
Somewhere in American culture, there's a reigning notion that the fourth date is the proper time for two romantically interested parties get to know each other intimately. Of course, there's a wide spectrum for the timing of Biblical knowledge -- from the wedding night to a cursory greeting and an exchange of money -- but an accepted norm (from what I hear) is the fourth date.
So, too, is it in the NFL.
I'm not saying anyone outside of Minnesota is actually having sex with entire NFL teams -- but those first three games of the NFL season play out in the same manner as the early stages of dating. Prepare yourselves for some metaphors that I've mixed like a dirty martini at the Rainbow Room.
Erste date. Oh, you may have gotten some scouting reports from friends. You've got film from last season. But which team will show up? Is the defense sturdier than you expected? Who knew they had a breakout season planned for that particular asset? Second date. What you expect was what you saw in the first week, but -- more often than not -- you see a completely different performance. Sometimes it clicks; sometimes it can be a little awkward. Sometimes the offense is already out of tricks and it just sputters along for hours.
Third date. Finally, you start seeing some trends. You can't quite predict performance, but you're not too surprised by anything, either. Just don't be distracted by what they're wearing -- those are throwbacks, and they have nothing to do with performance. Don't be mad at them; they were just trying to impress you.
Week 4
Here we are. The fourth date, where we finally get to know our teams intimately. What do we stand to learn? Let's take a look at the games, grouped by what you might do if your successful fourth date spills over into Sunday. (Note: some games omitted to alienate readers.)
Early Games (brunch, large sunglasses, mussed hair)
Packers (3-0) at Vikings (1-2) -- We may very well learn that Tarvaris Jackson has no future in the NFL, regardless of what Joe Theismann thinks. More importantly, a 4-0 Packers team would be officially stamped "for real" -- however much that counts in the NFC North.
Jets (1-2) at Bills (0-3) -- A New York state stinker of a double date. Unless the Jets falter, we're about to learn that Lee Evans is disappointing, Paul Posluszny is injured, and J.P. Losman is disappointing and injured. Marshawn Lynch may be the only source of hope for this team.
Texans (2-1) at Falcons (0-3); Raiders (1-2) at Dolphins (0-3) -- Does any 0-3 team stand a chance this week? Smart money says that Miami is the best bet at home against Oakland -- despite another week without Andre Johnson, the Texans' defensive line should be enough to keep Joey Harrington off-balance to get the win. A lot of fans are going to begin pulling away emotionally.
Bears (1-2) at Lions (2-1) -- Better study some film for this one (warning: animal violence)...
The Bears somehow managed to work their way into a tie for last place in the NFC North after just three weeks. Were those just tough losses, or are Detroit and Green Bay the better teams? We're about to find out if new starter Brian Griese is better for Chicago than deposed Sex Cannon Rex Grossman.
Late Games (lingering goodbye)
Bucs (2-1) at Panthers (2-1) -- A pair of unpredictable Southern belles. Oh, they've been mostly sweet to start the year. But watch out -- they've got a temper, and can melt down at any time. Winner of this game establishes division control in the absence of the vacationing Saints.
Seahawks (2-1) at 49ers (2-1) -- Finally, we shall learn which American city full of cross-bred hippie-yuppies has the superior football team. (Last year the Seahawks were the better team but went 0-2 against San Francisco behind Herculean efforts from Frank Gore. Field Gulls, a Seahawks blog, is prepared for more of the same.)
Chiefs (1-2) at Chargers (1-2) -- Herm Edwards and Norv Turner: worst coaches in the NFL, or worstest coaches? Yeesh. These guys left a trail of wreckage, but somehow you thought you might be able to "fix" them. Wrong.
Steelers (3-0) at Cardinals (1-2) -- This game has "break-up sex" written all over it. I'm not quite sure what I mean by that, but the Steelers seem to be doing very well without Ken Whisenhunt and Russ Grimm, thankyouverymuch.
