Here's the recap from the Texans website, the Bucs website and the AP version. You can see the game highlights here.Yesterday, I was fortunate to sit behind the Texans bench, and I thought I might be able to give you a few game day observations and photos you won't find anywhere else (from mostly a Texans' perspective given my vantage point).
Quarterbacks
The game was a battle of the backup quarterbacks with Sage Rosenfels for the Texans and Luke McCown for the Bucs getting the starts due to injuries to the starters.
It is no surprise to Texans fans that Sage Rosenfels can move the ball, even against some good defenses. His aggressiveness sometimes gets him in trouble, but the Bucs weren't able to capitalize enough on the sacks and fumbles. This picture below shows the medical staff attending to Rosenfels chin after one of the sacks.

Rosenfels is well-liked and trusted by his teammates and is a smart, articulate guy who can read defenses. (Here's something I wrote about Rosenfels last year, though my byline isn't on it any more). He probably would have ended up the starter last year except that he got a fluke injury to his hand during a special teams' play last year.
What's been interesting about the Texans story this year is how well they have distributed the ball to different receivers. As teams account for Texans receiver Andre Johnson and his spectacular skills, it gives more opportunity for the more possession-style receivers/tight ends for receptions. Last year, the previous quarterback who shall not be named would get in trouble trying to force it to Andre Johnson even when defenses were playing exotic defenses to limit his touches.
McCown came off a great performance against the Saints, but made too many mistakes against the Texans. The Bucs were having success running the ball around the sides of the Texans defense (especially away from defensive end Mario Williams' side of the field), and probably should have run the ball more on the edges to take pressure off of McCown.
The Texans blitzed more this game than in recent games, and McCown often had problems recognizing what the defense was doing.The Texans tend to play better at home than on the road, and the Bucs have had their own road problems, and this, combined with a young quarterback and four turnovers, contributed to the final outcome.
Special Teams
This has probably been the best combination of an offensive, defensive and special teams performance of the year. Andre Davis had a spectacular tight rope return for a touchdown after the half that really pushed the momentum in the Texans favor.After his touchdown, Davis sat down on the bench, and coaches and players from both sides of the ball gave him their congratulations.
Defense
Though I have been very critical of the vanilla play calling by defensive coordinator Richard Smith, I think this was the best called game he has had since being with the Texans and the best defensive performance.. With a young quarterback, his game plan stopped most of the running in the middle of the field, forced turnovers and mixed up the pressure.
Texans defensive end Mario Williams had yet another solid game, apply fairly steady quarterback pressure that made McCown throw the ball out of bounds, and finished off the final TB drive with a sack and a quarterback pressure. Williams has had 6.5 sacks over his last six games. He has played over 95% of the defensive snaps this year which is an absurdly high number for a defensive end, and it is clear that opposing offenses are game planning for him.
Injuries
Coming into this game, the Texans led the league in players on IR with 17. The 2007 Bucs team isn't that far behind with their losses of key players.

The Texans offensive line and running back position became especially thin during the game. At various points, guards Kasey Studdard and Chester Pitts had to leave the game, and tackle Ephraim Salaam had to get re-taped. Studdard got clocked and couldn't return, and for a while right tackle Eric Winston had to slide over to guard to let backup Rashad Butler play tackle.
This picture shows the training staff working with Kasey Studdard, getting him to open and close his hands and talking to him.
In his post game quotes, Gary Kubiak acknowledged the difficulty they were having at the line:
We had no more players. (G Kasey) Studdard was out. Lights out. He's got a neck, head...he was lights out. We were out of players when (G) Chester (Pitts) left. As a matter of fact I told the official, "Would you do me a favor? If something happens to another one of these linemen would you all go to a commercial because we're just going to take some time." He just started laughing, but I was serious. We had nobody else. We suited seven. Chester jumped off the ground, came back, and played. That's the type of effort our team gave.Ron Dayne started the game, but started having ankle issues. You could see him on the sidelines trying to work it out, and he received a shot at the half. Darius Walker got his first game action and showed some flashes of good play, though the Texans really didn't try to run the ball much until the end.
Ultimately, the story for both of these teams in 2007 is how much they have been sidelined by injuries but are still playing with a lot of heart and effort. Injuries to starting quarterbacks and running backs and many other players can often lead to catastrophically bad season, but both of these teams are trying to hold it together MacGuyver style.
I'd like to hear other people's observations of the game, especially from the Buc's perspective from the hospitable folks at the Buc's fansite TheCaptain's Deck.



