
12-14-2007 @ 12:28AM
dana sansom said...
I wasn't surprised that the Texans didn't take Bush or Young. But I was surprised that they didn't take and offensive lineman. Keep up the good work Kubiak!
Reply
12-14-2007 @ 12:28AM
Don said...
You should replace Richard Justice at the Chronicle. His behavior last year was an embarrassment on all levels - lack of research, lack of professionalism, lack of class.
I do think the Texans should have traded down if they wanted to bolster their line, but it's good to see Williams doing so well.
Reply
12-14-2007 @ 12:29AM
Nick said...
Here's what your *extremely fair and balanced blog entry* failed to mention: The Texans passed on Williams because they wanted an easy signing. They negotiated with Bush for days, and when he wouldn't agree to terms before the draft, they picked Williams. Hindsight is 20/20. Of course you can dump on the Chronicle guys now, but the paper's — and the fans' — anger was justifiable at the time. The franchise was in desperate need of a playmaker, coming of a year where it had the worst record in the league and took the cheap way out.
It's pretty pathetic that you're pissed at the the big bad "MSM" for irresponsible reporting when you completely skirt what actually happened.
1Texan, this is exactly why fans shouldn't report on the team. You get junk like this.
Reply
12-14-2007 @ 12:29AM
chron said...
An excellent post. I am following the Texans from the East Coast because I spent 15 years in Colorado and was a Broncos fan -- Kubiak was a class backup and a good assistant, and I like watching him help a team grow from the ground up. Sadly, the paper that should make long-distance fandom possible has a sports staff that thinks independent thinking means trashing the local team. I don't want them to be homers -- I just want the facts. I want reporting. I want to know what's going on. I don't want to watch that high school intern's (She's a high school intern, isn't she? Gotta be!) hapless video interviews and I certainly don't want to watch her and her dad (He's her dad, right? Come on, he must be!) doing silly Punch-and-Judy skits. Justice is actually one of the bright points on the Chron staff. It's ridiculous that I get better information from a blogger than from a well-financed team of professionals -- but, hey, Steph, thanks! I'm glad you're here!
Reply
12-14-2007 @ 12:29AM
Craig said...
I'm sorry..... I got caught up in watching Mario get 3.5 sacks tonight. You were saying?
Reply
12-14-2007 @ 10:21AM
Dave said...
Right on the nose! Fantastic article and Mario put an exclamation point on this article with 3.5 more sacks against the Broncos.
I'm a new fan of yours!
Reply
12-14-2007 @ 8:25AM
Fran said...
Steph,
What an appropriate column right before the big game for Mario. He now has 13 sacks, and the stadium chanting Mar-i-o! What a fantastic player!
Since he had to put up with so much last year, it is so great to see the turn around! (even Justice saying he was wrong).
Thanks for all the real info. on Mario Williams!
Reply
12-14-2007 @ 9:37AM
Xetuoh said...
Steph,
I hold you in the highest regard! When you began writing your blog for the "comical" and then here, I found more info (less the hype) then I was receiving from the national "hacks" and especially, our own local media(ocre) "paid" journalist. It was/is getting to learn about my team based on fact and not the constant bashing by these "overhyped/overpaid" pundit's, whose paid responsibility is to report those same "fact" and not their biases. (Except you being a fan)
Native Houstonian, living in the land of the Phillistine, here in Nashville (home of the demi-God, VY), any and all "news" is welcomed! I wish those who blast blogger's and you, should take a look at their body of work before taking shot's for a their "media" pedigree!
Mario owes you a dinner for the unbias "truth" you blogged about him, since being picked no.#1 overall in that infamous draft. You gave details of this young man and delivered it as the info you found, what others had written, film, and Pro football/college scouts and coaches were saying about this incredible football player, not your opinion.
Great job and keep us fans, that appreciate info without the agenda, up-to-date on our Texans!
Those who lay down with dogs (media hacks), get up with fleas...
Reply