
The FanHouse's Adam Rank thinks Michael Turner could be the Chargers' MVP in 2007, but I don't know if that will be enough to keep him in San Diego. While the rumor spigot has slowed to a dribble recently, the San Diego Union-Tribune's Jim Trotter puts forth an interesting idea: Trade Turner, takes the picks acquired in the trade -- likely a first- and third-rounder -- and use them to move up in the draft to select Calvin Johnson or LaRon Landry.
Trotter does all the NFL Value Chart math, but the only way the Chargers get Johnson is if they move up to No. 2. Granted, wide receiver is a BIG need for San Diego, but with a relatively deep draft class, I'm not sure even Johnson is worth the cost of moving up 28 spots (Philip Rivers might disagree).
Landry, on the other hand, is much more attainable. San Diego could move up to No. 8 by trading their two first-round picks, and Landry should still be available. Again, though, there are two or three safeties who could be had for something less than what it would take to nab Landry. Yeah, both Landry and Johnson are miles better than their contemporaries, but ultimately, it comes down to general manager A.J. Smith thinking either player is worth the cost. And, of course, he'll need to find a team willing to meet the Chargers' trade demands for Turner.


















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-18-2007 @ 11:20AM
AmbientDonkey said...
There is no way the Chargers will get a 1 and a 3 for Turner. I know that is what he is tendered at, but no team will sign him if they have to give up that much.
Reply
4-18-2007 @ 11:36AM
Ben McKnight said...
Why on earth would anyone give up a 1st and a 3rd in a trade? They could have him for that now by signing him to an offer sheet.
Keep dreaming.
Reply
4-18-2007 @ 12:03PM
Carl said...
This will happen about when Jessica Alba has my love child
Reply
4-18-2007 @ 8:51PM
Ed1sd said...
I think can make a couple of move that could and might include turner, me personally would like to keep as combo with LT think of haveing them both in the back feild it could really confuse the d-fence they are both good at what they do, plus LT is allready going at his prime he is just going to slow down so we need so prolong LT life and that only with turner.
Reply
4-27-2007 @ 6:05AM
brandon said...
The only thing we really need is a threat that can hold on to the ball. Why not risk a great amount for someone that will be a threat all over the field and take preasure off the run. Calvin is the difference between crushing teams and sqeaking by, and not relying on a kicker with a leg that can't hit it from 50 yards.
Reply