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-10-2007 @ 2:33PM
Moonshine Mike said...
My question would be is where do you think Texas is in their rebuilding project? Are they still 1-2 away from making solid strides? Injuries are not excuses, but they do mean their second and third string are not as good as their first, and they should deal with that in the off season. If you look at perennial winners such as NE, Indy, Pitt they have pretty solid second and third string players who can step up.
Personally, I think Tampa has more questions on offense than Houston does, and that's not something that has been said about Houston a lot.
Reply
12-10-2007 @ 2:52PM
Stephanie Stradley said...
For players and coaches, injuries can't be an excuse, but certainly it is an explanation for a lot of things. The NFL is a league of playmakers, and certainly teams without Tom Brady or Tony Romo or Peyton Manning wouldn't be the same teams. Having 17 guys on IR is absurd.
In addition, it is easier to add young role players on a team that already has a nucleus of experienced talent. That if you are young at a particular key position, then you want experienced guys at other positions. The Texans at play making positions are very young.
If you would have told me that the Texans would be missing Matt Schaub, Andre Johnson, Ahman Green, Jerome Mathis, Dunta Robinson for large parts of the season and would have the record they have so far, I would have been pretty impressed with that. The Texans were without Andre Johnson for three games in 2005 and he was hobbling for more, and barely won 2 games that year.
The Texans are young in a lot of parts of the team, and have really been playing under the same system for two years, with almost a completely remade roster.
I like the plan for the rebuilding of the Texans. Put a system offense together and then get as many playmakers as you can, as quickly as you can on defense.
I would say that the number one priority for the Texans is to fix their running game. I think they know that as well, and the Ahman Green/Ron Dayne tandem was an attempt to have experience at that position when you are breaking in relatively inexperienced quarterbacks.
The most positive thing that the Texans having going for them is the passing game, and if you look around the league, the teams that have the best chances at the playoffs are those teams with solid play at the quarterback position.
They still have to upgrade at many positions, and hope that some of their solid players that they currently have don't get injured.
If someone looking at this team doesn't see progress, then they aren't watching carefully. Even so, they have some tough games to finish the year.
Reply
12-10-2007 @ 5:40PM
Mark In Cypress said...
Finally we got to see Walker...and he did not fumble and all of his carries were for positive yardage. He also showed he is an excellent pass receiver. He is not LT but it was encouraging to see him get that much work and respond favorably.
Mike Brisiel played very well. No false starts, no holding calls and seemed to just fit in. Salaam got eaten up again. Man, I hope Spencer can make it back. And what is the deal with all the false starts by Winston?
For all his limited playing time, I am very impressed with Rosenfels. His only mistakes were the two fumbles. Really appears to make good reads on offense.
Kubiak and staff coached to win rather than trying not to lose. Believe it or not it makes a huge difference.
Reply
12-16-2007 @ 1:50PM
Sam J from CLC said...
1. My question would be is where do you think Texas is in their rebuilding project? Are they still 1-2 away from making solid strides? Injuries are not excuses, but they do mean their second and third string are not as good as their first, and they should deal with that in the off season. If you look at perennial winners such as NE, Indy, Pitt they have pretty solid second and third string players who can step up.
Personally, I think Tampa has more questions on offense than Houston does, and that's not something that has been said about Houston a lot.
-------------------------------
My response is similar to Steph's. I think the Texans are turning the corner. Kubiak wants to be a Denver-style running team but most of his superior talent is in the passing game. I know why he wants to run though. We don't have a solid enough O-line to let Schaub/Rosenfels stand back and pick teams apart. We have to establish the run to slow down the other guys' pass rush.
If I were Rick Smith, next season I'd go all out to improve the pass protection. Think of it, AJ, Davis, Jacoby Jones (or a healthy Jerome Mathis), plus Kevin Walter or Owen Daniels... no way teams could put more than 7 guys "in the box" against us. And if we could add a Brian Westbrook-type guy (could that be a healthy Chris Taylor or Ahman Green?) to the mix our offense could be something to behold.
Our first string guys - except for the DBs and the aforementioned O-line - are solid to outstanding. And at some positions we don't drop off in performance when the 2nd string guys come in. We just need to fill some holes and increase the quality of the depth. We're getting there.
Now if we could only swap conferences... maybe swap places with the Falcons in the NFC South.
;o)
Reply
12-11-2007 @ 9:04AM
chron said...
I'd be surprised if Kubiak's next draft included a stud runningback. Given where he's coming from, I assume he'll be working on the theory that a good offensive line will spring even a mediocre runner. There's no rule that says everyone starting now will start next year ... I'm sure he wouldn't mind bringing in some surprises. But -- and the peanut gallery isn't gonna like this -- for a team at this stage of building, the likely choice in the next draft is "best athlete available" with an emphasis on linemen.
Reply
12-11-2007 @ 9:10AM
Stephanie Stradley said...
Sam J-
Good points. Though I don't think a Brian Westbrook guy is the sort of runner that Kubiak covets--he likes the pass catching, but he wants someone to be a bigtime downhill runner.
With Sherman gone, and Green spending this year injured, I am guessing Green won't be a Texan next year--though Kubiak has not said that.
chron-
Spot on. They will definitely take bpa. That being said, I think they would take running back high if they found the right guy. Portis was an example of that with Denver.
Thanks all for your comments,
Steph
Reply