About a month ago, we wrote about Brooklyn law professor Wendy Seltzer posting a clip of the NFL's copyright notice to YouTube, only to watch the NFL send YouTube a Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown notice. YouTube responded by removing the video.Seltzer, however, was far from finished with this matter. In an attempt to demonstrate the DMCA process to her students -- and to the public at large -- she sent a counter-notification to YouTube, claiming that the clip was being used for critical and educational purposes and thus met Fair Use guidelines for non-infringing use of a copyrighted work. As a result, YouTube agreed with her counter-claim and put the video clip back online.
The NFL found out about this, however, and sent YouTube another takedown notice. YouTube complied and removed the video again.
One problem, though -- the second takedown notice may have been illegal. According to Seltzer:
Since my counter-notification included a description of the clip, "an educational excerpt featuring the NFL's overreaching copyright warning aired during the Super Bowl," it put the NFL on clear notice of my fair use claim.
The DMCA way for NFL to challenge that, per 512(g)(2)(C), would be to "file[] an action seeking a court order to restrain the subscriber from engaging in infringing activity relating to the material," which they haven't. Sending a second notification that fails to acknowledge the fair use claims instead puts NFL into the 512(f)(1) category of "knowingly materially misrepresent[ing] ... that material or activity is infringing."
What? You mean the NFL might have actually broken the law? And they have the nerve to tell the Cincinnati Bengals to get their house in order? Horrible.
The NFL been vigilant -- perhaps too vigilant -- in getting its video clips scrubbed off YouTube, and this time around, they may have opened themselves up to a rather large liability. The only question now is how far Professor Seltzer go in pursuing this matter. Tons of bloggers love to jump on copyright abusers, and the last thing the league needs is someone as loud as Cory Doctorow comparing Roger Goodell to Pacman Jones.





















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-20-2007 @ 1:06AM
Miss Gossip said...
I love how Youtube tries to keep its hands clean. Take down the video, sure! Put it back up, sure!
Reply
3-20-2007 @ 12:57PM
JP said...
i hope Seltzer follows this through all the way! the nfl absolutely screwed us (nbx) on YouTube. got our entire channel removed partially over some Rex Grossman video that we shot ourselves in Miami! copywrite infringement is one thing, but Fair Use and Parody laws are there to keep our Freedom of Speech intact.
Reply
3-20-2007 @ 1:20PM
JP said...
i hope she follows through on this case all the way. the NFL (and other media titans) don't have any right to curtail free speech, which is protected by Fair Use and Parody of their material.
personally, we (nbx) were SCREWED by the NFL on YouTube. they had our channel removed primarily based on some Rex Grossman footage we shot ourselves in Miami (at great expense to us). copywrite infringement is one thing...but the NFL has way overstepped their boundaries on this one.
Reply
4-18-2007 @ 4:13PM
thomason said...
We read how the NFL threaten many about use of the "Super Bowl" name, but did they follow through on any of those threats?
Reply