I'm the last one to be an apologist for lawbreaking NFL players, but I've been wondering lately if the NFL's new personal conduct policy actually INCREASES the amount of attention given to NFL player badness. The policy allows the commissioner a great deal of latitude to decide punishments for players: "Conduct that undermines or puts at risk the integrity and reputation of the NFL will be subject to discipline, even if not criminal in nature."Nobody knows what the penalties for different offenses will be, even apparently NFL commissioner Roger Goodell. Reportedly, Goodell was prepared to give Pacman Jones a six month suspension but increased it to an entire year when he heard that Jones had visited a strip club in New York the night before he was set to meet the commish. So basically, Jones' offenses were worth six months, except when they are worth a year long suspension because Jones was an idiot and went to what turned out to be the most expensive strip club ever.
Before the new NFL personal conduct policy, usually if players got sideways with the law, discipline was tabled until after the legal process finished with it. And the problem most people had with that is that usually legal stuff goes pretty slowly, and this meant that a player that did something pretty bad could still be wearing a uniform with nothing happening to him. The news coverage and commissioner actions relating to those events was usually tabled a bit too.
But have you noticed that since the policy, every bad thing an NFL player does seems to have little extra scrutiny whether or not they are arrested? If a player does something bad, fans and opposing fans wonder if, when and how much Goodell will bring down the hammer. The new policy has been called the "Pacman Jones Rule," but I'm sure most of the discipline cases that Goodell sees aren't going to be anything like Jones' situation.
Not only is there extra scrutiny, but if just a player arrest can lead to discipline against that player, local prosecutors and police are going to feel extra pressure to not to arrest somebody or at least to make sure they are pretty certain of the charges. Is the NFL's policy deterring player arrests? The Mike Vick dogfighting situation is the obvious example of that, but that might just be the beginning.
For example, reports suggest that Texans offensive lineman, Fred Weary is currently under investigation for assaulting his wife at a swingers bar. In talking to a Houston based criminal defense attorney, I was told that it is very unusual for HPD to come to a fight scene not arrest someone immediately and then let the court system sort it out. Either the case against Weary is very very weak, or that Weary was receiving special treatment when he wasn't arrested right away.
Ultimately, at least in the short term, it seems as though the NFL personal conduct policy designed to get players to stop damaging the NFL's reputation may actually be bringing more attention to player's misdeeds. What say you?
(Photo credit: Getty Images)














Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-04-2007 @ 6:33PM
Mike said...
I don't believe that Law Enforcement agencies will give special treatment to NFL stars because they may face League penalties. I do believe, however, that professional atheletes are supposed to be roll models for our youth and they should live an unsullied life. They are given millions of dollars to play a game or sport that entertains the public and that is supported by the same public financially. The least they can do is not commit crimes and expect special treatment.
Reply
6-04-2007 @ 6:33PM
Robert said...
I completely agree. It seems this new policy is intensifying the negative attention the comissioner wanted to avoid.
Reply
6-04-2007 @ 6:35PM
Ilanin said...
They might, Mike. Under Goodell's new one-strike-and-you're-out regime, a player might well end up being wrongfully arrested and suspended as a result. He's then likely to turn around and sue, and he's probably got a good case for damages against the officer and PD that arrested him. I'm sure this will have occurred to various law enforcement officials who really don't want to waste time and money defending themselves against such suits, so the word might go out to make sure you're really sure before arresting a pro footballer.
Reply
6-06-2007 @ 9:30PM
rinaanne said...
You've got something wrong. The policy does not increase attention to the bad players - the media does a great job of that all by themselves. It's like the bad news make bold headlines and the good news is in small print. Quit trying to be the story-breaker on the bad news and maybe the attention to the bad players would be less.
You did get something right, though. The commish needs to pan out some better guidelines. What kind of infractions results in what kind of suspensions. The number of infractions should equal to X number of suspended games, etc. Of course, if it is that specific then sometimes people don't get all that they deserve, but at least players, coaches, and fans would have an idea of what they are facing and the media wouldn't need to update us every other day on the progress of the suspension, thus....it will result in less attention to the bad guys.
Reply