Sunday Night ("I had fun" text message)
Eagles (1-2) at Giants (1-2) -- A couple of pretty girls without scintillating personalities. Will we see the the disappointing Eagles from Weeks 1 and 2, or the electric Eagles from Week 3? The state of the Giants defense suggests the latter.
Monday Night (resist temptation to call)
Patriots (3-0) at Bengals (1-2) -- If the Rudi Johnson-less Bengals can somehow upset the Pats, it will be the equivalent of a fourth date that ends like The Crying Game.

1. TV Distribution Maps: CBS gets the doubleheader this week: early games; late games. FOX's solo games are here. Why most of Ohio and western New York are getting Seattle-San Francisco, I have no idea.
2. NFL Style Watch: The unanimous opinion on the Eagles' throwback uniforms seems to be that they're horrendous. This may be true in a strictly in a visual sense, but I suspect many Philly fans may look upon them fondly.My favorite team wears a monochromatic blue uniform with neon green piping that is universally discounted as, at best, an eyesore. But the Seahawks never accomplished much wearing silver and white. Since their change to the mystery shade of blue, they've managed a Super Bowl appearance and a string of NFC West titles. I like those awful uniforms, just because the team wins in them.
I'm sure plenty of fans would be okay with their team wearing flesh-colored uniforms with bright pink helmets, as long as they won 56-21 every week.
3. Oh, hey! Look, everybody -- Tony Parker and Eva Longoria must be back from their honeymoon.
4. Angry Commenter of the Week: Last week "Eileen" didn't like my statements about Donovan McNabb's controversial comments. She wrote, in part, "Hey Matt, do your homework ... that interview with Donovan was taped in August. Irresponsible blogging strikes again."
A valid point, Eileen. However, I think the larger point I was trying to make was that we should all strive for racial harmony. I'm sorry if that offended you.
5. Derek Anderson Watch: Speaking of commenters, this is a reminder that Tom Dickerson thought I owed an apology to the Browns' slow-footed mastodon Derek Anderson after his breakout performance against the Bengals. Last week Anderson completed 18-of-37 passes for 248 yards, 1 TD, and 2 INTs in a loss to the Raiders.
Where's MY apology, Tom? Huh? I can't heeeeeeeearrrrr youuuuuuuuu.
6. For those of you who are put off by my unnecessary needling of the people who cared enough to take the time and provide me with feedback, I recommend the automatic complain-letter generator.
7. This week marked the beginning of Oktoberfest. While I lament that I have no Irish heritage to excuse my consumption of brown liquor, I can at least blame my hearty beer intake to the 25% of my blood that comes from Deutschland. As such, I thought it only fitting to honor the dirndl, the traditional Bavarian dress that is so much more tasteful than its lederhosen brother.
Sorry, No Photos
8. The Anti-Michael Vick? Yes, it's possible to love animals too much.
9. If you have time to kill, the Top Ten Old School NFL Commercials is worth a trip down memory lane. That Jim McMahon was such a rebel! With his sunglasses and his Honda scooter.
10. I Love My Own Work: In the first Prelude, I wrote about the inverse relationship of hope and knowledge as the season progresses. It's Week 4, and we see knowledge of our teams beginning to replace hope. In some cases (Patriots), the knowledge is that a team is dominant, and hope becomes a vestigial feeling. When the knowledge is of a team's haplessness (see: Bills), hope gets placed on hold until the offseason.
Hope makes for a better story; hope warms the heart while knowledge cools the head. Keep hope alive -- root for the underdog this week.



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-28-2007 @ 12:31PM
dpettey33 said...
CC - if you pick apart the Fanhouse comment-braintrust, you could be here all day. And the worst part about it is: you can't win. ALL-CAPS rule everything. Everyone knows that.
Reply
9-28-2007 @ 2:07PM
Jordi said...
I've never been on a fouth date myself. Must be what people do when they are not sittin' there in mom's basement in their underwear. But I must say that comparison was very White Dade-esque.
Reply
9-28-2007 @ 3:22PM
Bluefoot said...
I can't see who won the cage match. What the f**k?
Reply
9-28-2007 @ 3:55PM
hardawayhatesyou said...
Prediction no one cares about: Griese will play well and the Bears will still lose because the defense is so banged up they're thinking of bringing back Donnell Woolford.
Reply
9-28-2007 @ 4:18PM
Smokey Cloud said...
Hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies. - Ellis Boyd "Red" Redding.
Reply
9-28-2007 @ 4:24PM
August West said...
"(Note: some games omitted to alienate readers.)"
Matt, that's the most honest statement in the history of sports writting. Thanks for you service abroad and candor here at home!
Reply
9-28-2007 @ 5:33PM
Tim said...
I wish my date, the Browns, would stop violating me.
Reply
9-29-2007 @ 2:39AM
Moonshine Mike said...
Matt always takes care of business before the 4th date, from what the story is.
Reply
9-29-2007 @ 10:21AM
debbiedoes said...
Truely loved your colum this week!! I am a Philadelphia fan and if Donovan came out in a pink tu-tu and army boots and played like last week...need I say more? LOL
Reply
9-30-2007 @ 9:30AM
KP said...
Griese will play great because he is a MICHIGAN boy but I hope Detroit wins! Were sick of losing (Fire Millen)
Reply
9-30-2007 @ 10:42AM
KP said...
Griese will play great because he is a MICHIGAN boy but I hope Detroit wins! Were sick of losing (Fire Millen)
Reply
9-30-2007 @ 11:21AM
Eileen said...
Response from the angry commenter of the week:
"I think the larger point I was trying to make was that we should all strive for racial harmony. I'm sorry if that offended you." - Matt
Striving for racial harmony wouldn't offend me in the least, Matt. But I fail to see how this statement (the one to which I originally responded)is striving for racial harmony....
"And it seems that the discussion of race only surfaces when a team starts losing."
Not only is it unfair in suggesting that Donovan was using race as an excuse for poor performance, I would say that it feeds the small minds that would like to believe that and thus perpetuates racial DISharmony.
Reply
9-30-2007 @ 11:21AM
Kenzo/Newport said...
Are you kidding me!? Who cares who wins when you can read a writer as entertaining as Matt. It's all good...
Reply
9-30-2007 @ 1:19PM
lazeedogg said...
who cares if stewart sweared on t.v ?
Reply
9-30-2007 @ 1:23PM
Matt Ufford said...
Actually, Eileen, I'd ask that you read the sentence BEFORE the one you keep harping on:
"What's lost in all this bombastic back-and-forth isn't just the truth, but a more important point: that every week, black and white (and Hispanic and Asian) players put on the same uniform to work together to win football games."
Note the words "MORE IMPORTANT POINT." And learn to take a joke, why doncha.
Reply
10-01-2007 @ 12:30AM
Eileen said...
With all due respect, that previous sentence doesn't change nor justify the fact that you wrote the subsequent one. Ya know, the one I keep "harping on".
And "learn to take a joke, why doncha." doesn't exactly address my point.
Reply
10-01-2007 @ 12:37AM
Devang said...
Matt,
See what happens when you sign p to write for the fanhouse? Just remember that while Real Sports tackles and raises some very serious issues, Bryant Gumbel is know to stir the racial pot himself. Remember when he derisively dismissed the Winter Olympics due to their lack of African American participants? I guess that was OK.
I'm not sure that this has been mentioned before, but McNabb was also referring to a column by a gentleman from the Philadelphia NAACP who said that McNabb isn't being "black enough".
How about when Charles Barkley uses uses terms like "white boy", no one calls him out on it? Please don't tell me he's an entertainer and doesn't mean anything by it. It's a tired old excuse. Look what happened to Imus.
Overt or subtle racism goes both both ways.
And I'm neither white nor African American, so I have no vested agenda in arguing for either side. My issue is that we tend to hear one side of the argument and run with it.
Reply